If this notice remains visible, your browser has blocked or doesn't allow using Javascript. The contents of this document are completely accessible, although without JavaScript you won't be able to use the interactive features it includes.

0 INTRODUCTION TO THIS MANUAL

0.1 Aim of the Introduction

The last decade of the XX century brought with it an important change in the way of dealing with environmental problems caused by human activity. This, in fact, was one step further in the evolution of environmental thought (table 0.1). However, if the 1990's had one specific characteristic, it was the progressive introduction of the concept of prevention, that is, of avoiding environmental problems at their source, instead of dealing with already existing problems. Over this long period of time, it was shown that avoiding negative environmental impact is far more cost-effective than correcting it once it has been created. The advantage of prevention has become clear when it has been necessary to make major investments in correcting the impact of earlier activity for which it had been wrongly assumed that there was no cost if environmental effects were externalised (in any case there was no cost for manufacturers who externalised pollution). Within this process of changing mentalities in favour of prevention at source, a significant role was without doubt played by Cleaner Production (CP). CP is the most widespread method of prevention throughout the world in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and this is why it is used in this manual.

The aim of this introductory chapter is to give the student an idea of:

Table 0.1 Evolution of environmental perspectives
PERIOD PERCEPTION OF THE PROBLEMS REGULATIONS, STANDARDS TECHNOLOGY
< 1970 Local problems Local actions Dilution
70s
  • Water pollution
  • Ecological disasters
  • Specific to the medium
  • Discharge limits
  • Polluter pays
  • Treatment after process
  • Energy efficiency
80s
  • Polluted land
  • Ozone layer
  • Acid rain
  • Minimising toxic substances
  • Cross-border agreements
  • Remediation
  • Exportation of the problem
  • Impact modelling
90s
  • Climate change
  • Sustainable development
  • Integration
  • Environmental management systems
  • Prevention, CP
  • Eco-design, LCA
  • Industrial ecology

0.2 Curricular Introduction

Universities educate specialists who, in the future, whether as educators at different levels or as professionals in industries and institutions, will have a major influence on the behaviour of business and society. Universities are therefore responsible for raising students' awareness, providing them with the knowledge they need and training them to use management tools that, when all is said and done, are what make sustainable development possible. Universities have the ability to develop the conceptual framework for reaching this goal. They should play this role in their own areas of training and research, in public information and in helping to develop the appropriate strategies and policies suitable for these objectives.

As part of this task, universities should:

0.3 Aim of the Manual

The aim of this document is to provide the student with an updated idea of the principles and methods of CP, and to prepare them for action in the future. It is aimed at university students and professionals who would like to acquire full training in CP, the most widespread method focused on prevention, or to learn about its main concepts in order to incorporate these into a more heterogeneous view of environmental techniques.

This manual is not intended to be purely informative or to be used as an encyclopaedia. Instead it is intended to be educational in the application of the different methodologies and in the elements supporting these methodologies. It is conceived as a guide to introduce CP to future professionals, using experience gained during the development period of CP.

The manual can be used for self-training or with the help of a teacher who makes a monitoring on the progress of the students. This monitoring is of particular interest for the case studies given at the end of the chapters, because often there is not one but several possible ways of interpreting the conclusions or focusing solutions. In specific circumstances it may even be possible to find a more appropriate answer to the self-assessment questions throughout the text than those given in the document. Tutors can apply their own training and experience to judge whether the students' interpretation is reasonable.

0.4 Scope and Content of the Manual

Like many other texts that aim to provide the results of a wide range of different experiences in the form of a methodology, chapters need to be divided depending on their content rather than by the industrial sector in which the experience may be applied. This would be another possibility for training in CP, that is thought to be less appropriate (and more difficult to apply) in a university context.

Fortunately, as a complement to this manual, there is a large quantity of reference material available that can be applied to almost all industrial sectors, which readers will have to use when they want to apply the methodology. A variety of books and manuals provide detailed descriptions for a specific sector. In addition, lots more information can be found on the Internet.

The manual is divided into the following chapters:

0.5 Document Structure

Each chapter contains a theoretical element with the corresponding table of contents and a practical section including a series of exercises intended to provide a pause for examination and reflection rather than for self-assessment.

In addition, the majority of chapters also contain:

1 PREVENTION AT THE SOURCE AND CP

1.1 Objective

Cleaner Production (CP) is associated with the industry and the environment. Industry is an economic and social instrument of well-being and quality of life, but at the same time industry has led to environmental conflicts. Therefore, it is included in the goals of sustainable development. In many countries CP has been adopted for pollution prevention at the source.

The goal of this chapter is to:

1.2 Sustainable Development and CP

The concept of sustainable development [1], [2] became part of everyday language after the publication in 1987 of the report Our Common Future [3], also known as the Brundtland Report, prepared by the United Nations Environment and Development Commission. The goal of the Commission was to link environmental problems to development problems, combining the fight against poverty with the economy and ecology. The first lines of action for sustainable development were defined in 1992 in the the Agenda 21 [4].

Sustainable development is defined as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Whereas economic growth represents a quantitative increase in monetary units, sustainable development is interpreted as a qualitative growth that prevents the depletion of primary resources and environmental impacts.

It is at the Conference of the United Nations on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, that a first action plan was established for the 21st century, which was called Agenda 21. This global agenda must serve as a reference for governments, enterprises and all kinds of organizations in their search for sustainable development. Agenda 21 focuses on improving the quality of life of citizens while preserving the carrying capacity of the eco-systems that support it. This goal implies an appropriate It is at the Conference of the United Nations on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, that a first action plan was established for the 21st century, which was called Agenda 21. This global agenda must serve as a reference for governments, enterprises and all kinds of organizations in their search for sustainable development. Agenda 21 focuses on improving the quality of life of citizens while preserving the carrying capacity of the eco-! systems that support it. This goal implies an appropriate conservation and management of resources and reinforcing the role of the groups concerned, including the industry. These targets are thoroughly reviewed every five years. Agenda 21 has acted as a stimulus for step-by-step implementation of CP programmes worldwide.

While seeking to define sustainable development, the concept of Cleaner Production (CP) was launched by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in 1989 as the form of production that requires taking into account, conceptually and in their implementation process, all the stages of the life-cycle of a product or process, with the aim of preventing or minimizing human and environmental risk, in the short and the long term.

1.3 Hierarchy of Approaches to Environmental Management

When the dilution of pollutants in the environment proved to be an unsustainable form of environmental management, end-of-pipe treatments were implemented to eliminate or reduce the problems of waste streams, by treating them externally to the manufacturing process they originate from. Within the hierarchy of approaches to environmental management (list 1.1), waste stream treatments are currently considered the next-to-last option. In order of preference, they come just before controlled disposal.

End-of-pipe treatments are currently viewed as a materially and economically inefficient form of resource management. They can lower the risk associated to waste flows, although they mainly transfer pollution to another medium (for example, the waste from the cleaning of emissions to air is transferred to wastewaters, the treatments of water effluents leave solid waste, etc.).

List 1.1 - Hierarchy of approaches to environmental management
  1. Reduction at the source
  2. Internal and external recycling
  3. Material and energy valorisation
  4. Waste stream treatments
  5. Controlled disposal when there is no other solution

CP allows to prevent or reduce the need for end-of-pipe treatments of waste streams. For example, in the tanning industry, applying a technique of highly spent chromium baths as a CP measure, leads to savings in raw materials while reducing the pollutant load of effluents.

1.4 Definition of CP

UNEP [5] Cleaner Production has defined PNUMA as:

The definition of CP covers a wide scope, although in the nineties it was best applied to existing manufacturing processes and particularly as a programme for eco-efficiency aimed at SMEs. In the 21st century its progression is evident in the product and service areas.

The target of cleaner production is zero pollution, even though all waste is potentially polluting and some waste is inevitable. If it were possible to eliminate all waste, by fully recycling it for example, the problem of cleaner production would be easy to solve, at least in theory. However, although absolute clean production may be impossible to attain, it is a goal, the same as zero emission that leads to a continuous progress in eco-efficiency. This is why the term of Cleaner Production, is used, to avoid the dilemma deriving from the use of the term "clean production".

The continuous application of an integrated preventive environmental strategy applied to processes, products and services to increase overall efficiency and reduce risks to humans and the environment. CP is applied to:

CP implementation requires a change in attitudes, aimed at guaranteeing responsible environmental management and creating conducive national policy environments and evaluating technology options.

The definition of UNEP has been adopted as such, or with minor differences, in most Mediterranean countries [6]. Only in European Union (EU) countries that associate CP directly with Sustainable Development (Italy) or that equate it with Best Available Techniques (Greece), there is no official definition or unofficial formulation of CP.

1.5 The Origin of CP

1.5.1 "Waste Minimization" and "Pollution Prevention" in the USA

Since the seventies, the need to evolve to more efficient forms of industrial management has spread in the United States. There are examples from those years, such as the 3P programme: Pollution Prevention Pays. Implementation of a minimization program was intimately linked to soil pollution. During the sixties, the use of abandoned wells and ditches was common in most countries, to dump hazardous waste. These were often located near inhabited areas, on low cost sites that were cheap for transport to access. Events like the Love Canal, with unfortunate consequences due to toxic substances that had been buried under areas that were subsequently urbanized, increased citizen concern driving the US Congress to approve the Resource and Recovery Act in 1970, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) in 1976.

The RCRA was debated in Congress at the same time as the Toxic Substances Control Act that dealt with the problem of new chemical substances introduced on the market. Possibly stimulated by the high costs involved in the cleaning of soils included in multimillion programmes, the National Research Council, in 1985, and the Office of Technology Assessment, in 1986, recommended waste minimization as a more economical alternative for pollution control. Almost immediately, the USEPA published its analysis of preferred alternatives for the reduction of pollution defined as waste minimization" [7]. For the USEPA, waste minimization refers to any action aimed at reducing the volume or toxicity of regulated hazardous wastes. Therefore, it not only includes reduction at the source but also waste recycling and treatment.

Considering that, as it was officially defined, minimization did not sufficiently prioritize the reduction of pollution at the source, in 1990 the Pollution Prevention Act, was approved in the USA defining pollution prevention as "any practice which reduces the amount of any hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant entering any waste stream or otherwise released into the environment (including fugitive emissions) prior to recycling, treatment, or disposal".

(In the English terminology, pollution is the preferred term to designate the contamination that can produce damages).

During the eighties, the government of Ontario, Canada, also promoted reduction at the source and published an advanced Manual on Industrial Waste Audit and Reduction [8] in 1987.

For the Canadian Federal Government, pollution prevention is any action aimed at reducing or eliminating the generation of pollutants or waste at the source, through activities that aim to promote, encourage or boost changes in the basic performance of industrial, commercial or institutional generators of the community, government or individuals.Pollution prevention includes practices aimed at eliminating or reducing the use of materials that are hazardous or not, energy, water, or other resources as well as those that protect natural resources through an improved preservation or more efficient use.

1.5.2 CP background in Europe

Since 1977, el UNEP, together with the Economic Commission for Europe (EEC), carried out a series of activities aimed at promoting environmentally sound forms of production, defined as low- or non-waste technologies, which were referred to in the eighties at some European events, as Clean Technologies [9].

One of the first experiences of CP in Europe was a waste minimization project carried out in Landskrona (Sweden).

The Landskrona study began in 1987 and aimed to explore the economic and environmental benefits associated with the reduction at the source of effluents and gaseous emissions. In 1988, a study was carried out in Holland, with CP characteristics, called PRISMA. The study concluded that it was feasible in the short term to reduce waste generation, leading to improvements in product quality and to an increase in productivity. Following the success of PRISMA a European project called PREPARE (Preventive Environmental Protection Approaches in Europe), was organized to promote projects in various European countries, applying the CP methodology.

In order to establish a network for the exchange of information and to promote the transfer of cleaner technologies, a group of experts under the auspices of PNUMA in 1988-89 89 recommended publishing a journal called Cleaner Production, which would be the beginning of the dissemination of the CP concept.

The Rio 1992 Conference incorporated environmental, economic and social factors, as a framework for sustainable development. In order to modify the previous patterns of production and consumption, the need was confirmed to develop and transfer cleaner technologies, giving a decided boost in the direction appointed by CP.

In a short time, the CP approach has been diffused by UNEP and implemented by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) in more than twenty countries of economies in transition (Eastern and Central Europe) and developing countries (in Latin America, Asia and Africa) transferring between the countries, specific experience acquired in various industrial sectors. Simultaneously to UNEP/UNIDO, a programme, some North American and European countries, aware that small and medium enterprises (SMEs) do not always have the means and time required to adapt to the new paradigm, have also chosen to diffuse similar concepts based on their own experience, with a strong incidence in Mediterranean countries.

1.5.3 CP in the Mediterranean region

One of the first CP initiatives developed in the Mediterranean region, was carried out by the government of Catalonia in Spain, in 1991 with the publication of a Guideline for the assessment of opportunities to reduce waste in industrial processes [10]. Later on, after gathering experiences from various sectors, an eco-management methodology was published, that was called:Minimization Opportunities Environmental Diagnosis (MOED) [11]. At an institutional level, the Centre of Cleaner Production Initiatives was created in 1994 later called the Centre for the Enterprise and the Environment, CEMA, aimed at promoting the goals and advantages of pollution reduction at the source among Catalan firms.

Generally, in Mediterranean countries, while there were no specific CP centres, the Ministries of Environment or their Agencies, (such as ADEME in France) along with the environmental associations, Chambers of Commerce and Industry, and Universities, have acted as agents to promote awareness and disseminate environmentally sound technologies, as well as CP understood as the sum of management and technology.

CP centres and similar bodies have been progressively established in East and South Mediterranean countries with Malta and Tunisia as the first countries in the region along with Catalonia, to open centres specialized in CP. There has been a Clean Technology Centre in Malta since 1994, under the Department for Environmental Protection that is located in the University of Malta. In Tunisia, since 1996, the International Centre for Environmental Technologies (CITET) has been promoting and implementing CP very actively, initially supported by USEPA and then through a UNIDO/UNEP, CP programme [12]. Later, almost all the countries in the South and East Mediterranean have established, or are in the process of setting up, CP centres with support from international agencies for cooperation and development, in most cases.

The EU Mediterranean countries generally don't devote any particular effort to CP, as they consider it to be included in the activities imposed by the EU, environmental Directives, particularly environmental Directives, particularly through the IPPC and the Best Available Techniques (BAT) published; there are exceptions such as Spain, where the CEMA in Catalonia and the IHOBE in the Basque country are specific centres for CP.

1.5.4 Basic Principles of CP Sustainability

According to the European Environment Agency EEA [13], the basic principles regulating the CP strategy are:

  1. The Precautionary Principle

    It is explained in Principle 15 of the Rio 1992 Declaration, appealing to the States to implement it as far as possible in order to protect the environment. The precautionary principle establishes that "Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation".

  2. The Prevention Principle

    The difference with the previous principle is basically that when it is known that a product or process is harmful, changes must be made to the cause. Prevention requires going upstream in the production process to prevent the problem at the source instead of trying to remedy the end damage. It also encourages the use of renewable energies and energy efficiency instead of ineffectively consuming fossil fuels.

  3. The Principle of Integration

    Integration implies adopting a holistic view of the production cycle aimed at protecting environment in an integrated way and thus avoiding pollutant transfer between environmental compartments: air, water and soil, while taking into account the entire life-cycle of products.

  4. The Democratic Principle

    The democratic principle involves all those concerned by the way in which the industrial activity is managed, including the workers and the local community. The principle is detailed, for example, in the European Directive EMAS II (of voluntary compliance), concerning issues of communication and external relations and the involvement of workers. The democratic principle also points clearly to the right to environmental information.

The experience accumulated in CP implementation shows that, in manufacturing activities, the best way to introduce principles 2 and 3 is to integrate environmental protection in the production process [14].

1.6 CP and Eco-efficiency

Eco-efficiency is a strategy combining environmental improvement and economic benefits. As such, it allows to achieve production processes that are more efficient while reducing the consumption of resources and pollution (diagram 1.2). Eco-efficiency boosts innovation and competitiveness and can therefore open up significant business opportunities. Its goal is to make economies grow in quality rather than in quantity. In other words, it seeks to increase value with less impact.

Diagram 1.2 CP and Eco-efficiency in Pollution Prevention at the source

The concept of eco-efficiency has been adopted by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD, World Bussiness Council for Sustainable Development) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The WBCSD has gone from using eco-efficiency as a simple concept concepto simple (as it did in 1991) to using it as a vehicle to improve the business performance. The WBCSD has acknowledged a parallel between eco-efficiency and CP; both concepts appeared almost at the both concepts appeared almost at the same time and have developed simultaneously through the exchange of knowledge and experiences, leading to their mutual strengthening [15], [16].

For the WBCSD, which is supported by some of the major business corporations worldwide, eco-efficiency can only be achieved if we can deliver goods and services produced competitively, that meet human requirements and improve our quality of life, while progressively reducing the ecological impact and the use of resources to a level that is at least in line with the carrying capacity of the earth.

The OCDE also promotes an eco-efficient approach Opportunities are open to all kinds of enterprises although the eco-efficiency implementation formula tends to vary from large corporations to SMEs.

For the OCDE, eco-efficiency means the efficiency with which resources are used to meet human needs. It can be considered as the relation between the production or services obtained (output) and the sum of environmental pressures generated (input). This relation can refer to either a company, an industrial sector or to the economy as a whole. The OECD studies confirm the CP experience whereby manufacturers have found cost-effective ways of reducing the use of materials, energy and water by 10-40 % per production unit. Likewise, proven technologies can reduce the use of toxic substances by at least 90 %.

For the OECD, there are four areas of eco-efficiency opportunities:

  • Optimizing processes, reducing the use of resources, impacts and operating costs.
  • Revaluating by-products through cooperation between companies aimed at improving economic efficiency while moving towards the zero-waste target.
  • Redesigning products.
  • Innovating products and services to deliver better designs and functions, minimizing their impact and increasing participation in the market.

Large corporations have a series of resources of their own that allow them to incorporate eco-efficiency from an internal perspective and with internal means. This is the big difference with the limited capacity of many SMEs. Thus, CP was organized as a specific methodology aimed at offering SMEs access to eco-efficiency, initially in a few industrialized countries and then, through international programmes, in industrialized and developing countries.

1.7 The Role of Governments regarding Prevention

The OECD attributes to governments the responsibility for establishing a political framework, aimed at reducing the gap between social and private targets and reinforcing the efforts to be applied by companies in order to improve their economic, environmental and working conditions. As instruments to be used, the OECD supports regulations and economic incentives as well as the creation of a climate that encourages innovation and allows to boost new options improving those conditions. The governments must also play an important role in communication, raising community awareness regarding the difference between waste prevention and more traditional activities, such as recycling [17].

As regards the environmental conditions, in the government's options of either requiring the producer, guaranteeing the consumer or verifying the honesty of the message, the political framework developed must strive to:

  • ensure the coherency and consistency of the economic incentives,
  • internalize the costs of environmental damage whenever possible,
  • develop policies that include eco-efficiency as an objective in the planning of soil utilization, technological education and innovation.

For the OECD, CP and eco-efficiency are the instrumental stimuli that have allowed to increase waste prevention efficiency. This organization calls for a governmental strategy that will prioritize waste or materials presenting an intrinsic risk or a significant indirect impact during their extraction, use and management.

A waste prevention strategy focuses on four aspects:

  • A life-cycle perspective aimed at identifying points of intervention with optimum benefits.
  • Evaluating the goals, instruments and assessing the results separately for the different types and categories of material flows.
  • A substantial integration of the social and economic aspects in the debate on the environmental waste reduction policy.
  • Institutional mechanisms to facilitate the cooperation between the traditional structures, aimed at achieving a synergy.

1.8 Case Study: CP in Mediterranean Countries

Since the mid-nineties, Mediterranean countries have shown a continuous progress in the adoption of measures that have either directly or indirectly encouraged CP[6], [12]. centres have been created, or are in the process of starting up in most East and South Mediterranean countries.

This progress has not only been boosted by the national CP centres but other institutions have also participated including, chambers of commerce and industry, universities and other centres as well as some specialising in energy.

Many of these countries are undergoing an industrial modernization process and their public institutions have considered that CP could be a tool aimed at improving the environmental action of companies while increasing competitiveness at the same time, even in those cases in which the environmental authorities have relaxed the enforcement of the legislation. Most countries that have developed or modernized their National Action Plans for Environment, have generalized CP as a key element for implementing sustainable development in the industrial sector.

On the other hand, in North Mediterranean countries there are very few centres specifically devoted to CP, except in Spain, where CP is considered as part of the general programmes adopted by the agents responsible for waste management.

1.8.1 Measures to Boost CP

Most of the Mediterranean countries have approved and regulations with a preventive approach in the protection of the environment, that can include, among other measures, environmental impact assessments of industrial projects, integrated pollution prevention and control, eco-labelling schemes, etc.

Disparities arise in the effective application of the regulations. Differences subsist from one country to another, that can be attributed to various reasons, such as a lack of pressure from the public opinion, insufficient economic and human resources required in environmental organizations, as well as a lack of coordination between these organizations.

In most Mediterranean countries, the number of programmes, initiatives and different tools for CP, promotion has increased, either as a result of the implementation of their own strategies for environmental development and protection, or due to international cooperation.

A large number of initiatives related to CP are aimed at (SMEs), that had previously not been given much attention by the institutions, nor had they participated in sustainability commitments, although this group represents the prevailing productive sector.

1.8.2 Obstacles to CP Implementation

Despite the obvious progress achieved, the efforts of many Mediterranean countries still come up against all sorts of difficulties that prevent the effective implementation of CP programmes. These barriers go from the absence of a collective awareness and ignorance of the advantages of CP to a lack of financial support required for the implementation of efficiency measures included in CP.

Ignorance, associated with a lack of available information, training, lack of experts and dissemination of positive experiences, are the most frequent problems in many countries, and highlight the lack of specialized human resources to boost CP. All this is coupled with a lack of technical literature written in the local language, that particularly affects its diffusion among SMEs.

Economic aids for promoting CP are limited and insufficient. In some countries, the lack of financial support from the government to start carrying out CP assessments in companies can be interpreted as the scarce influence of CP centres in national policies and regulations.

1.8.3 Position of the Companies

In a period in which many Mediterranean developing countries are experiencing a major economic transformation, with a notable trend for privatizing public companies, a deeper governmental commitment is missing as well as institutional support to progress in CP. CP implementation. In most cases, the plans of action for industrial restructuring do not explicitly include any form of CP. Without the necessary administrative mechanisms and, bearing in mind the lax enforcement of regulations, the industry is not encouraged to adopt CP initiatives.

In many cases, a certain fear of innovation has been detected among both top and intermediate management levels. These are examples of the reluctance of companies to change existing management practices and production processes. SMEs, specifically show very conservative attitudes in this sense.

As a result of the scarce capacity of SMEs for calculating costs and the lack of expert support, the managers are not convinced of the direct benefits of CP with regard to their manufacturing procedures.

Moreover, the possibilities of the private sector, particularly SMEs, of direct financial support from banks for specific CP projects, are very limited. The same financial institutions do not have systems that allow to carry out simple economic evaluations of CP projects and therefore they are reluctant to finance them.

The chances of obtaining financial support are remote without prior cost-comprehensive analyses, the implementation of cost-benefit analytical methods or assessment procedures regarding the intangible advantages of the different technological alternatives.

1.8.4 Economic Policies and SMEs

At a macroeconomic level, the international political scenario still does not recognize the complex dependence existing between the environment and the economy, which is necessary to achieve sustainable development. The current National Accounting System is the reference for the main economic indicators which are then used as a basis for preparing national policies and for monitoring their effectiveness.

Politicians, businessmen, the media and even the public concerned, make decisions based on these figures. However, the National Accounting Systems do not take into consideration the depletion or the degradation of natural resources, therefore ignoring sustainable development needs. These lacks are one of the main obstacles to progressing in the internalization of environmental costs and that allow the arbitrary subsidy of the price of some of the non-renewable resources.

Some Mediterranean countries continue to subsidize energy and water consumption industries. The relatively low cost of water and energy is a clear example of the negative effect this has when trying to get the industry to commit to a rational use of the resources; quite the opposite, it discourages savings and even leads to excessive consumption.

At a microeconomic level, problems appear when a potential CP has to compete with other investments required, such as safety improvements or an increase in process quality, if the company does not have sufficient own resources to cover all the projects. Often, and particularly in the case of SMEs, companies do not have the capacity to carry out sufficiently thorough evaluations of their environmental costs.

The company may renounce to investing in CP options, despite their cost-effectiveness, if it has to obtain financing from external sources and the economic conditions are not favourable, which is not at all unusual in the production sector.

The managers do not know the origin of the environmental expenses carried out by the company. As they are not accounted for or recorded as allocations to corresponding products, the managers cannot show when end-of-pipe treatments or waste disposal have a higher cost that the preventive approach. This economical information is lacking at the time of decision-making.

Another financial barrier is the rigid position adopted by private credit institutions, whose decision for financing CP initiatives, does not take into consideration project viability in itself, as this decision is made exclusively on the basis of economic and financial data that the company usually has and that may not be at the same level as the specific CP project proposed.

With the exception of a few cases in which revolving funds are used, that are administrated institutionally to finance CP projects, the situation is far from satisfactory.

In recent years, after acknowledging that project financing was one of the critical aspects for providing a favourable framework for CP, UNEP and other agents involved in boosting CP have devoted particular attention to finding a solution to this problem. The community of CP experts also seek appropriate mechanisms that enable to make these investments attractive to financial institutions. Despite the efforts, it cannot be said that any system has been found to overcome such a critical obstacle.

CP promoters cannot do much on a macroeconomic scale. However, they can be of much help to companies by providing knowledge on environmental accounting. For the aid to be effective, collaboration must be sought from the administrative/accounting departments of companies, supplying procedures of verified efficiency for an analytical cost evaluation and the allocation of environmental costs.

1.8.5 Availability of CP Information

The lack of information has been considered another of the main obstacles for the implementation of CP. However, there are currently very comprehensive dossiers with information on CP and other related subjects, such as pollution prevention and eco-efficiency, prepared by centres such as UNEP/DTIE and the CP/RAC operating on an international and regional scale, respectively. In the case of the CP/RAC, the centre's website contains a variety of information on the application of CP in the Mediterranean region, including a number of case studies (MedClean) undertaken by real companies that have modified their production systems in order to minimise their environmental impact (see, for example, MedClean file no. 6, concerning a case of CP application in the textile industry in Turkey).

In the last few years, a large amount of information, resources and training material covering all the CP issues, has become available in hard copy or on the Internet: handbooks and guides, studies of real cases in most industrial sectors, tools to improve professional activities (ecodesign, green purchase procedures, environmental accounting, etc.), reference manuals on environmental management systems, etc.

the centre's website contains a variety of information on the application of CP in the Mediterranean region, including a number of case studies (MedClean) undertaken by real companies that have modified their production systems in order to minimise their environmental impact (see, for example, MedClean file no. 6, concerning a case of CP application in the textile industry in Turkey).

At present, CP experts can communicate with each other from any part of the world, via e-mail or on forums for experts. The main organizations offer their websites on the Internet, links to other portals on the subject, and links to the best resources on CP and pollution prevention.

Although most of this information can be downloaded freely from internet, many companies in the industrial sector, particularly SMEs, do not have access to Internet. Another backdraw could be an excessive proliferation of information that is not always useful, and can discourage business managers who do not have much time. Another point to be mentioned is the difficulty faced by many companies when the information is not available in their language (most of the information is in English) and is therefore inaccessible to a large section (or all) of the company's personnel.

CP centres and universities can play a very important role in information dissemination and expert training. Unfortunately, the unsatisfactory relationship between universities and the industry is well known. Even in those cases in which a collaboration has been reached between both parts, it is far from meeting the needs of companies. Universities, as training centres for future professionals that will join the economic sector, could play a more relevant role in CP by including its principles and methodologies in their programmes for knowledge transfer.

1.9 Activities

Identify the Targets and Goals of Sustainable Development

Sustainable development involves achieving goals at three levels: biological (ecological), economic and social. Fill in the spaces corresponding to each level with the targets and typical goals listed below [18].

Systems Targets Typical goals
Biological (ecological)
Economic
Social

Targets:

  • Forcing an equitable distribution of resources among the population, including future generations.
  • Maintaining sustainable material and energy flows so as not to overload the biosphere's carrying capacity.
  • Obtaining an allocation of funds in accordance with the consumer's preferences and payment capacity.

Typical goals:

  • Meeting basic needs or reducing poverty
  • Social justice
  • Genetic diversity
  • Cultural diversity
  • Equal rights for men and women
  • Participation
  • Increasing the production of goods and services
  • Biological productivity
  • Recovery capacity
  • Improving equity

Exercises

  1. Indicate whether the following statements are in agreement with sustainable development or not:
    • Takes into account environmental, social and economic aspects
    • Only involves environmental improvement
    • Gives priority to social impact
  2. List in the right order the historic stages of environmental management evolution:
    • Prevention at the source
    • Dilution in the environment
    • Sustainable technologies
    • End-of-pipe treatment
  3. Tick the box corresponding to the correct CP targets:
    • To supplement what has not been achieved by end-of-pipe treatment processes
    • To finance environmental projects
    • To constitute a complete system for environmental management
    • To help SMEs to implement eco-efficiency
  4. Tick the correct statements on the way CP, is applied:
    • It acts on resource consumption
    • It acts on end-of-pipe treatment of wastewater
    • It acts exclusively on product design
    • It helps to identify the most polluting stage of the process

2 CP AND THE ENTERPRISE (SME)

2.1 Objective

Cleaner Production is equally convenient and applicable to any size of enterprise, although the means available for its implementation are not the same. The goal of this chapter is to review the relationships between CP and the enterprise, with special focus on small and medium enterprises (SME):

2.2 Industrial Production Structure

Industrial production takes place in enterprises of very different characteristics, based on:

Even in the most industrialized countries, there are enterprises with very simple structures and functions. At the other end of the scale, there are large corporations with multiple production centres and many companies that, independently from their size, apply modern production processes that are also quite complex.

Modern industrial production processes typically fit into one of the following categories:

  • they use a wide range of raw materials,
  • these raw materials are processed using complex technologies,
  • they are part of production chains between enterprises,
  • they involve specific and sophisticated machinery,
  • their work force is clearly divided into qualified tasks,
  • they require diversified expertise of middle management positions and skilled operators.

Eco-efficiency can be implemented in all kinds of firms. In fact, many firms included in the definition of small and medium enterprises SME often have the capacity to implement innovative improvements that large companies, with excessively centralized structures, do not have.

2.3 What is a Small & Medium Enterprise (SME)?

SMEs generally have features which distinguish them from large enterprises, such as [19]:

SMEs do not respond to a specific definition but depend to some extent on the territory in which they operate which changes over time, particularly with regard to financial factors. A distinction should also be made between small and medium enterprises and micro-enterprises.

If we take as reference the definition of the European Union, (EU), SMEs are companies that have:

  • less than 250 workers, and
  • an annual turnover of less than 40 million euros,
  • a balance of less than 27 million euros,
  • and less than 25 % is owned by a non-SME enterprise.

The small enterprise particularly has:

  • less than 50 workers, and
  • an annual turnover of less than 7 million euros,
  • a balance of less than 5 million euros,
  • and less than 25 % is owned by a non-small enterprise.

A microenterprise can be defined as having less than 10 workers.

2.4 SMEs in the Mediterranean

The relative contribution of SMEs to the environmental impact in the Mediterranean cannot be specified, although it is probably significant as at least 80-90 % of all enterprises are SMEs, their contribution to the total production is important and they prevail in traditionally polluting sectors such as the textile, tanning, printing, and surface coating industries, etc.

In some countries, the availability of industrial land, the demand for cheap consumer products and the abundance of unskilled labour have led to the development of SMEs with a low level of technology within the cities. Many of these enterprises have been favoured by government protection and tolerance, which has allowed them to continue managing their businesses in an inefficient and not very productive manner. In these cases, the development model has led to the appearance of pollution black spots.

In some countries the industry has realised the unsustainability of this model in the long term, recognising the need for pollution prevention or reduction and introducing preventive measures to encourage the implementation of CP programmes. In these countries, the production and consumption patterns are progressively getting better. The role of SMEs in the improvement of environmental impact should be significant to match their importance in the overall industrial production.

Some North-Eastern Mediterranean countries are undergoing economic restructuring programmes as a result of the political reform following the collapse of Communism and the beginning of a gradual market liberalisation process. The end of central planning has led to legal and institutional reform and a privatising process. Although they are not all developing at the same speed, these countries are showing a high level of social commitment and implementing technological improvements that coexist with obsolete and polluting technologies. In this situation, the SMEs have started their own process of development and contribution to industrial production.

2.5 Environmental Performance and Competitiveness

In order to link their processes with the environmental requirements, large companies usually have their own team of experts in environmental management, or sufficient resources to engage the external services that adapt to their extra requirements. On the other hand, SMEs often have a biased perception of what CP is and difficulties in implementing it and converting part of the standards required into a favourable factor.

When SMEs do not devote enough attention and resources to environmental management, they generally allege one of the following causes: lack of time, lack of money, lack of adequate technology. Therefore, their excuses are frequently that their qualified personnel are too busy with other jobs to be able to spend time looking for a proactive answer to environmental requirements, or that their financial resources are aimed at other priorities, or that they are lacking the necessary information to design a strategy of change. In such cases, the excuse given is combined with the perception that the environmental factor only has negative repercussions for the enterprise

Nevertheless many SMEs have a capacity for innovation and flexibility to adapt to present conditions that is higher than for large enterprises. These SMEs can benefit from the fact that the industrial complexity requires decentralized and flexible production systems able to adapt more readily to the waves of changes that the market imposes CP has the necessary ingredients to be the stepping stone for them to advance towards an innovative strategy. On the other hand, enterprises that have a narrow perception of environmental issues, can take the opportunity to become more competitive by implementing eco-efficient measures, thus securing themselves a place in the industrial future.

2.6 Incentives for CP Implementation

The first reason enterprises are given for implementing environmental management including CP is to comply with legal requirements. However, whereas other environmental measures are costly, CP measures are self justifying as they represent a tangible economic benefit or a less evident business performance improvement.

There are many opportunities to adopt CP measures when enterprises are forced to internalize environmental costs after being subjected to some form of the "polluter pays" principle, they must adopt end-of-pipe treatments or pay a waste management firm to take care of their waste.

The financial reasons are often accompanied by other reasons such as the need to preserve their business image, or the liability that could arise from human injury or environmental damage caused by a type of pollution that the public would link to the enterprise's operation.

Therefore, some of the many incentives which can be identified to implement CP, are:

2.7 The Customer-Supplier Chain

There is another reason for certain enterprises to implement a CP programme. Some large enterprises often require SMEs suppliers to have a sustainable policy and performance. Contrarily, an SME may be excluded from the supplier catalogue. More and more, SMEs will will find themselves having to implement an Environmental Management System (EMS) that meets with the customer's approval, as integral part of a production chain.(SGA) que satisfaga al cliente, como parte integrante de una cadena de producción.

Adapting to certain requirements from industrial customers and consumers and being able to show an appropriate ecolabel could be as important at present as quality requirements or just-in-time (JIT) supplies. In the same way that the supplier can be requested to have a quality standard, such as ISO 9000, he can also be requested for an environmental quality guarantee, such as an Environmental Management System (EMS) (chapter 3) which includes some form of CP.

2.8 Difficulties in CP Implementation

In return for the mentioned incentives, CP shall have to overcome a series of difficulties for its implementation. In order to bridge the obstacles, these difficulties shall need to be identified and overcome, at the same time as the benefits of CP are explained. There are still serious obstacles in many Mediterranean countries for the implementation of CP [20].

Among of the main difficulties found in some countries, are the following:

On a macroeconomic scale, the international political scenario does not acknowledge the complex relationship between economy and environment, required for sustainable development. The national accounting system, from which the main economic indicators derive, that are used to develop policies and measure their effectiveness, does not take into consideration the depletion of the natural resources or the pollution of the land. Therefore, they do not consider sustainable development nor do they encourage the internationalisation process of environmental costs

Moreover, some Mediterranean countries continue to subsidise the industry's energy and water costs, leading to a lack of motivation for adopting techniques that make a rational use of the resources.

2.9 Characteristics of Enterprises

The implementation of a CP programme is made easier when there is a good perception of the particular characteristics of the company in which it will be implemented. During the initial stage and particularly if the CP simplementation is carried out with an external consultant, aside from the specific details of the company such as address, persons in charge, industrial sector, size, etc., it is convenient to obtain a characterisation of the industry with regard to the following aspects:

2.10 Functional View and Process

There are two main views for an organisation; the functional view and the process view. The classic division of work has led enterprises to set up departments for their organisation. Each functional department contributes to the creation of a product or service through tasks that can be managed separately. However, many activities cross over the borders of the departments with the so-called work flows or processes between departments. Total cost management systems are behind this view of the processes because, amongst other advantages, they allow to assign general costs on the basis of the cause-effect relationship (chapter 4).

The functional view is linked to the company's organisation chart. The resources belong to the departments. The specialized functions are gathered in the departments, which relate structurally with one another through a hierarchy of information. The functional improvement programmes seek to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the specific functions and the departments.

The process view focuses on the work itself, identifying the work elements (processes) that must be developed for the company to function. This way of seeing the company is advantageous in the customer-supplier relationship because it corresponds to the way in which the customer interacts with the enterprise: hiring, quality assurance, reception of products and services, payments and after-sales service requirements. The basic processes are divided into sub-processes, which in turn are divided into activities. A clear understanding of which (work) processes occur in an enterprise will allow the businessman to apply continuous improvement measures and achieve a total and effective management based on costs in activities (chapter 4).

Following are some examples of typical operation sub-processes:

  • product planning
  • pricing of materials
  • procurement
  • planning of equipment and facilities
  • conversion planning
  • quality control
  • maintenance

Example of activities analysis applied to a purchase process of material:

The process view focuses on the work itself, identifying the work elements (processes) that must be developed for the company to function. This way of seeing the company is advantageous in the customer-supplier relationship because it corresponds to the way in which the customer interacts with the enterprise: hiring, quality assurance, reception of products and services, payments and after-sales service requirements. The basic processes are divided into sub-processes which in turn are divided into activities. A clear understanding of which (work) processes occur in an enterprise will allow the businessman to apply continuous improvement measures and achieve a total and effective management based on costs in activities (chapter 4).

Following are the six basic processes [22]:

2.11 Environmental Activity Indicators

In order to see the evolution of some of the key aspects of the environmental performance of an enterprise and easily communicate this behaviour, it is advisable to use environmental indicators [23], [24]. These indicators offer information on the current situation and allow to carry out a comparative follow up of improvements achieved over time. For many enterprises, it may be very important to formally adopt the concept of environmental performance assessment developed as a ISO 14031 Standard [25].

For the OECD, an indicator is a parameter or a value derived from parameters, that points to/provides information on/describes the state of an issue/environment/area in terms that go beyond those directly associated with the value of the parameter [26]. A parameter is a measured or observed property, just as an index is a series of aggregated or weighted parameters or indicators. The analytic framework that is generally adopted for environmental indicators is the pressure-state-response (figure 2.1).

Figure 2.1 Framework for Environmental Indicators: Pressure-State-Response

The assessment of the environmental performance is an internal process and a management tool designed to provide reliable and verifiable information to the management aimed at determining on the spot if the company's environmental performance meets the criteria fixed by the organisation's management.

From a business management viewpoint, the indicators fulfil three basic functions:

The effectiveness of the indicators depends on the extent with which they manage to:

Generally, a group of indicators is adopted--not too many--covering the different environmental aspects.

ISO14001 Standard [27] determines the environmental aspects, such as the elements of the operations, products or services of an organisation, that can interact with the environment, some of the most important of which are:

  • emissions to air
  • discharges to water
  • waste management
  • soil pollution
  • use of natural raw materials and resources
  • other local environmental issues affecting the community

Lowell University has focused on six main aspects of sustainable production [24] to be taken into consideration when a series of environmental indicators is proposed (see case study in section 2.12):

  1. Consumption of resources: reduce consumption of materials, water, energy; use renewable energies, etc.
  2. Waste flows: reduce impacts on the natural environment; toxicity, greenhouse effect, etc.
  3. Economy of the system: environmental costs; faulty refunds, etc.
  4. Workers: accident tax, training, etc.
  5. Products: recyclability, packaging biodegradability, etc.
  6. Social and community development: relations with the neighbouring community, local workers, etc.

2.12 Case Study: Pollution Prevention in Process Industries

For Haas, there is a huge difference between an operational view (how can we improve?) and a strategic view (how can we use that improvement to outdo our competitors?) [28]. Eight aspects of production that are interrelated need to be taken into account. Decisions are essential in these eight aspects of manufacture to achieve strategic improvements. Berglund [29] has reintroduced the eight aspects that Haas identified as the basic aspects and has studied what role pollution prevention plays in all of them:

  1. Product Design

    Products must be designed that are less toxic, less persistent, easier to recycle or to treat. The focus should be on:

    • preventing certain products from entering the environment (eliminating CFCs for example);
    • making them easier to eliminate from the environment (use of recyclable plastic, for example)
    • making them easier to reuse (vehicles that are easy to dismount, for example).
  2. Process Design

    From their experience in Union Carbide, the authors have concluded that prevention in industrial plants advances in stages:

    • Phase I: the first efforts focus on alternatives that are simpler, more obvious and cost-effective; these include Good Operating Practices, waste segregation, simple recycling without treatments. They are applied to the operation rather than to the physical system and have a good economic return.

    • Phase II: operations emerge that are more complex and expensive and often related to equipment modification, process modifications and process controls. This phase can include adding or adapting ancillary equipment for simple treatments at the source, possibly to recirculate materials. These generally offer less immediate return on the investment and require further justification.

    • Phase III: focuses on intrinsic waste (inherent to the basic process configuration), more complex recycling, more essential changes in the process, changes in raw materials and catalysts, or product reformulations. As the payback periods are longer, they are easier to introduce when a new unit or process is developed.

  3. Configuration of the Plant

    Two aspects are particularly important. The first is the complete integration of the plant; that is to say, a plant that can make the best use of all the products and by-products whithin the same plant. It is easier to achieve by extending the concept to a customer-supplier chain. The second aspect is easiness with which maintenance is carried out and to introduce changes in the process.

  4. Information and Control

    In addition to a system which allows optimisation of yields and minimisation of unwanted by-products, a control must be made available of the waste (or of the waste management companies when the responsibility does not end with the delivery of waste to the management firm), to minimise out-of-control situations (with a solid system).

  5. Human Resources

    In order to involve all the workers, their formation and training in the identification of prevention opportunities is important, as well as appropriate involvement and the acknowledgement and rewarding of improvements.

  6. Research and Development

    Four aspects are considered important:

    1. Finding new processes and modifying existing processes
    2. New segregation technologies
    3. Analytical techniques to help identify pollution sources
    4. Support for incremental improvements.
  7. Customer - Supplier Relations

    Waste prevention and reduction are easier to achieve with a close customer-supplier relationship. This includes suppliers of equipments and raw materials.

  8. Organisation

    Support and commitment must come from all levels of the enterprise, which will be organized to encourage team work and interaction between all the personnel. For example, it is to be noted that the accounting department plays a major role in the identification of the best opportunities to acknowledge the benefits of a prevention programme, which is not always borne in mind.

Berglund proposes a group of characteristics from each functional area, implementation aspects and trends related to prevention (and CP) (table 2.1).

Table 2.1 The Eight Main Aspects of Manufacture

Functional area

Characteristics that relate to CP

Implementation aspects they include

Relevant trends that society incorporates

Product design

  • Product complexity
  • Composition
  • Reformulations
  • Toxicity, associated risks
  • Transport means Recyclability, degradability disposal
  • Packaging design
  • Expiry
  • Reduction of toxicity
  • Benevolent, green
  • Recycling
  • Final disposal limits

Process design

  • Automation
  • Work conditions
  • Process complexity
  • Maintenance plans
  • Selection of teams
  • Catalyst technology
  • Generation, use of by-products,
  • Storage
  • Treatments, disposal
  • Minimisation of leaks
  • Community awareness
  • Good neighbourhood relations
  • Access to information

Configuration of the plant

  • Location (with regard to the customer)Integration
  • New view on practices
  • Smaller, more integrated
  • Reconfiguration of operations
  • Reuse
  • Licence restrictions
  • Emission limits
  • Risk assessments

Control and information systems

  • Electronic data
  • Computer integration
  • Waste follow up
  • Process monitoring

Public access to electronic data

Human resources

  • Training
  • Motivation
  • Recompense
  • Convince the personnel that CP is a priority
  • Forms of management

Awards for proactive enterprise

Research and development

  • New developments
  • Catalysis, separations
  • Pilot plant tests
  • Alternatives with CP
  • Integration introduced in R+D
  • Use of by-products
  • University-enterprise relationships
  • Academic CP training

Relations with suppliers and customers

  • Outsourcing
  • Sharing
  • Joint ventures
  • Lyfe-cycle management
  • Mutual information

Assessment of complete life-cycle

Organisation

  • Economic study
  • Strategic goals
  • Strategic management
  • Top Management support
  • Corporate environmental view
  • Extra economic factors
  • Team work
  • Social costs
  • Government Aid
  • Inter-industry support groups

2.13 Activities

Exercise 1

  1. Check which of the following are likely to be SMEs:

    • Brewery
    • Car factory
    • Manufacture of shock absorbers for cars
    • Car repair shop
    • Petrochemical plant
    • Shoe repair
  2. Check whether the following conditions are likely to help or hinder the implementation of CP in an enterprise:

    • Supplies parts to an car factory
    • Has no competitors in the same geographical area
    • Is dynamic and wants to be stronger in the future
    • Survives and has no other goals
    • Seeks competitive advantages
    • Personnel is very classic and old-fashioned
    • Has a high waste flow management cost
    • Process yields are lower than its competitors' yields
    • Is not very technically-oriented.
  3. Which of the following words describe more appropriately the functional concept or the process view:

    • Engineering
    • Approval of drawings
    • Purchase department
    • Inspection of equipment
    • Financial assessment
    • Maintenance department
    • Drawing files
    • Preparing a specification.

Exercise 2: Indicators of Sustainable Production

Velleva & Ellenbecker [7] propose a set of de 22 basic indicators of sustainable production associated with the following aspects:

  • Use of materials and energies
  • Natural environment and human health
  • Economic yield
  • Community development and social justice
  • Workers
  • Products

Group into one of the 6 aspects each of the 22 following indicators:

  • Costs associated with environmental, health and safety compliance
  • Energy consumption (total and per production unit)
  • Percentage of biodegradable containers
  • Number of collaborations with the local community
  • Acidification potential (gases to air)
  • Kilos of persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic substances used
  • Percentage of workers who are fully satisfied with the work
  • Average training hours of personnel
  • Percentage of products with an active return policy
  • Water consumption (total and per production unit)
  • Number of workers per production unit/euro of sales
  • Consumption of materials (total and per production unit)
  • Personnel rotation (or average time on station)
  • Rate of customers complaints and/or of refunds
  • Ease of access to decision processes for interested parties
  • Rate of improvement suggestions made by the workers (quality, social, environmental, safety and hygiene)
  • Kilos of general waste before recycling (total and per production unit)
  • Percentage of profits assigned to social expenditure
  • Percentage of energy from renewable energies
  • Working days lost due to work accidents or illnesses
  • Percentage of products designed for reuse, recycling or dismounting
  • Global warming potential (equivalent to tonnes of CO2)

Identification of the Distinguishing Features of an Industry

Although the person implementing the CP programme is not usually a specialist in business management, he must assess the possibilities and difficulties that he can come across when making an assessment. When dealing with SMEs he/she will not need sophisticated business management theories but rather training in identifying the distinguishing features of the industry where CP is to be implemented.

For en la CP training, access to a nearby industry is ideally recommended to make a list of the most common details and relevant features such as:

  • Industrial sector to which the enterprise belongs
  • Size of enterprise (personnel, market, capital, etc.)
  • Origin and background
  • If the enterprise belongs to any business groups
  • Production variety
  • Technological level
  • Vertical integration of processes
  • Reliance on external consultants
  • Internal and external forms of communication
  • Participation of personnel in the decision organs, etc.

In a more advanced technological evaluation of the enterprise, other information may be of interest such as:

  • Degree of automation
  • Equipment intended for a single purpose
  • Flexibility of operation changes
  • Fixed operating sequences
  • Delay times between operations
  • Intermediate stocks between operations
  • Process reliability, etc.

3 CP AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

3.1 Objective

In the framework for a sustainable development, several approaches have been promoted to seek improvement, that are related to eco-efficiency and CP. Some of them are more intended for reflection or being used as indicators of how (un)sustainable a development is (material flows, factor 4, ecological footprint, etc.). Others are tools or strategies aimed at improving the use of the resources, from the planning of systems and products to the decision-making, either by the manufacturer or from the consumer's viewpoint (industrial ecology, ecodesign, life cycle assessment, etc.). The latter can find a place within the general framework of an Environmental Management System (EMS) that every enterprise should have [30] and [31].

The objective of this chapter is to:

3.2 Environmental Management Systems (EMS)

3.2.1 Definition

The environmental management system (EMS) (table 3.1) is a systematic and structured way of managing the environmental aspects of an enterprise. The EMS can be specific to an enterprise or adapted to international regulations.

3.2.2 ISO 14000 Standards

During the nineties, the incorporation of EMSs in the enterprises was standardized through a series of international regulations for environmental management, published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and grouped under the ISO 14000 standard [32]. The purpose of these standards is to promote environmental management in enterprises, the same as with quality management that was promoted by the ISO 9000 regulations.

In 1996, the first issue of the ISO 14000 standards was published. ISO 14001 Standard specifies the requirements of an EMS to allow an organization to formulate a policy and goals, taking into consideration the legal requirements and information concerning significant environmental impacts, but it does not establish specific action criteria.

This international standard can be applied by any organization that wishes to implement, keep up to date and improve an environmental management system.

Series of ISO 14000 Standards on Environmental Management
ISO 14001 Environmental management systems: specifications and directives for use
ISO 14004 Environmental management systems. General directives on principles, systems and support techniques.
ISO 14010 Environmental audit directives. Basic principles
ISO 14011 Environmental audit directives. Audit procedures. Auditing environmental management systems.
ISO 14012 Environmental audit directives. Qualification criteria for environmental auditors.
ISO 14031 Environmental management. Environmental performance assessment. Directives
ISO 14041 Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Definition of the purpose and field and inventory evaluation.
ISO 14050 Environmental management. Glossary.

The implementation stages of the ISO 14000 standard are:

  1. Environmental Policy

    The standard requires that the organization define an environmental policy that must be supported and approved at executive management level and communicated to the personnel of the organization and all the parties involved.

    The environmental policy includes the commitment to continual improvement and pollution prevention, as well as a commitment to comply with the environmental law and regulation applicable.

  2. Planning

    The ISO 14000 standard does not specifically include an initial revision although it is common to have carried it out to allow to decide on the convenience of improving the internal recirculation rate, or to switch to an internal or external recycling process. On this basis, the planning stage of the standard involves:

    • Establishing and promoting a procedure, to identify and evaluate the environmental aspects.
    • Establishing and maintaining objective documents and environmental goals, taking into consideration significant environmental aspects, their technological options and financial, operating and business requirements. The above mentioned environmental policy must be determined in specific goals that will be quantified insofar as possible.
    • Establishing and promoting a programme to achieve the goals.
  3. Implementation and Operation

    This stage requires defining the structure and responsibilities of the environmental management system.

    One of the mainstays of correct implementation of the EMS is a fluid communication, as well as awareness and training of all the personnel in the organization.

    Procedures must be developed to promote communication between the different levels and functions of the organization and to receive, document and answer these communications with the parties involved.

    It is also necessary to document and identify all the operations and activities associated with any significant environmental aspects, to establish the corresponding operational control.

    Lastly, this stage must also include and promote emergency plans and response capacity aimed at preventing and reducing possible environmental impacts that may be linked to these.

  4. Verification and Corrective Action

    Once the system has been implemented, the organization must establish mechanisms for following up and measuring operations and activities that could have a major impact on the environment.

    The organization must establish and update procedures to define the person responsible and authorized to control and look into the non-compliances and carry out actions leading to the reduction of impacts or any corrective and preventive actions required.

    Lastly, the organization must establish and update programmes and procedures aimed at verifying that internal audits are performed regularly of the environmental management system.

  5. Management Reviews

    The management of the organization must review the environmental management system, at regular intervals, that are adequate to guarantee its efficiency and suitability. The review will be more or less important in accordance with the knowledge that was available concerning the improvement options before the planning stage. This may include reducing the goals, modifying policy and/or, modifying the documentation, if required.

3.2.3 Implementation of ISO 14000 Standards in the Mediterranean Area

Many Mediterranean countries have combined CP promotion with the with the dissemination of EMS. Many industries adopt the implementation of ISO 14001 to obtain the recognition of the expressed environmental commitment. Due to their divulgation capacity, the Chambers of Commerce also contribute to this process.

With some exceptions, the implementation of ISO 14000 With some exceptions, the implementation of ISO 14041 for life cycle analysis, should be considered as one of the most suitable tools offering access to international business, including business in the framework of the Mediterranean region

The ISO 14000 is a management system Standard but not a standard guaranteeing environmental quality. Its aim is to provide a general framework by which to organize the necessary tasks for an efficient environmental management, but it does not offer incentives for going beyond regulatory compliance, nor does it distinguish between if it has been achieved through prevention or by way of end-of-pipe treatments [33]. This is why, despite the fact that every company should have its EMS and that voluntary implementation of the ISO 14000 should be considered a large step forward, CP constitutes an excellent supplement for environmental quality assurance in an enterprise's performance.

3.2.4 The EMAS European

The European Union (EU) countries can choose the option of EMAS, the Ecomanagement and Audit Scheme, as a system to evidence and publicly reveal their environmental performance, which is not a requirement of ISO 14000. The first EMAS version was approved by the European Council as the Regulation 1836/93 (Ecomanagement and Audit Scheme). For the EMAS, an EMS is "the part of the general management system that includes the organizational structure, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources, to determine and carry out the environmental policy".

EMAS is an ecomanagement and audit scheme through which industrial enterprises can voluntarily assess and improve the results of their activities in relation to the environment. Once the scheme is adopted, an initial environmental audit is required (that is voluntary in the case of ISO 14001) an "environmental declaration" must be published and a verification process (certification in the ISO 14001) must be carried out by an accredited firm.

In 2001, the UE published a review of the initial text, called the EMAS II [35]. The new version, EMAS II, of the European Regulation EC 761/2001 "allowing organizations to comply voluntarily with an ecomanagement and audit scheme", establishes that an EMS will be implemented according to requirements. ISO 14001 enterprises that have the ISO 14001 Certification and wish to comply with the EMAS must bear in mind the following considerations:

  • Performance of an Environmental Analysis

    The EMAS requires a preliminary study of activities, products and services, aimed at identifying the environmental aspects as a basis to establish the environmental management system of the organization. It will be sufficient for the enterprises that have the ISO certification to consider the environmental aspects according to annex VI of the EMAS regulation.

  • Compliance with Environmental Legislation

    The EMAS requires compliance with environmental legislation. When negotiating the inclusion of an organization in the EMAS register, the competent body will check with the environmental authority whether the applicant complies with the environmental legislation.

  • Information to the Public

    This requirement for transparency of the organization towards the public, basically involves carrying out an environmental declaration. The environmental declaration constitutes a tool for communication and dialogue with the public or other parties interested in the environmental performance of the organization and its continual improvement.

  • Worker Participation

    The organization must involve the workers in the continual improvement of its environmental performance, such as by creating an environmental committee, a suggestion box, etc.

  • Improvement of Environmental Performance

    Environmental performance is a key factor in the public communication of an enterprise's environmental priorities and intentions, and must be put in writing and adopted at top management level. Then, the organization will prepare the reports and carry out a systematic, timely and objective assessment of the EMS using environmental indicators that enable to compare the evolution of its environmental performance every year.

3.2.5 Dynamics of EMS

The environmental management system EMS starts with the declaration of an environmental policy of the enterprise that includes at least the commitment to comply with the existing legislation and a continual improvement of its environmental management. The EMS implies a progressive and continual action in four stages: plan, do, check and act. It is often compared to the Deming wheel, which uses cyclic activity to progressively improve its environmental performance over time. The goals set in the EMS must be as quantitative as possible.

3.2.6 CP and Management Integrated in EMS

In order for environmental management to be as effective and efficient as possible, it is also necessary the integration of environmental management as part (not separately) of the enterprise's general management system.

SMEs are often loath to implement new systems because of their perception that these will interfere with their primary production activity. Sometimes, it simply requires the pressure of a major customer in the supplier-customer chain to encourage the supplier to implement an EMS. Other times, it is the evidence that with the increasing cost of treatments, waste stream minimization is the only possibility to save money, and this leads them to progress towards an appropriate environmental performance.

As most environmental improvements are achieved by simply applying Good Housekeeping Practices (GHPs), their implementation can emphasize reasons for becoming more widely interested in CP. The experience obtained through the adoption of GHPs will help to prove that the implementation of an EMS will not be a traumatic measure for the company.

As a result of the Directive for Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC), the UE has published a series of reference documents (BREF) [35] that describe the best available techniques (BAT) for the different industrial sectors. BATs are a series of techniques, activities, procedures and work methods developed and tested on an industrial scale, in order to be implemented in a specific industrial context, that aim to prevent or, if this is not possible, to minimize emissions, in accordance with the financial conditions that are feasible for the enterprise.

The iterative process leading to the publishing of BREFs includes the following stages:

  • Definition of the status of the production technology in the sector.
  • Identification of the key environmental aspects of the sector.
  • Evaluation of the most important techniques to solve these aspects.
  • Identification of the best environmental levels that can be achieved, on the basis of data available in the UE and worldwide.
  • Assessment of the conditions under which these levels of solution have been attained such as, costs, impacts on the different environmental media and main leading forces involved in the implementation of the technologies.
  • Choice of the best available technologies (BAT), the associated emissions and/or consumption levels for the sector.

As the choice of BAT must not be too costly, the preventive aspect is directly identified with the measures adopted by CP. Taking into consideration the financial side, that should not interfere with competitiveness, BATs may be useful as reference documents, the same as the publications of the United States Environment Protection Agency (USEPA) or of other agencies in European countries carried out individually, such as (ADEME in France, CEMA it Catalonia, IHOBE in the Basque Country, ENVIROWISE in the UK, etc).

3.3 Environmental Audit

The environmental audit is a key factor in EMS. It includes a systematic, documented, periodical and objective assessment to check that the organization, the management and the environmental equipment is in good operating condition and, in the case of the EMAS, for example, it ensures:

The concept of environmental auditing in industrial companies was the subject of much debate at the end of the eighties, largely due to the lack of transparency in the use of voluntary programmes (such as local versions of the international Responsible Care programme). In the absence of a clear international stand concerning the meaning of the audit concept (an incorrect use was already being made of the concept of energy audits when they were assessments, and on the other hand audits shouldn't be turned into inspections), and the responsibility of audits and the methodology to follow, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) took a stand in 1989 by publishing a practical guide [36] for environmental auditing and the definition of some of the main elements. These do no presuppose how a company should proceed, but how the audit should be carried out to judge objectively the performance of the enterprise.

Following are the main elements of the environmental audit (ICC) son:

  1. Total support from the management, that is shown openly in all the stages of the audit.
  2. Objectivity of the audit team, that implies being sufficiently independent from the subjects audited.
  3. Professional competence of the audit team, sufficiently qualified and experienced.
  4. Well defined and systematic procedures to guarantee a total and efficient audit of important subjects.
  5. Well documented process and clearly written reports.
  6. Assurance of the quality of the audit through appropriate mechanisms to lend consistency and reliability.
  7. Follow up of the facts identified through the implementation of appropriate measures.

3.4 Other Environmental Tools

3.4.1 Industrial Metabolism and Ecology

The concept of industrial metabolism was developed [37] on the bases of the analogy between biological organisms and industrial activities, and defined as an integrated and complete series of physical processes that convert raw materials and energy, plus work, in finished products and waste streams in a more or less stable condition. The economic system acts as a metabolism regulating mechanism through the price mechanism. The limited scope of the metabolic function can be developed, among other functions, until attaining the notion of industrial ecology.

The concept of industrial ecology is based on the analogy that can be made between the natural ecologic systems and the industrial systems. In the food chain of biologic systems, some organisms become the food source of other organisms and generally, the waste produced by an organism can be used as a source of material and energy for another organism. A mature ecological community behaves like a waste stream minimization system. Industrial systems and processes are also interactive. The waste streams of some processes can be used to feed other processes. The study of the material flows of an industrial system may reveal opportunities for recycling or the reuse of materials.

Industrial ecology seeks a global balance amongst all activities, beginning with the life cycles of products and production systems. A concept which is central in industrial ecology is the evolution of the industrial system from an unsustainable linear system to a cyclical system to achieve this balance [38]. CP would be included in industrial ecology as a further element of promotion of sustainable production and consumption.

Figure 3.2 Kalundborg Industrial Ecopark (Denmark)

Examples of this are the industrial ecosystems of the Kalundborg ecopark in Denmark [39] and the NASA Closed Life- Support System, suggested for space colonies.

Figure 3.3 NASA Closed Life-support System

Figure 3.4 Transition from an Unsustainable Linear System to a Cyclical System

A specific example of applying the concept of industrial ecology can be found in the reintroduction into the food chain of whey from dairy product manufacture, as described in MedClean file no. 40 (Egypt).

From a viewpoint of industrial ecology, it has been criticized that CP has two limitations [40]. The first is that it is aimed at existing production systems and the second is that it concentrates its action on opportunities that improve competitiveness while reducing environmental impact (although this is where the maximum interest of CP lays and the main reason why CP is accepted by industrialists). Industrial ecology would like to overcome these limitations by addressing its action to any sphere of the production system, including the initial design of products, processes and services, as well as all the environmental impacts, even those that do not report any economic profit.

3.4.2 Ecodesign

Existing production systems were the main focus of CP during the first decade of its implementation, despite the fact that in this period UNEP had made it clear that products were also included in its definition. Meanwhile, ecodesign was developed separately, focusing particularly on packaging and consumer products.

Ecodesign (and its US equivalent DfE, Design for Environment) integrates the prevention of environmental impacts linked to the product in the design stage. As it incorporates a strategy of maximum added value of the products, it is part of a wide eco-efficiency concept and can be translated as the aspect of CP applied to products [41] with the corresponding barriers and stimuli for its introduction [42].

An appropriate example of ecodesign is MedClean file no. 8, concerning the reduction of packaging cardboard consumption through ecodesign (Malta).

Ecodesign includes improvements in:

  • product concept and function
  • choosing materials with a lower impact
  • planning to reduce the impact of the production process
  • planning to minimize the impact of distribution: packaging and transport
  • optimize product use
  • minimizing management at the end of product life.

The design of industrial plants has not received the same consideration from the Public institutions, rather it is the engineering firms themselves and the manufacturers who have boosted the introduction of environmental improvement and the implementation of safety measures aimed at reducing all kinds of risks [43].

Various techniques have been developed in the specific methodology of ecodesign. The MET matrix (figure 3.5) and the Ecodesign Strategy Wheel (figure 3.6) are two examples of the tools used for the analysis of existing products and the assessment of improvements [44].

The MET matrix is a qualitative tool to carry out a functional analysis of the environmental profile of a product. In each stage of a product life cycle (from the production of raw materials to the end disposal) environmental impacts are introduced divided into three groups: material cycle, use of energy, toxic emissions.

The Strategy Wheel enables the main areas in which product improvement is intended to be viewed, evaluating the profile from 0 to 5.

Figure 3.5 Example of MET Matrix Applied to a Coffee Machine

Cycle of materials

Inputs/Outputs

Energy Use

Inputs/Outputs

Toxic emissions

Outputs

Production and External supply of materials and components

-copper (exhaustible material)

-zinc (exhaustible material)

-high energy content of materials

-fire delayers on printed circuits

-flow improvers for injection moulding

-benzene emissions

-isocynanide emissions in paint and gluing

Internal production

- metallic waste

- plastic waste

- process energy

Distribution

- energy for transport

Use

operation*

- plastic glasses (1,472 kg polystyrene)

- filter paper (90 kg)

- used coffee (2,944 kg.)

- plastic spoons (110 kg. polypropylene)

- cleaning material

- dirty water (4,160 l)

- water filters (20)

- inefficient energy use in the boiler

service

- parts that brake easily

- transport of maintenance service

End of life of system

recovery

- valuable parts are not reused:

- the boiler

- machine disposal (37 kg)

- packaging

- non-recyclable plastic (5 kg)

- printed boards (0.5 kg)

disposal

- printed circuits (0.5 kg)

- copper

- zinc

(*) values calculated for the consumption of 4 cups of coffee per day for 40 persons, for 10 years

(**) Elements requiring attention

Figure 3.6 Strategic Circle of Ecodesign

3.4.3 Life Cycle Assessment

For the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), the life cycle assessment (LCA) [45] is a method to assess the environmental performance of a product, process or activity, "from cradle to grave". In 1993, the SETAC published a Code of Good Practice as a standard methodology for LCA. In 1994, Directive 94/62/EEC of the European Council and Parliament, relating to packaging and packaging waste, supported the LCA concept as an analysis tool. Later, in the group of ISO 14040, an international LCA methodology was formalized.

The predecessors of LCA like others, can be found in the energy studies of the seventies, arising from the oil crisis. The first studies to include LCA components were carried out analysing the resources used and incorporating the environmental impacts of manufacture of some packagings. Later, these studies would lead to the LCA.

The LCA methodology has three main components, that have evolved to the present ISO 14040 standard:

  • analysis of Life cycle inventory,
  • impact assessment,
  • interpretation.

3.4.4 The Factor 4

Amongst the elements of environmental reflection, Factor 4 is of particular interest due to its relation with CP, goals [46]. Factor 4 means that the amount of wealth that can be extracted from a unit of natural resources can be multiplied by four. Productivity improvement by this factor will allow us to double welfare while halving consumption. Currently, this is prevented by a problem of inefficient use of resources, which needs to be remedied. These are basically cultural barriers that prevent advancing towards an improvement of efficiency in resource use. The key to eco-efficiency improvement lays in technological innovation, its spreading and the institutions required to promote it.

An example of inefficiency in production and consumption can be seen in a study by the US National Academy of Engineering, that revealed that around 93% of the materials initially used never become part of a product put on the market; and also that 80% of products were rejected after a single use.

On an international level, cultural barriers include:

  • The human factor, that can be the largest obstacle due to its inertia in taking action to change things.
  • The massive interest of certain capital in preserving existing structures.
  • Discriminatory financial criteria that requires a one or two-year payback period on energy saving measures, while a thermal power plant can have a payback period of ten to twenty years.
  • Lack of distribution of incentives between the person supplying the improvement of efficiency and the person benefiting from the improvement.
  • Lack of internalization of environmental costs.
  • A predisposition to organize and finance large projects rather than many small projects.
  • Obsolete regulations which, rather than promoting efficiency, put it at a disadvantage.
  • Very generalised practices in the regulation of services such as electricity, gas, water and others, leading to a prevailing use of resources rather than their saving.

3.5 Case Study: an Introduction to Design Based on SME Life Cycle

Even in a country as environmentally advanced as Canada, it is difficult to gather evidence that SMEs are complying sufficiently with a coherent environmental strategy. Although the spreading of the ISO 14001 standard could be taken as an indicator of environmental awareness, in some countries, it is rather a reflection of the position of multinational enterprises and their subsidiaries. This is one of the conclusions of a study based on a sample of 386 SMEs with some environmental awareness, distributed in four sectors of activity: printing, wood, metal and electrical/electronics [47]. The authors concluded that to introduce the design based on SME, life cycle, a five-stage learning curve is followed (figure 3.7).

During the first stage I, enterprises become aware of the need to reduce their contribution to the environmental problem of their production and to adopt some positive measures. Rather than being a systematic approach, this stage is characterized by improvisation. The actions taken can be qualified as reactive and are end-of-pipe treatments.

In stage II, the implementation of ISO 9000 can be considered as a preliminary step that is useful for future implementation of the ISO 14000, although the objective of the ISO 9000 is to formalize a product quality control system and meet customer requirements.

The experience gathered in the previous stage encourages the implementation of ISO 14001 in stage III, in a way that is even faster and cheaper than in stage II. There are similarities such as the concept of "zero defects" that becomes a "zero waste" concept.

In stage IV, life cycle-based product management is initiated. This involves a much more complex level of management that adopts a wide range of environmental initiatives.

This progress leads to stage V, that the authors define as leading up to the Environmental Declaration of the Product (based on a ISO 14025 standard and the ISO 14040 series, which compares products in an objective and verifiable way) and later to its sustainable.

Figure 3.7 The 5-stage Learning Curve

The assessment of the progress made can be carried out based on four mixed indicators of the level achieved:

  1. Green Design
    • Raw material
      • choose materials that can be recycled or that are less environmentally harmful
      • reduce the amount of raw materials
    • Energy
      • reduce the energy required to use/operate the product
    • Product life time
      • extend product life time
    • Ecodesign
      • design the product to accommodate it to many future users
      • design the product to make it easier to repair
      • design the product to make it easier to dismantle
      • design the product to make it easy to recycle
      • design the product to make it easy to manufacture
  2. Green Production
    • Requirements for suppliers
      • choose subcontractors based on their environmental performance
    • Energy
      • reduce energy required for product manufacture and assembly and
    • Emissions
      • reduce polluting emissions
      • treat or capture polluting emissions
    • Waste
      • minimize waste
      • guarantee proper waste discharge/disposal
  3. Recycling
    • Procedures
      • establish recycling procedures
      • establish appropriate procedures for hazardous substances at the end of product life cycle
    • Infrastructure
      • guarantee the existence of recycling infrastructures
    • Packaging
      • produce recyclable packaging
  4. Environmental Management
    • Policies and procedures
      • detailed environmental policy, in writing
      • proactive environmental policy that exceed the legal requirements
      • establish environmental goals that can be quantified
    • Monitoring
      • monitoring of environmental costs and profits
      • regular environmental auditing
      • regular reassessment of the EMS
    • Personnel
      • assigning of roles and responsibilities in environmental programmes
      • adequate training of personnel
      • wages and promotion of personnel based on environmental goals

Following are some conclusions from the authors of the study:

Of the four sectors studied:

3.6 Activities

Exercise 1

Choose the right answer, Yes or No:

  • The EMAS is
    • a European scheme
    • a world standard
  • The ISO14000 is
    • a European scheme
    • a world standard
  • The EMS
    • manages social aspects
    • manages environmental aspects
    • manages economical aspects
  • El SGA es un sistema dinámico de mejora
  • The EMS
    • is a dynamic improvement system
    • is obligatory use
    • obliges to comply with the law must involve the workers
  • ISO 14000 is obligatory use
  • As the name suggests BATs are a specific technology
  • Environmental audit
    • is not obligatory for all enterprises
    • is obligatory for all enterprises that are not SMEs
    • is not the same as an inspection
    • must be made available to the public

Exercise 2

Link the following concepts either to CP or to industrial ecology

  • Optimizing the flow of resources to the country
  • Pollution reduction at souce
  • Assessing an individual enterprise
  • Implying a network of enterprises
  • Reduction of risk to personnel
  • Recirculating whithin the same process
  • Promoting a global sustainability
  • Recycling between enterprises
  • Technical Government support for the implementation of BAT
  • Government support to help transfers between enterprises
  • Focus on an industrial sector
  • Multisectorial focus
  • Efficiency of a specific process

4 ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF CP

4.1 Objective

For a company's management to be objectively convinced of the interest in investing in CP, it must have a proper financial view of the cost involved in the generation of waste streams, and it must also be able to verify how the implementation of eco-efficiency measures will help the enterprise reduce these costs and make it more competitive. CP strives to obtain a financial and environmental benefit, simultaneously. However, many managers, due to lack of accounting evidence, think that the benefit of one of these factors will always act against the benefit of the other.

This chapter reviews:

4.2 Environmental Management Accounting

4.2.1 Environmental Accounting

Environmental accounting is a process for identifying, gathering and analysing environmental information, that offers objective support to management and decision-making when assessing the improvement made in the current management and in the planning and implementation of new environmental measures

The financial analysis of different CP options involves gathering all the cost and profit data that a project is expected to generate (tablas 4.1/4.2). This assessment is part of the information required to judge the most beneficial option, as occurs when comparing the financial benefits of various competing projects.

Tables 4.1/4.2 Inventory of Potential Costs/Benefits in CP Projects

Investments
  • Equipment
    • Process, instruments,

      storage

      laboratory, safety,

      etc.

    • Transport
    • Insurances
    • Taxes
    • Spare parts
  • Materials
    • Civil work
    • Pipes
    • Electrical
    • instruments
    • Insulation
    • Paint, etc.
  • General services
    • Electricity
    • Steam
    • Fuel
    • Water
    • Air, inerts
  • Preparation
    • Demolitions/cleaning
    • Disposal old equip.
    • Environment. measures
    • Equipment rental
    • Other subcontractors
  • Contingencies
  • Construct./Assembly
    • Infrastructures
    • Structures
    • Subcontractors
    • Rental of equipment
  • Engineering
    • Design, drawing
    • Programming
    • Accounting
    • Consultants
    • Purchases
  • Starting up
    • Consumptions
    • Personnel
    • Extras
  • Training
    • Preparation manuals
    • Training
    • Consultants
    • Suppliers
  • Permits
  • Working capital
    • Raw materials
    • Other materials
  • Recovery
    • Old equipment
    • Other
Operating Costs/Benefits
  • Materials
    • Raw materials
    • Solvents
    • Catalysts
    • Transport
    • Storage
  • Personnel
    • Workers
    • Supervision
    • Control
    • Maintenance
    • Quality
  • Auxiliary services
    • Electricity
    • Steam
    • Fuels
    • Process water
    • Cooling water
    • Air
    • Inert gases
    • Cooling/freezing
    • Black waters
  • Waste managements
    • Pre-treatments
    • Treatments
    • Handling
    • Storage
    • Final disposal
    • Waste management companies
  • Legal requirements
    • Licences
    • Inspections
    • Tests
    • Reports
    • Canons
  • Insurances
  • Liabilities
    • Penalties
    • Personal damages
    • Material damages
    • Environmental damage
    • Consultancy
  • Income
    • Product sales
    • (effect s of
    • product change,
    • change of image,
    • market participation,
    • etc.)
    • Byproduct sales
    • Valuation

Eco-efficiency in production means taking into consideration the environmental and financial aspects during evaluation and decision-making. In order to prove the benefits of the implementation of eco-efficiency in a CP programme, the first step is to adopt an environmental accounting system that allows to have a clear knowledge of a company's present environmental costs and their source.

Often, the knowledge of the environmental costs is not sufficient to make a decision regarding the introduction of possible changes. Conventional accounting systems do not usually offer a wide enough view of the source of the environmental costs or of the total figures involved in a specific activity.

In order to make a decision with full knowledge of the facts, it is necessary to resort to a cost analysis system [48]. That is why the accountant is said to be the person who can do most for prevention and for CP to succeed, although this may sound strange to some [49].

In order for CP investments to be able to prove their real financial efficiency, direct costs must include all the other costs that can be generated if CP is not implemented, such as the corresponding part of the costs registered as indirect costs, intangible costs, etc. For example, an enterprise can choose to pay for the landfilling of a toxic waste instead of reducing or eliminating its generation, simply because not all the real costs of disposal are assigned to the activity.

For the accountants' participation to be as effective as possible, it is recommended that they:

  1. Participate in the network of professionals that explore the implementation of CP.
  2. Come out of their offices and take a walk around the facilities to see that pollution is not an overall cost, but rather that the production of waste streams is a specific cost within the process.

4.2.2 When Should an Environmental Accounting System be Implemented?

It is not always necessary to make an additional accounting effort. For many SMEs, the traditional system may be enough if:

  • They manufacture few different products
  • They use labour-intensive processes
  • The direct costs are a major part of the total costs
  • They make minimal product or process changes.

It would be advisable to introduce a additional system aside from the traditional one, if:

  • The indirect costs are a major part of the total cost of manufacture
  • The environmental costs are significant within the indirect costs
  • A wide variety of products are manufactured in irregular amounts
  • Material requirements (particularly toxic), energy, labour, time the equipment is in use, etc. are very different from one product to another
  • The customers' requirements concerning quality, controls, service, etc. are very different from one customer to another.

4.2.3 How to Introduce Environmental Accounting in an SME?

Even when the final goal may be to achieve:

  • A total integration system of environmental costs in the budgets and in the analytical accounting information
  • A complete design of the cost allocation system to processes and products progress can be made step by step, starting with a limited package of objectives

The enterprise may start by working on the costs and profits that are most evident and better known. When a certain level of allocation and incorporation to the accounting system is reached, it may no longer be necessary to introduce the costs and profits that are most difficult to quantify. In any case, it will always be useful to have qualitative criteria for these items. Any effort made, aside from helping to evaluate CP projects, will also be useful for the overall management.

4.2.4 What Costs can be Identified as Environmental Costs?

The accounting system traditionally classifies costs in large groups, such as:

  • Direct expenses in materials and personnel
  • Indirect production costs
  • Sales costs
  • Overall and administrative costs
  • Research and development.

For various reasons, environmental costs can be allocated to any of these categories in the classical accounting system, usually as general costs, and can be difficult to identify. However, to justify the adoption of CP options, it is necessary to evidence all the positive and negative aspects of the option being evaluated. According to its characteristics and evidence, costs can be classified as:

General costs are those that are not attributed to a specific system, process, product or installation. They can include management salaries, auxiliary services, waste stream treatments, control laboratories, waste disposal, etc. Many of these costs are environmental.

  • conventional
  • potentially hidden
  • contingent
  • image

Conventional costs. These are the most evident and the easiest to take into account. However, a first identification problem in environmental assessments made a posteriori is that savings from lower consumptions of raw materials or a lower production of waste streams, attributed to a change following CP, will not figure explicitly as a non cost in the accounting, although it must be taken into account in the budgets and feasibility studies.

Potentially hidden costs. They are all difficult to identify if they have not been appropriately documented or imputed to the activity in the accounting. They include:

  • All the expenses produced before starting the operation (prior design of a better process, qualification of suppliers, etc.).
  • The costs involved in complying with the environmental regulation or the costs allocated voluntarily to cover or avoid future liabilities, that are often assigned to indirect costs (administration work, permitting, etc.).
  • The costs that have not been formally anticipated but that will necessarily arise in the future (closing and follow up of a landfill, etc.).

Contingent costs. These are costs that can arise or not in the future and, that can be described in a probabilistic way (an income expected in the future from the second hand sale of obsolete equipment, etc.).

Image costs. Aimed at affecting awareness of customers and the general public (public relations, corporate image, etc.). Although they can be measured, it is difficult to know what direct profits they will generate.

Table 4.3 shows a few examples of these environmental costs.

Table 4.3 Examples of Business Environmental Costs
Conventional costs: Investments, raw materials, personnel, auxiliary services.
Potentially hidden costs:
  1. Previous: research and development, engineering purchases, design, works permit, preparation of site.
  2. Regulatory: inspections, waste management, equipment for personnel protection.
  3. Voluntary: audits, supplier qualifications, relations with the community, insurances, feasibility studies
  4. Remote: closing the activity, selling inventoried material, landfill control after closing.
Contingent costs: Penalties, remedy for polluted land, damage to property, legal fees, environmental damage.
Image costs: Business image, human relations, relations with the community, relations with investors.

4.2.5 Searching for Environmental Costs?

All cost evaluations require a preliminary compilation of data. Although it may seem obvious, if time is not taken to previously define the scope of the project, the data required and where to find same, the search may be ineffective and incomplete for the evaluation. If on the other hand, time is taken to research these issues, the time used for the exercise will certainly be reduced to the bare minimum. Table 4.4 shows a list of suggestions to find out what conventional and hidden costs are necessary for the evaluation [50].

Table 4.4 Examples of where to Find out Conventional and Hidden Costs
Origin of cost Requirements Sources of information Contact

Raw materials

  • Use/production unit
  • Cost per unit
  • Production records
  • Orders
  • Production Mgr
  • Purchase

Training personnel

  • Persons/year
  • Training period
  • Training records
  • Job sheets
  • Training section
  • Personnel Dept

Production

  • Hours of personnel
  • Time spent per machine
  • Machine downtime
  • Personnel records
  • Production records
  • Budgets operations
  • Production Mgr
  • Personnel Dept

Maintenance

  • Hours of personnel
  • Time spent per machine
  • Personnel records
  • Maintenance records
  • Personnel Dept
  • Production Mgr

Insurances

  • Type, coverage
  • Premiums
  • Budgets
  • Contract, invoices
  • Legal office
  • Administration Mgr

Water consumption

  • Use/production unit
  • Cost per unit
  • Counters
  • Invoices
  • Production Mgr
  • Administration

Steam use

  • Use/production unit
  • Cost per unit
  • Counters
  • Schedules
  • Head of aux. service
  • Planning

Waste disposal

  • Type, quantity
  • Cost per unit
  • Declarations
  • Contract, invoices
  • Environment Dept.
  • Administration

Water treatments

  • Source, streams
  • Consumptions
  • Operation records
  • Counters
  • Orders
  • Production Mgrs
  • Purchasing

4.3 Support Accounting Techniques

There are various types of advanced accounting systems developed for management assessment, that are applicable to environmental management and can be used to support CP programmes [51], [52]. Following are some of the main forms applied:

4.4 Cost Allocation

Transferring environmental costs from the item of overhead (or indirect) costs to direct costs requires an allocation process of the environmental costs to the products or processes that generate them. The allocation process is important because, if it is not carried out properly, a process or product can bear costs that do not correspond to it and this will affect the real production cost or hide the financial incentive represented by a certain measure of CP. The more accurate the knowledge of the source of the costs, the easier it will be to show the management the implicit eco-efficiency of CP options and the interest in applying some measures.

The basis of cost allocation must be the identification of a cause-effect relation between the cost and the goal pursued with a specific activity. Cost allocation decisions must reflect precisely and quantitatively the basic ideas and criteria adopted jointly by the different departments of a company. It may be necessary for the allocation process to proceed in stages, for example due to crossed dependences between auxiliary services and waste stream treatments.

4.5 Financial Analysis of CP Options

When CP options imply investments, the part of financial profit implicit in eco-efficiency must be justified as for any other production project. In order to show the advantage of implementing a CP, option, it is necessary to apply the same financial analysis tools as those applied to the company's other projects, with which it will have to compete to secure a share of the monetary resources; and although these are always scarce, they are affordable if they boost the company's competitiveness. The criteria of profitability generally applied are [53]:

At the time the decision is made, the business manager must also bear in mind the intangible benefits, that are difficult to quantify but that are unquestionably generated by introducing CP measures.

Intangible benefits that can be achieved with:

  • Less liability derived from:
    • Sanctions
    • Personal damage and damages to property
    • Damage to natural resources and the environment
  • Better corporate image
  • Better product image
  • Better product quality
  • Better health of employees
  • Better productivity due to improved relations with the personnel

MedClean file no. 1 contains a good example of minimisation opportunities economic evaluation which completed the pollution prevention diagnosis in a car battery manufacturer's in Tunisia.

4.6 Case Study: Cost Allocation in ISO 14041

Generally, the technologists do not participate very much in the development of cost allocation methods [54]. However, recently the involvement of technicians has increased following the ongoing introduction of EMS and the implementation of allocation methods for materials and pollutants in the life cycle evaluation in ISO 14041 [55]. The goal of LCA The goal of LCA is implicitly to anticipate the environmental consequences of our actions. However, different forms of assignation of material consumption and waste streams in multifunctional processes result in different types of information, leading to a series of conclusions in the assignation processes that are transferrable to the allocation of costs.

A multifunctional process is defined as an activity that fulfils more than one function. It may be a production process with more than one product. It may be a waste stream management process including more than one stream and perhaps the valorization of a stream that generates energy. The problem with the assignation is deciding which part of the final environmental load of an activity must be assigned to each product or waste stream. In the environmental burden, the resources used and all the final emissions and waste generated are included. Assignation problems also arise when the material that comes out of a product's life cycle through recycling, ends up, in another life cycle, because part of the function is exported to the latter life cycle.

The conclusions reached are not always easy to sum up. Assignation based on causal, physical interactions (based on the production volume of each product, for example) between functions is possible if the functions are physically independent from one another. However, the assignation problem can seldom be solved with a simple division and will require using an expanded system. The problem of assignation is even more complicated to solve when instead of assigning materials, costs must be allocated: which cost is allocated to the product and which to the byproduct, since the market will only accept the byproduct if the price is low enough? The assignation must bear in mind the effect, however little, on the production volume of the function exported as a byproduct.

The expanded system, or an appropriate approach, may help to resolve the assignation problem. The latter can be solved if there is a production (generation) alternative of the function exported, that indicates what are the limits of the assignation. If for example, byproduct B can be manufactured in some other way, an excessive assignation would prevent it being introduced as a useful product and convert it into waste, loading onto product A in a much worse way. The alternative gives the extra information required to decide on the assignation limits.

The system shows a multifunctional process and the activities that can be affected indirectly by a change in the production of B. As the assignation cannot be decided considering the process, the expanded system is used with an alternative production that will allow to decide what allocation can be made to product B.

4.7 Practical Exercises

Exercise 1

  1. State if you agree or not with the following sentences

    Environmental accounting:

    • includes and substitutes classical accounting
    • allows to evidence eco-efficiency
    • works directly with indirect costs
    • is carried out regardless of the accountants
    • is not necessary in microenterprises
    • is not necessary if there is a small percentage of indirect costs
    • is more interesting if many different products are manufactured
  2. Indicate whether the following concepts must be entered as investments or as expenses

    • Transport insurance of the equipment to the plant
    • Insurance of the equipment operating
    • Power consumption during the initial start up
    • Power consumption during a maintenance break
    • Power consumption during the normal process
    • Power consumption during a training course
  3. State whether you agree or not with the following sentences

    • The cost of laboratory tests may be potentially hidden
    • Penalties are a conventional cost
    • Auxiliary services are a conventional cost
    • The Investment Payback Period (IPP) does not take into consideration the cost of money
    • In the Present Net Value (PNV) the initial years have a greater influence of an installation's lifetime
    • The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is independent from the life cycle of the equipment

Exercise 2

Calculating the Profitability of a CP Option Implementation

A company that uses a toxic category solvent is currently sending it for final disposal by incineration, with a total annual cost of €207,400. There are two options:

The first option is to send the solvent to an external waste management firm for recycling, with an annual cost of €149,800.

The second option is to purchase a still for internal recycling. In this case, the investment required is of €76, 00 in equipment cost, €50,600 in additional equipment, plus €13,000 for the assembly. Starting up would be immediately after purchase. The equipment has a 5-year life. The operating costs plus the cost of waste disposal amount to €104, 00 per year.

The interest rate is stabilized at 5.5%. Determine the economic interest of the options. Compare the profitability of the solutions proposed by applying various criteria.

The solution of the exercise is available.

As the operativeness of the second option is immediate, the purchase cost is included at the beginning of the first operating year.

Year

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Total annual cost 103

Current situation

207.4

207.4

207.4

207.4

207.4

207.4

207.4

207.4

207.4

207.4

Option 1

Total annual cost 103

149.8

149.8

149.8

149.8

149.8

149.8

149.8

149.8

149.8

149.8

Option 2

Total annual cost 103

244.4

104.4

104.4

104.4

104.4

244.4

104.4

104.4

104.4

104.4

Difference between

Option 1 and 2

(94.6)

45.4

45.4

45.4

45.4

(94.6)

45.4

45.4

45.4

45.4

  • Current Net Value ( CNV) of the costs in 10 years (from year 0)
    Current situation1,563 103 Option 11,129 Option 21,021
  • The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the saving, with the option 2 over option 1 (it is evident that the present situation needs to be changed for either option)

    IRR = 32.4%

    With the cost of money at 5.5% the second option is the most attractive.

  • Additionally, the Investment Payback Period (IPP) is of IPP = 140/ (207.4- 104.4) = 1.36 years; that is, 16.3 months

Exercise 3

Cost Allocation

In a electrolytic silver-plating process a cost assessment has been carried out based on activities (recorded in the financial accounting of the company as indirect costs) according to the distribution indicated in the following table [adapted from reference 9]. Specific costs were allocated to liquid streams (L), sludge (S), vapors (V), particles (P), worn polishing materials (G) and filtrates (T).

Determine the contribution percentage of indirect costs per stage and polluted phase. Use a Pareto Diagram (chapter 6) for a graphic representation of the most important streams.

(Note: the cost distribution is relative. It is referred to a calculation basis of 10,000 units that enables to calculate the cost distribution percentages with two decimals: 100.00 %).

Diagram of the Electro-Silver Plating Process

Indirect Cost Allocation (based on 10,000 units)

Stages Raw material Management Treatment Disposal Audit Labelling Laboratory Protection equip. Training
2. Stripping L 50 105 325 150 15 25 40 10 15
S 20 410 500 850 80 50 350 100 200
V 0 50 0 0 10 0 0 10 15
3. Acid washing L 20 40 100 60 15 5 15 5 5
S 5 95 60 140 15 15 50 25 40
V 0 50 0 0 10 0 0 10 15
4,8,10,11. Rinsing L 50 55 20 20 5 0 10 0 0
5,12. Worn polishing materials P 5 0 0 25 0 0 15 10 0
G 10 25 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
6. Soda cleaning L 20 75 85 65 0 20 0 30 25
S 10 180 275 350 40 25 150 45 100
V 0 75 0 0 10 0 0 15 20
7. Neutralización L 5 20 45 25 5 5 5 5 5
S 5 55 60 100 10 5 40 10 25
V 0 50 0 0 10 0 0 10 15
9. Silver plating L 950 90 125 100 0 25 0 35 25
S 300 265 325 525 50 30 230 55 150
T 0 0 0 80 0 10 0 0 25
Total 1450 1640 1920 2540 275 215 905 375 680

The solution of the exercise is available.

Stages Sum
2. Preparation L 735
F 2560
V 85
3. Acid washing L 265
F 445
V 85
4,8,10,11. Rinsing L 160
5,12. Polishing P 55
G 85
6. Soda cleaning L 320
S 1115
V 20
7. Neutralization L 120
S 310
V 85
9. Silver plating L 1350
S 1930
T 115
Total 10000

Pareto Chart

The first four cost factors represent more than 70% of the indirect costs registered. The influence of stages 2 and 9 is important enough to require prioritizing attention when looking for improvements.

5 CP METHODOLOGY

5.1 Objective

The most important characteristic of CP is having adopted a simple and coherent methodology that is easily applied in SMEs, CP is the successor of the energy audit methodology promoted at the end of the seventies, improved through years of implementation until becoming extremely efficient. This chapter:

5.2 The CP Programme

5.2.1 Definition

The CP programme is a continual and systematic activity aimed at identifying, assessing and implementing eco-efficiency opportunities in the production process. The programme is particularly adapted to SMEs, however, it is equally practical to introduce the eco-efficiency concept in any business, regardless of its size, although large corporations usually have their own programme, adapted to their particular case.

5.2.2 The Role of Management

For a CP programme to be effectively introduced in a company, it must have the support of the management, who must be convinced of its twofold interest: environmental and financial. This conviction can increase if CP is viewed as an effective means leading to the future introduction of an environmental management system (EMS) in the company. And if the EMS has already been introduced, conviction will be greater if the positive effect of CP in the EMS is considered.

It is up to the top management of the company to:

  • involve all the departments that are potentially affected,
  • determine and formulate the main targets,
  • appoint a person with leadership capabilities responsible for developing and implementing the programme,
  • manage the cost allocation system and penalization of externalities,
  • make available the technical and economic means required and prevent interference with other projects,
  • promote relations with environmental institutions and authorities,
  • monitor and evaluate progress.

5.2.3 Organization and Coordination

For a smooth running of the activities, the organization of the various functions of a programme are just as important as the methodology. Case by case, the assignation of functions will be determined according to the size of the company. The organization distributes the functions discriminately to a specific personnel, however, in small firms, the employer and manager may also assume many of the necessary functions.

The organization of the programme must be headed by a coordinator, or programme director, who will report and communicate with the top management, translate their goals and inform them of the results obtained.

The coordinator will preferably be somebody who has no other responsibilities that may limit his actions. According to the requirements, the coordinator may organize multidisciplinary management committees that will include representatives from the different departments of the company. The coordinator must bear in mind at all times, the following issues:

  • What targets are determined?
  • What human resources are available?
  • What financial resources can be assigned to the programme?
  • How to quantify the results achieved?

The committee's role is to bring together the different operating capacities of the company to gather information, knowledge and experience (table 5.1), identify areas of possible action, make specific recommendations and supply data for the technical and economic feasibility assessments. At the beginning of a programme, it is generally useful to incorporate an external expert who can provide experience in the methodology, in carrying out the assessments and who, without any internal pressures, will provide a neutral perspective of the situation. Once the programme is well implemented, a monthly meeting of the committee may be enough to maintain continuity of action.

Table 5.1 Knowledge and Experiences that the Qualified Personnel can Contribute to the Committee [57]
Environmental expert Legislation, regulations
  • Pollutant treatment
  • Disposal costs
  • Environmental risks
Health and safetyRisk to health
EngineeringProcesses and installations
Production and maintenance
  • Impact of changes
  • Descriptions of the plant and processes
  • Remarks on changes proposed
  • Operating details
LegalEnvironmental liabilities
AccountingCosts
Supplies
  • Costs
  • Inventory Control
R+DGeneration of options
Supervisors and workers
  • Feasibility of modifications
  • Suggested modifications
  • Remarks on changes proposed
QualityImpact of changes
External consultantsViewpoint/catalysing function
  • Transfer of experiences

5.3 CP Assessment

5.3.1 Definition

Assessment is the basic activity of a CP programme although it can also be carried out as a separate activity, aimed at encouraging the company to adopt a continuous programme. The main goal of a CP assessment is to identify and assess, through an intensive and well planned activity carried out all at once, the options for using the resources as effectively and efficiently as possible and minimizing the production of waste streams.

5.3.2 Assessment Team

The coordinator is in charge of organizing the team that will carry out the assessment. Should there be a permanent CP programme already in place, as well as a committee to represent the departments involved, the composition of the team will be discussed in order to gain support from these departments.

The assessment team must include members from each department, aimed at:

  • providing specific knowledge of each component,
  • obtaining contributions from all the departments involved,
  • contributing to determining specific targets,
  • bearing in mind and studying potential drawbacks,
  • solving within the assessment group any possible conflicts between the various parts.

This team must minimize the possible obstacles that may arise. Many of the obstacles are simply due to a resistance to change (expressed with sentences such as "I have always done it this way"), misunderstanding of goals or lack of knowledge of the financial and environmental benefits that the assessment can provide.

5.4 Assessment Stages

A systematic CP assessment includes several stages, divided into a number of tasks [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63]. It consists basically of the following stages and contents:

  1. Assessment Preparation
    • A clear statement of top management commitment and their support of the assessment

      It is essential for the management to clearly state its commitment to the process in order to guarantee the success of the CP assessment. Particularly in companies with a complex organization, it is up to the top management to involve all the groups that are potentially implied. Only when the top management clearly shows a positive disposition to implement CP measures, can it be guaranteed that the different organization levels will also feel committed to the programme.

    • Definition of final and partial objectives

      The objectives sought from the assessment must be developed in detail. Their definition may require specific participation from the personnel in the different areas of its implementation. Objectives are defined taking into consideration environmental legislation and current degree of compliance, technology used in the production processes, benchmarking information related to the products manufactured, human capacity available and imperative market requirements.

    • Organization of the assessment team

      The assessment team must incorporate members from all the functions involved and can also include an external expert who can provide his experience in other assessments and not be influenced by the routine of always working on the same installation. During the assessment period, it will be necessary to count on the participation of the operators at every level, because their continual contact with the processes makes them a source of good ideas for improvement. If the company includes a quality department, it should also be involved in the analysis, to foresee possible customer answers to any changes that may affect the real (or perceived) quality of the product. The preparation also considers the difficulties and barriers that can arise when implementing opportunities, as well as the solutions to these problems.

  2. Review of Process Documentation
    • Review of the process steps and units and their diagrams, including in end-of-pipe waste stream treatments.

      The process diagrams are the representation of the transformation of raw materials into products, that include the different units and main equipments, such as the source, circulation and destination of the products, byproducts and waste streams originating from the main transformation or other process operations, including internal recirculations and waste stream treatments (figure 5.1). It is necessary to check if the process diagrams available in the files, reflect the current situation and are complete. If there are none, graphic diagrams of the process must be drawn with field data.

      Figure 5.1 Process Diagram

    • Identification of raw material, water and energy inputs

      All raw material and ancillary material inputs must be identified, including water and energy, and their position in the process diagram. Flow rates and material loads must also be determined, as well as the amounts accumulated in the period chosen, in order to calculate the balances.

    • Identification of process, product and byproduct outputs

      As for the inputs, all process outputs must be identified in any form:

      • products
      • byproducts
      • waste streams
      • potentially hazardous waste streams
      • recycled to an external process
    • Identification of the final destination

      The final destination of waste streams is identified (to external recycling, landfill, etc.), their characteristics and if they comply with acceptable limits at the destination point, as well as possible liability of the producer and external waste manager.

    • Determination of the initial levels of internal recycling, external recycling and reuse

      The initial levels of material recovery will allow to complete the process analysis and compare it with the end situation after the CP implementation. The flow diagram and mass balances must include material recirculations, as closed loops within the same process. The materials recycled in an external process will be computed as an output. Reused materials are usually computed twice: once as a material output and then as an input.

    • Identify which stream should be given priority

      CP, like waste minimization, particularly requires reducing, and if possible eliminating, all waste streams containing toxic or hazardous substances. Streams with a larger volume of pollutants or less efficient operations should be given priority.

  3. Verify the information available with the field data
    • Carrying out a field inspection

      A field inspection is a first opportunity to inspect the operating conditions, maintenance level and cleanliness of the installations. It enables verification of the information obtained from files, diagrams and data sheets, in particular with regard to potentially hazardous waste streams.

    • Checking data on file and completing them with real data

      Field inspections of the information on process operation and instrumentation allow to check and complete the data on file. Sampling and analyses will enable comparison of the information available on file with the reality of the process.

  4. Analysis of Process Balances and Yields
    • Completing material and energy balances

      Balances of material and energy are carried out on the process units, groups of equipment or separate equipment, to verify the consistency of the data available or to obtain any data that may be missing. If the process is continuous and stable over time, a balance can be carried out of the most suitable period-such as a 24 hour-period for example. If the process is not stationary over time, it will be more difficult and the analyst will have to be an expert. Some simultaneous readings of inputs and outputs, without taking into consideration the residence time, will very likely lead to a false interpretation. In batch processes, the balance is made on a complete cycle or load. If possible, it is repeated several times and assessments are made on the average.

      ∑ material input = ∑ material output

      (without accumulation)

      ∑ energy input = ∑ energy output

    • Assessing the efficiency of material and energy use

      The balances carried out on equipment in which some kind of mass or energy transfer occurs, and particularly when chemical transformations are carried out, enable the determination of the real yields of the individual processes, diagnose process or equipment efficiency and determine the reason for a lack of efficiency.

    • Carrying out exergy analyses and thermodynamic (pinch)

      These techniques, unlike the energy balance that is based on the first principle of thermodynamics, apply the second principle and the analysis of heat transfer networks which allow to determine how far away the process is from the practical energy efficiency limits.

      ∑ energy input = ∑ energy output

      ∑ exergy input ≠ ∑ exergy output

    • Checking the potential for waste stream segregation

      Many of the problems of CP or secondary stream treatments can find an easier solution in an individualized treatment. In many cases, mixing leads to waste streams of more difficult treatment. Two individual waste streams could probably be treated more easily. An inert flow mixed with a toxic flow automatically becomes a toxic flow of larger volume.

  5. Identification of Opportunities and Technical Assessment
    • Identifying which options are most obvious

      Some of the options identified in the previous stages, will obviously be implemented straight away, particularly those that only involve a change in management, whereas others can also be technically disregarded immediately.

    • Identifying other options that are technically justifiable

      Between the obvious options and those that can be disregarded, there is a group of options that requires a more in depth technical and economical analysis before deciding if its implementation is suitable or not. Generally, this will require a meeting with the experts. Ideas can also be obtained from other sources such as suppliers, particularly when the options include a very specialized technological element. Options which imply a change of equipment must guarantee their availability, reliability and maintenance before they are implemented. The operators may require additional training. If additional amounts of utility services (water, steam, etc.) are required, their availability must be checked. If potential changes in product quality are expected, customer acceptance must be verified. If the productivity of the installation may vary, the changes must appear reflected in the calculations of the economic assessment.

    • Developing long-term alternatives

      Many potential options are not included in the group of presently implementable options due to economic or technological reasons. Options that are not a priority or an immediately selected target will be included in the CP programme and the best time for their future implementation will be decided.

  6. Risk Assessment
    • Assessing and comparing risks linked to the presence of toxic substances

      One of the goals of CP is to minimize production risks from toxic substances that intervene or are incorporated in the process (as well as any other hazards that are included in specific studies). Ideally, the evaluation of alternative product synthesis methods, aside from raw material and energy consumptions, will include a comprehensive assessment of the toxicity, persistence and bioaccumulation of all the reagents, products and waste streams for the options evaluated (case study).

  7. Economic Evaluation [7]
    • Determining current costs and anticipating future costs

      An appropriate selection of options requires completing the technical analysis with an economic evaluation. For economic evaluations, the investments required and the present operating costs are determined; however, it is also convenient to foresee costs for future disposal.

    • Carrying out financial and economic feasibility studies

      According to the economic criteria foreseen by the management (investment payback period, internal rate of return, present net value, interest rate of money, etc.) the economic feasibility studies are carried out of options that are technically justifiable. Additionally, other aspects that are difficult to quantify are considered, such as civil or criminal liability, and image improvement. An economic evaluation completes the technical study after which decisions are made and priorities assigned.

    • Determining implementation priorities

      Establishing implementation priorities is one of the most important tasks, particularly when economic resources are limited. The order of priorities determined can be discussed with the assessment team, bearing in mind:

      • legal limits authorized for all types of emissions,
      • potential risks,
      • amounts of waste originated,
      • reuse potential,
      • costs of waste treatment or disposal,
      • resources available.
  8. Plan of Action
    • Preparing a report with conclusions

      The results of the assessments must be documented and reported to the top management, who will authorize the improvements. The report will serve to check the results at a later date.

    • Designing a plan of action

      The plan of action must be prepared carefully, as for any other project of new implementation. The technical data and human and economic resources required are established.

    • Obtaining sources of funding

      Although some of the options are mainly of management improvement and do not require economic resources, others will require an initial investment. Usually, their implementation must compete with other operating requirements.

    • Implementing options

      The implementation of changes must be carried out as effectively as any other project.

    • Checking

      Once the changes have been implemented and the plant is operating, the correct implementation and the improvements obtained must be checked. New consumptions, waste production, productivity, product quality, costs, etc. must be appropriately verified.

    • Measuring progress

      The benefits obtained from the different options implemented must be quantified and the improvement reported to the management, to confirm its advantages and ratify/implement the CP programme.

    • Reassessment if required

      Exceptionally, it may be necessary to readjust the progression forecasts. Whether it is negative or more positive than expected, the experience obtained will need to be gathered for future options.

5.5 Case Study: Risk Assessment Linked to Toxic Substances

5.5.1 Risk Assessment

Around 100,000 chemical substances are commercialized, many of which have toxic and other dangerous properties. One of the priorities of CP it to eliminate, if possible, or if not to reduce the risk linked to toxic substances due to their use or their inclusion in products and waste sent for disposal. Although risk assessments vare particularly aimed at alternative forms of synthesis, if it is taken into consideration that the goal of minimization was to reduce the risk of toxic waste, these assessments offer another tool that can be applied to the CP of certain products (such as, pesticides) for which many improvements would be financially difficult to justify.

Risk is the probability that a particular substance or situation may cause damage under certain conditions. The risk is a combination of two factors: the probability that an adverse event will occur and the result of this adverse event.

Risk assessment [64] is a systematic methodology to determine the probability of adverse effects occurring, and to be used as a decision-making tool when environmental consequences can arise. It is implemented to assess the impact on human and environmental health when there is a risk of emissions to air of chemical substances. The risk assessment consists of four main stages:

  1. Assessment of adverse effects
  2. Dose-effect relationship
  3. Exposure assessment
  4. Characterization of risk

One of the basic requirements of the industry is to know whether a chemical substance is toxic in order to assess its potential impacts and the conditions to control it. Whenever possible, direct measures must be adopted. Often however, no specific information is available derived from toxicology studies. An effective technique for the assessment of risk or other properties, is to use a structure-activity relationship (SAR) and a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). Although these studies may prove useful when no experimental toxicological data are available, estimations are very uncertain. [65].

5.5.2 Experimental Risk Assessment Linked to Acrylonitrile

Acrylonitrile has carcinogenic properties. Carcinogenic risk assessment is expressed as a linear function of the dose. The slope, m, of the linear function is expressed as:

Excess of deaths = m x dose (mg of carcinogen/ kg of weight and day of consumption)

A study of the potential of acrylonitrile to produce brain tumours was carried out by Monsanto, administering drinking water with a certain amount of acrylonitrile to rats for 24 months. The results of the incidence of brain tumours in accordance with the dose in mg. of acrylonitrile supplied per kg/day of animal, were applied to a linear model, by regression analysis of the observations, to explain the excess risk associated with each dose level.

Dose (mg/kg day) Incidence of brain tumour Excess risk Linear estimation
0 1/179 = 0,0056
0,12 1/90 = 0,0111 0,0055

0,0028

0,36 2/91 = 0,0220 0,0164 0,0084
1,25 4/85 = 0,0471 0,0415 0,0292
3,65 6/90 = 0,0667 0,0611 0,0853
10,89 23/88 = 0,2614 0,2558 0,2545

Slope of linear model: m = 0,0234 (mg/kg day)-1

5.5.3 Application to Reference Values

Threshold Limit Values (TLV) are parameters developed to limit the concentrations of airborne chemical substances in the working area. The inverse value of the TLV can be used as an environmental index, indicating that a high value of acceptable TLV has a low environmental impact. The TLV, by itself, is a concept that is too simple to offer any information regarding what will happen when the doses are increased until they have adverse effects. And, it only refers to direct effects on humans through inhalation, and does not take into account effects through ingestion.

To determine TLV a concentration level is established that will not produce adverse health effects during a worker's life, with an exposure during an 8-hour working day and a 40-hour working week. The TLVs are established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) [66].

An alternative method has been developed by USEPA using the IRIS (Integrated Risk Information System) database [67]. USEPA uses inhalation reference concentrations, oral slope factors and unit risk factors for estimating substance toxicity. For overall estimates, it is based on the largest weight assigned to a table.

The assessment of potential toxicities uses an inhalation reference concentration. The inhalation reference concentration is an estimation of chronic oral exposure that will probably not have adverse effects during occupational lifetime. It is associated in some way with the TLV, the oral slope factor and the unit risk.

The oral slope factor is typically the answer to ingestion in a low dose region, that is the region in which a linearity between the 0% and 1% excess risk doses can be assumed.

The unit risk is the upper limit in the assessment of cancer risk during occupational exposure to a carcinogenic agent, at a concentration of 1 microgram/litre in water or 1 microgram/cubic metre in air.

In the IRIS, database, acrylonitrile is listed as a likely human carcinogenic (B1) with a quantitative estimate for oral exposure expressed with an oral slope factor of 0,54 (mg/kg day)-1 (that is to say, a person weighing 100 kg exposed to 100 mg/day has a risk in excess as compared to a person who is not exposed of 0,54 %). The unit risk in drinking water is 15 mg/l.

For inhalation exposure, the unit risk is 0,068 mg/m3.that is to say, for a population of 100.000 people, there is a 6,8 % potential in excess of cancer cases based on exposure during a lifetime at a dose of 1mg/m3of acrylonitrile.

The overall estimation in the case of acrylonitrile is 10,000 for the oral factor and 1,000 for the inhalation factor. The overall toxicity would be based on the largest weight, which would be the oral one in this case

5.6 Application to the Evaluation of Options

5.6.1 Exercise Organization

Experience can only be acquired through practice and therefore the ideal situation is through access to a real plant to perform an assessment exercise. Otherwise, practical experience can be acquired considering the similarities existing between a kitchen and a manufacture process (chapter 11). The exercise is a very general format that includes a list of queries to be made to assess options that will have been identified previously [1], [7]. Most of the questions can be applied to any type of production. The exercise can be carried out in a team or individually, although it will ultimately be convenient to organize a joint discussion on the results.

The number of options generated by the team can be more or less extensive according to the circumstances. There is no need for all the ideas generated to follow the same selection process. It is obvious that the emphasis must be on the most promising ideas. Common sense and intuition can help to screen the best ideas and eliminate those that are not really applicable or that are marginal. Others can be so simple, efficient, cheap and easy to implement that they will not require being studied in detail. And lastly, the ones that are left will need to be examined more thoroughly.

This preliminary process for the selection of options also allows to estimate what absolute improvements there are or to what extent they improve the present situation. An idea will also be formed as to whether the solutions can be implemented immediately, in the short, medium or long term. This is also the time when the members of the team can formulate questions streamlining the whole process of option selection. Some of these will be general questions and others may concern technical, social and economical aspects aimed at facilitating the final assessment and decision. It is always useful to have some examples to help to get started with the process; however, the team must establish its own series of questions, applied to the specific circumstances.

5.6.2 Technical Assessment

Is the option available?

  • Is it a technological option demonstrated in practice?
  • Can it be purchased?
  • What degree of reliability does it offer as a new technology?
  • What references does the supplier have?

Is this option applicable in this company?

  • Is this option compatible with the current process?
  • Are the equipments, materials, processes involved compatible current procedures, production lines and cycle?
  • What production down time will its installation require?
  • Can it create bottlenecks in other points of the production line or will the new option help to eliminate them?
  • Are the operation and maintenance requirements very complex?
  • Do we have enough physical space available?
  • Do we have the auxiliary services required or will these have to be enlarged?
  • To implement the option, will it be necessary to wait until the current stock of raw material is finished?
  • What are the training requirements for the personnel?
  • Will it require new permits?

Will it affect the quality of the product?

  • How will quality control requirements change?
  • Will it increase the number of rejects?
  • Will the product continue to meet the customer's specifications?
  • Will the physical aspect of the product change?

Is it a sustainable option?

  • To what extent will it reduce the toxicity of the product?
  • Will it be a long term option even if the market or legislation conditions change?
  • Will this option satisfy the requirements we can anticipate today?

5.6.3 Social Impact

How can the option affect the health of the workers, the neighbouring community and the environment?

  • Will the implementation of the option generate health and safety problems in the workers?
  • Will the work environment be safer?
  • Will there only be improvements, or can it cause new environmental problems?

Will the option be well accepted by the management and the personnel?

  • Does it require major changes or can it be well combined with the current procedures?
  • Is it included in the cultural strategy of company?
  • Will it improve relations between the personnel?
  • Will the option boost or hinder other goals of the unit?
  • Will the personnel's requirements (work shifts, experience, skills) be compatible with the current level?
  • Will it imply changes of personnel?
  • Will the current capacities still be required?
  • What training will be required?

Will it improve the company's image?

  • Will this option guarantee the compliance with the present and future legislation and regulation?
  • Will it help to improve the relationship with the neighbouring community?
  • Will it help to recuperate the market lost due to lack of a suitable product?

5.6.4 Economic Assessment

What investments are required?

  • Will there be sufficient capital to finance the change?
  • Will it require inventory changes?

What direct costs and savings does this option involve?

  • What new operating and maintenance costs will there be?
  • What storage, treatment and disposal costs will there be?

What are the intangible benefits associated with the option?

  • How will it affect the costs derived from activities related to the legislation?
  • Will duty and tax expenses decrease?
  • Will the costs associated with emergencies drop?
  • Will there be less down time in working accidents?
  • " Will the costs for high risk disappear?

Will the costs for high risk disappear?

  • Will the liabilities be reduced with this option?
  • Will there be less liability regarding toxic emissions?
  • Will insurance costs drop?

Will potential fines and penalizations be avoided?

  • How will costs and non-monetary benefits vary?
  • Will the public image improve??

Will the relationship with the personnel and neighbouring community improve?

  • Is the option an opportunity for more sources of income?
  • Do the new products open up new markets?
  • Will they allow to recuperate lost markets?
  • Can the new byproducts be used or sold?
  • Can the recovered products be used or sold?

5.6.5 Comparison of Options

After the assessments have been made, the team must compare the alternative options in a more or less structured way. One method is to build a matrix with the comparison criteria and the weighting that the assessing team gives them. A score for each criteria is given to each option and multiplied by the weighting factors, in order to give weighted scores in the matrix (table 5.2), that are finally added to give the final score.

Examples of comparison criteria that can be chosen:

  • Low investment requirement
  • Low operating costs
  • Interference with present operations
  • Easy implementation
  • Personnel requirements
  • Changes in final product characteristics
  • Reduction of toxicity/hazard
  • Improvement of production health and safety
  • Reduction of civil and criminal liability
  • Acceptance by workers.

When weighting the example, the relative importance of the criteria is first assessed according to a score from 1 to 10. Then the extent to which the option complies with the criteria is also given a score from 1 to 10. The product of both assessments is carried out to obtain the weighted score of each criteria, and lastly the partial scores of each option are added together to compare which option has received the highest score overall.

Table 5.2 Matrix for Option Weighting
Example of weighted assessment
Criterion

Factor

(1 a 10)

Option 1 Option 2

Points

(1 a 10)

Weighted

score

Points

(1 a 10)

Weighted

score

Low investment requirement 8 4 32 9 72
Low operating costs 10 5 50 3 30
Interference with present operations
Easy implementation 3 9 27 9 27
Personnel requirements
Changes in final product characteristics
Reduction of toxicity/hazard
Improvement of production health and safety
Reduction of civil and criminal liability
Acceptance by workers
Total 109 129
Ranking 2 1

6 GENERAL OPTIONS OF PREVENTION AT THE SOURCE

6.1 Objective

Each sector has its own prevention at the source options that are linked to the industry-specific technology; however, there are a series of options that are common to most industrial sectors. This chapter details the main CP options at different stages of the production cycle, which include:

6.2 Good Environmental Practices

Best Environmental Practices (BEPs) are a set of measures that are easily applicable to an industry and allow to improve its environmental performance. These are often a good first step towards promoting environmental awareness in a company, before going on to implement CP. programmes. Some generic GEPs can be determined that can be applied to any industry, or others can be defined for a specific industrial sector, although every company should design its own BEPs catalogue according to its particular circumstances.

Examples of the measures that many companies adopt:

  • To document the technical and safety data sheets of the materials that imply some sort of risk for the operators, including their physical and chemical properties, toxicology, seller's information, etc.
  • To have written and updated procedures of operation, maintenance and inspection, and apply the measures foreseen.
  • To document risks associated with the operations.
  • To carry out regular inspections of the physical integrity of tanks, recipients and equipment.
  • To verify that measures have been implemented to minimize possible breakages or accidents and for easy visual inspection.
  • To periodically inspect safety elements and alarms.
  • To make sure that floors are clean and obstacle-free.
  • To check that lighting is appropriate, etc.

There are several ways that can lead to determining a BEPs programme and they will depend partly on the coverage and the measures considered most important for the company, sector or institution.

Depending on the starting point, other companies prefer to include more specific or advanced aspects of BEPs, and therefore references can be found regarding:

  • The organization, such as how to establish an analytic accounting system in a company.
  • The human element, such as more participation from the operators in the planning and further emphasis on training the personnel.
  • Or elements that are more specific such as measures concerning the system with regard to issues affecting risk in operating areas.

A simple methodology is proposed for companies who wish to elaborate their own specific BEPs, programme, by proceeding in stages

In their Manual on Design and Application of a Programme of Best Environmental Practices (BEPs) in Industry[68], the Government of Catalonia's Department of the Environment and Housing proposes four TIMES (as in a musical composition) for the drawing up of a BEPs programme.

A simple methodology is proposed for companies who wish to elaborate their own specific BEPs programme, by proceeding in stages.

An example shows how a toy factory that wanted to implement its own BEPs programme, followed this procedure to identify a good practice that was simple to apply for the reduction of specific waste.

Step 1. The firm manufactures rails for toy trains. It has been noted that a large amount of waste is produced in the form of pieces of metal rail and faulty plastic parts. Definition of objective: to recycle 100% of plastic waste from the injection operation and sell the metal waste externally.

Step 2. BEPs would be to separate the metal from the plastic and classify it correctly. It has been decided to separate the waste in the selective collection containers and verify that there are no defective rails in the banal waste container.

Step 3. The assembly operator will be responsible for BEPs and will monitor the selective collection containers and the banal containers after each shift. Then a supervisor will check that the BEPs is being applied in case the rails incorrectly classified need to be reprocessed. The personnel involved will require prior training.

Step 4. The assessment of the BEPs application will be carried out by keeping a daily production report.

Another example of Good Housekeeping Practices (GHPs) is found in MedClean file no. 18, on pollution prevention in the dairy industry in Egypt.

6.3 CP in Process and Maintenance Areas

Potential improvements in the process and maintenance areas affect the procedures and the instructions, the people and the facilities [69], [70], [71], [72]. Some of the recommendations are common to all the sectors and processes (including the BEPs), but each sector has its own recommendations that are more or less specific to the process.

6.3.1 The Human Factor

Concerning the human factor, the following can be applied to the operation area and to any other area:

  • A good capacity building and training of operators is required in the activities they are involved in.
  • The operators must be well informed about why the operations will be carried out and the inconveniences that may arise if they are not implemented correctly.
  • The operators must understand that these difficulties may start by affecting their physical integrity and health, and then the nearby community and also the environment.
  • A good training must be completed with permanent communication between operators and supervisors.

6.3.2 Operations

The recommendations are intended to organize the documentation, with measures such as:

  • Documenting the operating control parameters.
  • Keeping a record of any leaks, spills, solutions applied and cleaning up cost.
  • Keeping a record of generation and handling of waste.
  • Keeping a record of the cost of waste disposal.
  • Record the solutions applied and the improvements obtained by preventing fugitive emissions.

Or they are intended for the execution of the productive process:

  • To assess and measure fugitive emissions in joints, covers, etc.
  • To check the existence and appropriate safety valves, internal blockages, etc. affecting the physical integrity of equipments.
  • To use sampling and analysis procedures allowing to recycle excess products after testing.
  • To avoid secondary storage of excessive amounts in process areas.
  • To segregate waste streams preventing inert waste from getting mixed up with hazardous waste.
  • To install equipments that do not produce or minimize the production of waste streams or spills or leaks, by:
    • Installing double mechanical seals
    • Using vacuum pumps instead of ejectors
    • Minimizing as far as possible the number of flanged or threaded connections
    • Choosing valves which minimize fugitive emissions:
  • Installing variable speed electric motors.
  • Installing instruments for on line sampling and analysis.
  • Installing advanced process control systems.

And in each sector, some examples are:

  • Optimization of chemical reactions.
  • When stratification and separation of the heavier substances to the bottom of the tanks may occur, the use of stirrers can prevent this (in some cases solubilisers/emulsifiers can be dosed).
  • Avoiding possible mixing of incompatible substances such as cyanides and acids used for surface treatments.

6.3.3 Transfers

Transfer operations (from trucks to tanks, loading of reactors, etc.) involve manual operations, some with toxic or hazardous substances, that should not be routine. Therefore, it is convenient to pay careful attention in these operations. Below are some recommendations:

  • To follow the instructions of the equipment and product suppliers.
  • To carry out extra training for operators on the transfer operations, capacity and use of each type of equipment available such as fork lift trucks, conveyor belt, flexible hoses, funnels, etc.).
  • To control leakage in joints and connections, and seal off any valves that are not in use, etc.
  • To use transfer pumps with mechanical seals.
  • To unload volatile organic compounds using submerged pipes.
  • To use vapour recovery systems in transfers.
  • To use appropriate electrical protection systems and for electrostatic discharges.

6.3.4 Maintenance

All the physical equipment of industrial facilities are susceptible to failure, the result of which is product loss, waste generation and the potential destruction of equipment. The object of maintenance is to keep the facilities in operating condition in accordance with the specifications [73], [74]. Failure may be due to breaking or degradation. In the latter case, a progressive lowering of the quality will lead to the product not being acceptable and to an increase of waste generated.

Good maintenance is as important as good operating conditions. In some sectors, maintenance accounts for one third of fixed costs. This shows the twofold importance (environmental and economic) of maintenance. Deciding on the optimum degree of maintenance implies a compromise between the resources allocated and the risk of failure, the deterioration of efficiency and the risk of originating waste streams. There are basically three types of maintenance programmes: corrective, preventive and predictive.

Preventive maintenance is carried out according to a scheduled programme. It assumes that the equipment follows some kind of statistical behaviour, includes periodical maintenance routines, cleaning and recalibration and includes scheduled equipment inspections that aim to detect and address risk conditions.

Predictive maintenance implies permanent monitoring of the conditions and characteristics of equipment operational status, and the intervention bearing in mind previous equipment performance. With the information from the inspection, future problems can be predicted and remedied opportunely and before they occur.

In CP, the assessment team must determine which combination is being applied and which option is most suited to the company's circumstances. The assessment team, in accordance with the head of maintenance, proposes the measures that will be adopted on aspects such as:

  • The need to introduce or reinforce BEPs in maintenance programmes.
  • What commitment will be adopted regarding possible maintenance programmes: corrective, preventive and predictive.
  • Inspection requirements.
  • Appropriate procedures for choosing materials, tests, design allowances (extra thickness) and tolerances, etc.
  • Capacity building requirements.

6.4 CP in Supplies Management

Supplies management, including purchase of materials and warehouse management activities (inventories), offers waste reduction options that do not generally require any investment or just a minimum investment [75]. A good management system can reduce the volume of stocks and therefore the necessary investment, as well as the storage space required. Storage criteria are usually determined according to criteria that may ignore the environmental factor, and also the economic advantages involved. A problem that is associated to the management of supplies is packaging, which is a source of waste streams.

Nowadays, the importance of customer-supplier relationships is well known as well as the role that the purchasing personnel plays in CP [69], [70], [76], [77]. Within the growing relationship of the customer-supplier chain, some production processes have implemented just-in-time (JIT) systems aimed at reducing, and even eliminating, intermediate storage. This is an ideal situation although in many processes, the lack of guarantee for compliance with JIT systems can lead to all sorts of problems such as stops in a continuous process, and negative consequences which override benefits expected in theory. Therefore, before implementing a JIT system, a complete study should be carried out of the associated benefits and risks.

6.4.1 Purchasing Options

Recommendations to obtain improvements:

  • Having a centralized purchase and warehouse system.
  • Defining criteria for purchasing and for relationships with suppliers.
  • Using technical and material safety data sheets.
  • Limiting purchases to current requirements bearing in mind expiry dates.
  • Minimizing the number of products required for the same use.
  • Purchase of low consumption or short-life products should be minimized.
  • Purchasing, whenever possible, reusable, remanufactured and/or repairable products.
  • Specifying purchasing clauses in any orders, which allow to give back products within specification or obsolete products for recycling or repair but that can still be used.
  • Specifying purchasing clauses in agreements, that force the servicing and maintenance firms under contract, to only use acceptable materials.
  • Agreeing with the suppliers that any unused product samples be returned.

6.4.2 Storage Options

Recommendations to observe in the warehouses:

  • To keep a record of all stocks and their movements.
  • To implement FIFO (First In First Out) systems aimed at guaranteeing preferred use of the oldest materials to prevent their expiry.
  • To store in appropriate conditions of temperature, humidity, etc.
  • To make sure that metallic drums are kept off the ground, to prevent corrosion due to contact with liquids from leaks or wet floors.
  • To keep the drums closed, except when materials are being removed.
  • To physically insulate and keep incompatible substances away from each another.
  • To avoid storing any products obtained, with characteristics that are not according to specifications and impossible to purify or recycle.
  • To negotiate for excess materials to be returned to the supplier or exchanged for new materials if they have expired.
  • To make sure to empty recipients before cleaning and to choose appropriate cleaning liquids and technique.
  • To use the storage systems for their expected use only.
  • To prepare areas of secondary containment.
  • To control breathing appropriately in storage tanks in which there are evaporations, or use pressurized tanks.

6.4.3 Packaging

Options that can be applied to help packaging management:

  • Use containers, drums, etc. that are reusable or recyclable and have the right size required to minimize expiry problems.
  • Choose packaging that allows to store as much as possible with as little waste as possible on walls, and that are easy to clean.
  • Keep a control of the amount of packaging used per production unit.
  • Use the appropriate symbols to provide easy recycling.
  • Use packaging that is recycled or made from recycled materials.
  • Avoid using packaging that contains:
    • substances that deplete the ozone layer
    • papers bleached with chlorine
    • printing components and packaging that include heavy metals or persistent organic products.

6.5 Changes in Materials

6.5.1 General

Changes in materials can lead to CP improvements both in the production process and the final product. One of the main goals is to use a substance that is not toxic at all or that is less toxic than the original substance, or easier to reuse, without overlooking that when an assessment is made of material substitutions, all the risk factors must be studied, such as flammability, explosiveness, etc. [78]. One of the most common changes of materials in CP is solvent changes (see point 6.5.4). However, a change in material is one of the alternatives that requires most preliminary research. Laboratory studies or pilot facilities and tests of the end product may be necessary before changes are adopted. When the change involves reformulating the end product, it will need the intervention of the marketing function and the user's approval.

Some changes in materials answer to a very general purpose, such as:

  • Using raw materials of better quality or pre-treated in the feed
  • Using raw materials of new specification that are recycled from other processes
  • Using different catalysts.

Other changes have a very specific purpose, such as:

  • Using high purity oxygen instead of air in transformations by oxidation/ breathing
  • Substitute cyanide baths with non-cyanide baths
  • Substitute the chlorine with oxygen, hydrogen peroxide or ozone in bleaching processes.

6.5.2 Review of Material Data Sheets

Reviewing the material data sheets provides basic information to begin looking for substitutes. One possible approach for reviewing material data sheets would be to ask the following questions:

  1. Is the material a high purity composition or a mixture of ingredients?
    • identify supplier
    • substances that require investigating
  2. Is the substance a health hazard??
    • acute, chronic toxicity
    • carcinogen, etc.
    • symptoms
    • water toxicity
  3. Does it present other hazards?
    • flammability, explosiveness, etc.
  4. Physical and chemical properties?
    • volatility, vapour pressure, etc.
    • special reactivity
  5. What conditions must be avoided?
  6. Incompatibility with other substances?
  7. Safe handling and cautions?
    • handling conditions
    • storage conditions
    • procedure in case of accident
    • fire extinguisher systems
    • personal protection equipment
  8. what final disposal methods can be used?

6.5.3 Reduction of Toxic Substances

Material substitutions aimed at reducing toxic substances are very important in CP. Some programmes focus specifically on these goals, such as the TUR (Toxics Use Reduction) programme [79], that is another form of pollution prevention. TUR offers various techniques to reduce the impact. Some specific guidelines have also been designed to reduce the risk associated with toxic substances [80].

Following are some examples of techniques suggested to reduce the impact of toxic substances:

  • Substituting incoming raw materials for less or non-toxic products.
  • Reformulating or redesigning the product to be less or non-toxic in relation to its use, release or disposal.
  • Redesigning or modify the process unit.
  • Modernizing the process unit.
  • Improving operation and maintenance.
  • Recycling and reusing, or extending the life of toxic materials by using equipment and methods that attach them to the process unit (a solid catalyst or an enzyme attached to a support).

6.5.4 Use of Solvents

Solvents are substances of general use in many different industries and applications:

  • Steam degreasing for cleaning of plastic or metal parts
  • Dry cleaning of garments
  • Cold cleaning of parts and equipments
  • Manufacture and application of paints and inks
  • Extraction processes in the food industry
  • Manufacture and use of adhesives
  • Manufacture of chemical products
  • Manufacture of pharmaceutical products
  • Printing processes.

It was understood that a solvent was an organic liquid of rapid evaporation at room temperature, with emission of volatile organic compounds (VOC). Today we also refer to aqueous and semi-aqueous solvents.

In order to avoid or reduce negative environmental impacts that are linked to the use of solvents, a major part of CP in some industries incorporates the eco-efficient management of solvents (figure 6.1) [81].

A solvent management system includes the following:

  • Inventory of the types, applications and amounts consumed in the company
  • What cost they represent
  • Emission sources and capture or destruction systems
  • Measurement and quantification of emissions and retentions
  • Situation in relation to the regulation
  • Updating of records
  • Assessment of improvement options
  • Selection of appropriate options

Figura 6.1 System of dissolvent management (ref: Main directorate of Environmental Quality of the Department of Medio.ambiente and House of the Generalitat de Catalunya).

The management of solvents is a process to improve the understanding on how and why a company uses solvents and how it can control and reduce its consumption of solvents and associated VOC emissions. Following are some improvement operations:

  • A switch to aqueous solvents [82], [83]
  • A switch to other organic solvents [84]
  • Improved use and control of emissions [85]
  • Improved capture of emissions from tanks and equipment
  • Internal recycling [86]
  • External recycling

A structured and systematic management system can be part of a CP programme, a separate activity or part of a complete EMS. For many companies, the increasing cost of solvents is as good a reason for implementing CP as for complying with environmental requirements that are more and more restrictive with VOCs.

MedClean file no. 30 presents a specific case in which trichloroethylene was eliminated from metal parts production, through its replacement with a non-toxic water-based cleaner.

6.6 Case Study: Non-Standard CP Solutions

In the implementation of CP the manuals do not always offer solutions that are standard or that can be applied directly. It is often necessary to find original solutions or adopt decisions that are not at all simple. The evaluator needs to have a general knowledge of the methodology for solving problems and adopting decisions, applicable to CP, the same as for any other area of technology management. He can, for instance, adopt the system proposed by Edward Deming for the industrial quality area, that consists of the following steps: Planning, Acting, Checking and Reviewing (PACR). This system is also applied to the planning of EMS (chapter 3).

6.6.1 Solving Stages

A theoretical distinction is often made between routine or non-routine problems, problems that can be described mathematically or not, etc. However, it generally includes the following stages and sub-stages [87]:

  1. Definition of the problem toxic waste, excessive energy consumption, etc.):
    • Perception of an unsatisfactory situation (= problem)
    • Identification, understanding and description of the problem (components, structure, limits)
    • Studying the problem (details, causes, factors, consequences)
    • Definition of decision elements (goals, priorities, restrictions)
  2. Seeking of solutions
    • By chance or similarity to other problems solved previously (databases, references, experts)
    • Use of solution routines (such as the 7 diagrams of quality problems; section 6.6.2)
    • Producing new solutions and alternatives with innovative tools: brainstorming, brainwriting, the affinities diagram, etc.
    • Determination of needs for applied experimental research
    • Technological feasibility
    • Verification that the needs have been met
  3. Assessment of solutions and decisions adopted
    • Pre-selection of proposals for alternative solutions
    • Comparing solutions and improvement of solutions
    • Application of assessment criteria (environmental, economical, social, commercial)
    • Weighing up the benefits of application and critical evaluation
    • Decision and adoption of a solution
  4. Implementation of the solution adopted
    • Information, motivation and training of parties involved
    • Organization, planning and programming over time
    • Implementation
    • Control of results
    • Study of results

6.6.2 The Seven Tools of Statistical Quality Control

The seven tools of Statistical Quality Control [88] have a direct application in CP to improve the performance of a process plant through statistical process Control [89]. Because manufacturing products within quality margins means not having to reuse any material or re-manufacture the product or, in the worst of cases, having to send the entire product as a waste stream. Furthermore, the seven tools have an individual application as tools in the CP assessment process and more generally in the EMS.

The seven tools are:

  1. The Flow Chart

    The flow chart shows the relationships between the elements of a system, such as the interdependences between the activities of a process or the flow diagram of materials in a process. This is commonly used by all the technology sectors.

    Figure 6.2 Example of flow chart

  2. Cause-Effect Diagram

    Also known as the Fishbone or the Ishikawa diagram, after its inventor, the cause-effect diagram seeks to establish a relationship between an effect and all its possible causes in order to identify the one that could be causing a negative effect. The causes are generally represented in four (or six) main groups. Therefore using the 4 Ps: policies, procedures, personnel, plant; the 4 Ms: materials, machines, methods, manpower (6 Ms, if measurements and maintenance are included, for example). For its representation, it is often useful to have the corresponding Pareto chart.

    Figure 6.3 Example of diagram cause-effect (6 M)

  3. Pareto Chart [23] and [24]

    The Pareto chart classifies the categories in decreasing order. Pareto discovered that in many cases a ratio of approximately 80-20 could be established between factors. For example, in a warehouse 20% of the products account for 80% of the value of the products stored. Pareto's chart is used to pinpoint the problems requiring prioritization.

    Figure 6.4 Example of application of the principle of Pareto

    Contribution of the different stages of the process from the contamination of residual waters of a factory. The graph allows to observe that of 100 stages, nº 8 contributed to the 35% of all the polluting load (like DQO), and between the three stages of greater polluting load to the 2/3 of the total, which describes to these stages like as preferred attention looking for a reduction of the polluting load of the company

  4. Frequential Distribution Histogram of Measurements

    The histogram is a graph that is commonly used in statistics to represent the type of frequential distribution of measurements, such as the measurements of a mass-produced screw. In many cases, a normal distribution or Gauss bell distribution would be ideal.

  5. Correlation Diagram or Function Between Two Variables

    The correlation or dispersion diagram is used to determine if two measurements are related or if there is a correlation between two data groups. Correlation can take place if there is a cause-effect relationship, a relationship between two causes, etc. The direction and grouping indicate the strength of the relation.

  6. Trend Graph

    The trend graph shows how a measurement varies over time. Notations are made in the same chronologic order as the measurements.

  7. Control Graph of Mean Values of Measurements Between Limits

    As with the trend graph, it allows to study the variations that occur in a repetitive process. The graph shows the mean values of the measurement and the upper and lower control limits.

6.7 Activities

Exercise 1

Indicate whether the following sentences are correct or not:

  • Best Environmental Practices (BEPs) can be applied to all companies
  • All CP options are included in GEPs
  • All BEPs options are included in CP
  • There are always people behind GEPs
  • Packagings are the subject of waste management and not of CP
  • Mixing waste streams can sometimes solve the problem
  • It is always necessary to segregate waste streams and treat them separately
  • Personnel in the purchase department must not be involved in CP
  • Good warehouse personnel also apply eco-efficiency
  • The toxicity of a substance is a good reason to consider it a prioritry
  • Organic solvents are always well substituted with other aqueous solvents

Exercise 2

Determining the causes of inefficiency

Classify in the proper category the following sentences that are commonly heard in a company when asked about the causes of inefficiency:

Category:

  • Technology
  • Process design
  • Equipment
  • Operations and maintenance
  • Supplies
  • Personnel
  • Product
  • Planning of waste streams.

Sentences:

  • The equipment is always switched on for it be kept ready
  • The drums are thrown out so as not to have to clean them
  • All the equipments purchased were as inexpensive as possible
  • The iron of the tank becomes rusty and soils the product
  • For every kg of product, there are x kg of byproduct that we do not know what to do with
  • The tap drips but does not lose too much liquid
  • The tank overflows because the level indicator gets stuck
  • The quality of the product that we manufacture is too high and therefore it is not very saleable
  • The equipments were placed too close together
  • They work 12-hour shifts
  • We have to walk halfway across the facilities to take the material from one stage to the next
  • It does not come out too well because the installation has grown too small
  • These drums are full of material we no longer use, but a large quantity was bought to obtain a better price
  • It was ruined because of the sun shining on it in the warehouse yard
  • We changed raw material but not the way in which it was processed
  • The lubricant is not replaced often enough
  • They carry out tasks for which they are not trained
  • I was not aware that there was a better equipment on the market
  • The material we use is so cheap it never arrives in good condition
  • It splashes because the retaining plates are missing
  • They don't take more interest because they don't know if they will still be here tomorrow
  • Sometimes the material is too damp
  • We have had to buy another product because they wouldn't supply the one we wanted
  • It would be better with a different equipment, but we don't have enough money
  • The varnish cannot be used because it has dried up in the warehouse
  • We have to purify the product unnecessarily, otherwise we do not have an acceptable analytical method
  • This is the way it has always been done
  • There is not much room because we have had to add another unit
  • We do not fill the drum up completely because we don't have enough material prepared
  • The way it is designed does not meet the demand very well
  • The only important thing is to get the material out, whatever it takes
  • We know the part should be replaced every three months to avoid machine stoppages, but the boss prefers to make it last as long as possible
  • It gets returned due to its excessive toxic waste content
  • We get no recognition for doing things well
  • We cannot fully load the dryer because the corresponding washing machine is a size smaller
  • The customer says this packaging is necessary for quality in transport
  • We do not like anyone sticking their nose in our process
  • We were not aware that it could also be purified with this other method
  • You get paid the same whether the job is well done or not
  • We use a hose to wash out any solids that are on the floor
  • The personnel in this plant are very low-skilled
  • We spin for 10 minutes more to guarantee the product is dry
  • There is nowhere to train operators
  • A lot of heat is wasted with the water that is discharged at 80ºC
  • We are too dependent on temporary workers
  • All the wastewaters are mixed and then sent to the treatment plant
  • The owner doesn't even know what goes on in this section
  • They work in things for which they are not prepared

7 CP IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY

7.1 Objective

The chemical industry typically operates around a reactor, the key element of chemical processes, in which the molecules are transformed into other molecules according to a well defined stoichiometry. The modern chemical industry is partially linked to the oil industry, highly present in a number of Mediterranean countries, This linkage is used to increase the added value and improving the economic cost effectiveness of exportations. In fact, the unit processes of oil refining are the same as in the chemical industry, even more specific for a certain goal. The relevance in the Mediterranean region of the fertilizer production industry must also be mentioned, as well as the tradition of other industries such as the tanning and the textile finishing industries. Many other industrial sectors include chemical transformations in their technology, that are integrated in their particular manufacturing processes. Due to its complexity, economic value and environmental impact, the chemical industry has been the subject of many studies to improve its eco-efficiency.

This chapter:

7.2 The Chemical Industry in the Modern World

It is difficult to conceive today's world without the chemical industry. Its contribution was essential for the progress of modern society and to improve the quality of life, and provides work, either directly or indirectly, to a considerable percentage of the population.

Below are some examples of this contribution:

  • Synthesis of fertilizers and pesticides, which has ensured the food supply to a world in demographic expansion.
  • Organic synthesis, which has provided many medicinal substances for health.
  • The plastic and synthetic fibre industry which has increased the availability of materials and fabrics.

Like these, we could also mention a long list of sectors, from technologies that are more related to the extraction of minerals or the obtaining of natural products, to products incorporated in a variety of industries: metallurgy, paper, etc.

However, the benefits of this industry have been trivialized. On the other hand, the growing production that initially ignored environmental issues, has made evident the unwanted secondary effects of the production systems adopted. The need to correct its impacts and the interest in the sector to regain a favourable image, has led this sector to anticipate the implementation of eco-efficient measures. For many years, references can be found in chemical industry publications, introducing prevention at the source and minimization as preferred initiatives for the prevention of environmental impacts, and viewing waste streams as a clear sign of loss of cost effectiveness [42], [43], [44], [45].

Before confronting the environmental problems, the chemical industry had already been forced to solve its industrial safety and health problems, that were often associated with environmental problems. Therefore, this sector has a multiple and additional interest in CP, as well as an interest in the conservation and efficient use of materials and energy, of which the chemical industry is a large consumer.

7.3 7.3 Chemical Processes

Chemical processes combine different types of unit operations (described in many basic operations and chemical reaction engineering manuals).

Some of them are:

  • Operations of transport, reception and storage of materials and products to and from the chemical plant, and transfer operations between units and equipments.
  • Operations of physical preparation of raw materials before the reaction, either to purify, dilute or concentrate them, prepare the thermodynamic conditions for the reactions, etc.
  • The chemical reaction stage itself, with or without catalyst, seeking maximum yield and selectivity. This is usually the critical stage allowing for improvement of the material intensity of the process (defined as the amount of material consumed per production unit).
  • Another group of physical operations to separate, purify, recover, etc. the products from the reaction, including possible recycling of unreacted raw materials.
  • End-of-pipe wastewater treatment operations and transport for recycling in another process, external recycling or final disposal.
  • A heat exchange system aimed at improving energy intensity in the process (amount of energy used per production unit).
  • A monitoring and control system.

7.4 The Origin of Environmental Impacts

Chemical reactions do not often take place in one direction only, from one molecule to another. Atoms and activated radicals can generally be combined in more than one way, in so-called parallel or sequential reactions. The result is the formation of byproducts along with the desired product. When the byproducts have no application, they become residues (table 7.1).

Table 7.1 Waste Stream Sources in the Chemical Industry
  • Unreacted raw materials
  • Impurities in the reagents
  • Byproducts that no longer have an application
  • Used auxiliary materials (catalysts, solvents, other)
  • Products out of specification
  • Materials generated during process start-ups or shutdowns
  • Product manufacturing changes in batch equipment
  • Materials generated by process disturbance due to external causes (temperature changes, power failures)
  • Materials generated from inappropriate operation: handling, sampling, storage or treatment
  • Spills and leaks from tanks, equipments or connections in piping, open drains
  • Fugitive emissions
  • Incorrect secondary containment
  • Dismantling of equipment
  • Maintenance materials and waste
  • Monitoring and control failures.

Therefore, it is necessary to seek a way to increase their material efficiency, understood as the relationship between the sum of products and the sum of raw and auxiliary materials introduced in the process, and prevent process inefficiency conditions (table 7.2).

Table 7.2 Conditions that Generate most Waste Streams

Waste stream generation is much more likely if:

  • The products or processes are complex
  • The thermodynamic conditions (pressure and temperature) are far from the environmental conditions
  • Extreme purity (maybe unnecessary) is required from products
  • Many solvents and various other auxiliaries (catalysts, etc.) are required
  • It is a batch process
  • Lack of integration with the rest of installations.

Material efficiency (the opposite of the material intensity, or raw material consumption per unit of product) varies widely depending on the industrial segment (table 7.3) involved.

The chemical industry, a large consumer of energy, works for the conservation and energy efficiency of processes, to improve energy intensity (amount of energy used per production unit). For economical reasons, in the past the direct application of renewable energies was carried out in very few situations, despite the fact that there was specific research such as solar energy applied directly to chemical processes requiring high temperatures.

Table 7.3 Manufacturing Efficiency According to the Industrial Segment [96]
Industrial segment

Production volume (Tonnes)

Material efficiency (kg/kg  %)

Refinery 106 -108 90 %
Bulk chemistry 104 -106 20-50 %
Fine chemistry 102 -104 2-20 %
Pharmaceutical 101 -103 1-4 %

The chemical industry has many environmental impacts:

Some environmental impacts of global importance, caused by the chemical industry, are receiving particular treatments. Such is the case of:

The complexity of the integrated treatment of all sorts of emissions from the chemical industry, favours the introduction of eco-efficiency, implemented relatively easily by large corporations. This very complexity has made it difficult for SMEs to advance in this sector, and the CP methodology offers them an appropriate way to progress.

7.5 Green Chemistry

The name of green chemistry has probably gained the most adepts when referring to the development of new product synthesis [97], [98], [99], [100] which take into consideration the environmental issue from the first research level of new processes. Green chemistry, also known as benign chemistry, or sustainable chemistry, aims to develop forms of synthesis that apply, whenever possible:

The principles of green chemistry are detailed in table 7.4

Table 7.4 The Principles of Green Chemistry
  1. Pollution prevention is better than end of pipe treatments.
  2. The synthesis methods of chemical products must be designed to incorporate as much as possible to the product, all end materials used in the process.
  3. The synthesis of chemical products must use and generate substances with little or no toxicity for human health or the environment.
  4. Chemical products must be designed to preserve their functionality and efficiency, while reducing their toxicity.
  5. The use of auxiliary substances must be avoided or minimized and, when they are necessary, they should be innocuous.
  6. Energy requirements should be minimized and their environmental and economic impact assessed. Synthesis methods must performed at room temperature and pressure.
  7. The raw materials used and the natural resources consumed must preferably be renewable, providing they are economically and technically viable.
  8. Processes based on direct reactions are preferable to those that require intermediate reactions to be carried out.
  9. Catalytic reagents should be as selective as possible, in order to prevent the formation of unnecessary byproducts.
  10. Chemical products must be designed in such a way that they are not persistent in the environment at the end of their life time and that their degradation products are harmless.
  11. Analytic methodologies must enable to control real time processes in order to detect a possible formation of toxic substances.
  12. Substances and the way in which they are used in a chemical process, must be chosen to minimize the potential risk of chemical accidents, including leaks, explosions and fires.

The implementation of the optimization concept, either from experience or using mathematical approach, had been easily introduced in process engineering as an almost essential design tool. However, the characteristics of chemical science in the laboratory did not make the optimization of the synthesis method too easy. In research laboratories, the focus was on obtaining a molecule through a reasonably economical method, without giving the importance required from byproducts in transformations.

Increasingly, aware of the environmental implications of the synthesis method, and of the advantages and disadvantages they can represent for a company with regard to its competitors, applied research centres have adopted the new philosophy of designing processes and chemical products aimed at reducing material use and/or eliminating waste generation, while increasing health and safety in all the production stages.

A careful study of the possibilities of new and more sustainable synthetic methods can be achieved for example by using the Green Chemistry Expert System and green chemistry databases available [101].

Some of the conditions required to consider chemistry as "green", are achieved in the process development stage, when a framework of cooperation is established between laboratory researchers and chemical engineers, which can lead to improvements in order to achieve:

  • integration of the synthetic method
  • energy efficiency (first and second principle)
  • process controllability and safety conditions
  • robustness inherent to the process.

Within the eagerness to innovate, the following options are suggested as alternatives to classic processes:

  • biotechnology
  • ultrasounds and microwaves as process energies
  • reactions without solvents or using supercritical solvents
  • solid phase synthesis, etc.

Another technique that is finding new applications is electrochemistry. For example, an Israeli company has introduced radical changes in the production of an acid by electrolysis. MedClean file no. 38 contains a description of these changes.

7.6 Hierarchical Methods in Process Design

The configuration of a chemical process is finally decided in the design stage. Several methods are suggested that are actually not very different from one another and establish a hierarchy of decisions aimed at developing a logical selection approach of possible options. The hierarchical methods start by braking down the design into smaller sections, which are then treated sequentially.

The first method of hierarchic design was proposed by Douglas [102] and divided the complex process synthesis, proceeding according to the following levels of decision:

One of the various alternatives suggested to modify or increase the process synthesis proposed by Douglas is the onion diagram [103] by Smith and Petela (Figure 7.1), that analyzes, in concentric layers from the centre outwards, the following components: reactor, separation and recycling, heat exchanger network and utilities.

Figure 7.1 Onion Diagram

7.7 Transformation in the Chemical Reactor

Many chemical transformations do not lead to a simple product. Along with the main reaction, serial and/or parallel reactions occur that produce secondary substances, that become byproducts or waste. Research is therefore aimed at finding optimal conditions of reactor, temperature, residence time, catalyst, etc. to achieve:

  1. efficient raw material conversion
  2. good selectivity in the production of the most interesting substances

Five potential sources of byproduct formation and/or waste streams (according to their possible use or rejection) in the chemical reactors, can be distinguished:

Performance improvement and the reduction of residual byproducts has been widely studied. Several manuals [104], [105] and [106] offer detailed analyses of these possibilities. Assessment starts by identifying the determining factors of the reactions [107], [108].

  • Identify all potential reactions, if they are single, sequential or parallel, the order of each reaction, the kinetic coefficient and activation energy.
  • Determine if the reactions are reversible or irreversible.
  • In the case of reversible reactions, how the percentage of reagents fed affect the conversion in equilibrium.
  • Determine if the reactions are endothermic and how temperature affects the conversion in the equilibrium.
  • How the inert concentration of affects the conversion in the equilibrium.
  • In the case of reactions in the gas phase, how the pressure affects the conversion in the equilibrium.
Table 7.5 Reactor Conditions which Minimize the Formation of Byproduct for Parallel Reactions
Table 7.6 Reactor Conditions which Minimize By-Product Formation in Series Reactions

Then the principles of engineering science must be applied to:

7.8 Use of Catalysts

Similarly, green chemistry has also set its goal on catalysis [109], [110]. Catalysts play an increasingly important role in improving the selectivity of reactions and can be the most important factor for the new approach for substance synthesis. The interest is particularly in catalyzed reactions in the heterogeneous phase, such as in the case of a solid catalyst in reacting gases, because an additional advantage is that the catalyst does not generally require a separation stage to recover it.

PAs an example, one of the most important branches of catalysis focuses on oxidation processes. Generally, oxidations are produced with low selectivity, because many oxidation reactions use molecular oxygen as an oxidising agent. Oxygen is economically advantageous due to its easy availability, however it also presents technical problems. One of these problems is the high activation barrier, which can be improved with catalysis. Another problem is that thermodynamics usually favour total oxidation with the formation of carbon dioxide and water as end products. This is a circumstance that is not very selective for producing partially oxidized substances. Catalytic oxidations also offer a reasonable improvement. The combination of appropriate reagents and catalysts leads to technically favourable solutions. Therefore, for example, a zeolite-based catalyst combined with an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide can activate many hydrocarbons, leading to advantages such as selectivity of the desired isotopic form, easy product recovery, byproduct separation and possibility of regenerating the catalyst.

The ideal catalyst would be perfectly selective and not require solvents. Although it is impossible to reach an ideal state, there can be an asymptotic approach. Aside from the imperfections in the selectivity and need for solvents, there is also a problem of progressive disactivation of the catalysis.

Another advance related to catalytic reactions is the use of water instead of organic solvents. Water is a good coordination liquid for many catalytic materials. Many reactions (Dies-Alder, carbonylations, alkylations and polymerizations) can occur in an aqueous base. The only negative aspect is that metallic catalysts are not water soluble, although here too there is progress as catalysts can be joined to hydrophilic binders which stabilize their presence in the solution.

Reaction engineering has also enabled to control catalytic reactions through a technology combining reactor and catalyst. Therefore, if for example reaction temperatures wish to be adjusted within specific margins that are thermodynamically favourable to the desired reaction, fluidized bed catalysts can be used to improve flow distribution and heat transfer.

7.9 Separation Processes

Process changes must take into account any reaction improvements together with the separation processes. The separation, as selectively as possible, of products and byproducts, unwanted waste streams and materials that were not transformed in the reaction stage, have a considerable effect on processes eco-efficiency. Aside from producing products of the quality required, they facilitate direct recirculation or segregation of streams for recycling, recovery or treatment. An optimum reaction-separation combination should be carried out.

There are many CP measures that can be implemented, such as distillation, absorption, etc. and in the same way that the reaction is a typical stage of the chemical industry, separation processes have many applications in other industrial sectors. For example, solvent separation and recovery are as useful in the chemical industry as in surface treatments that use solvents for degreasing.

The search for more selective equipment and better automatic controls, multiple product separation sequences (figure 7.3), waste stream segregation, the markets for byproducts and external recycling are part of other options that are found in the improvement of chemical processes [107].

Figure 7.3 Alternatives of Separation after the Reaction A+B → P+S+(A)

7.10 Case Study: Batch Processes

Batch processes are more typical of SMEs because they are applied in many fine chemistry and pharmaceutical chemistry industries. The steps to follow in CP assessment of an existing batch-operated process are practically the same as the steps to follow when designing a new process [111], [112].

The adaptation of the Douglas proposal to a batch process is [20]:

7.11 Activities

Exercise 1

Confirm or deny the following sentences:

  • The chemical industry has given more environmental benefits than problems
  • Chemical reactions only progress in one direction
  • A high transformation of raw materials guarantees a high product cost effectiveness
  • A high selectivity is necessary to obtain good product cost effectiveness
  • Fine chemistry processes provide proportionally less waste stream
  • Combustion is a chemical oxidation reaction
  • A perfect combustion would not give any environmental problems
  • Selectivity has a lot to do with catalysts
  • In green chemistry high pressure and temperature reactions are preferential
  • Renewable energies bear no relation to green chemistry
  • Toxicity of the products and not of the auxiliary manufacturing materials is important in green chemistry

Exercise 2

Classify the stages of process synthesis proposed by Douglas:

  • Vapour recovery system
  • Heat exchange network
  • Considerations of the reactor and recirculation structure
  • Continuous process compared to batch process
  • Input/output system of the flow sheet
  • Liquid recovery system
  • Specification of separation systems

Exercise 3

Classify the assessment levels of batch processes

  • Heating
  • Reactor loading
  • Analysis of separation system
  • Reactor unloading
  • Analysis of input/output structure
  • Analysis of energy integration
  • Analysis of reactor-recirculation design
  • Reaction
  • Analysis of cleaning and programming

8 WATER SAVING IN CP PROJECTS

8.1 Objective

Until recently, water saving had not been given enough attention by manufacturers. In the industrialization process, water was considered a very low cost resource when compared with other raw materials. When it became obvious that it was a limited resource-this is more evident in the Mediterranean region- that manufacturing processes depend largely on water, and that the cost of quality water was increasing, measures for resource conservation and reuse were developed.

This chapter:

8.2 The Importance of Water in the Mediterranean

The shortage of fresh water in the Mediterranean region is a very important issue in industrial planning and a relevant factor to be considered when promoting and implementating a CP programme in Mediterranean countries.

Table 8.1 shows the relationship between uses and available resources [113]. This table points out very significant figures, aimed at understanding the relevance of proper water management at all levels. In some countries, the yearly consumption of water exceeds their renewable resources --such is the case of Libya, Egypt and Israel-- whereas other countries use very large percentages without reaching the extreme situation of the first mentioned. The deficits must be balanced with the use of non-renewable fossil waters or by implementing energy consuming technologies.

Water may foreseeably become a future source of conflict. Problems may arise, not only due to a quantitative deficit but also to how the quality of the water is affected, partly as a result of industrial waste, aside from other causes such as poor management of the water acquifers. Overall water management, including industrial management, requires the implementation of preventive measures.

Table 8.1 Water Resources and Balances in Mediterranean Countries
  Renewable natural water resources Water extractions (yearly) Production of desalted water (millions m3) 
Year Total (millions m3) Per capita (m3 per person) % of renewable water resources Sectoral distribution (%)
Total (km3) * Per Capita (m3 per person)
Agriculture Household Industry
WORLD           650   71 9 20 ..
Albania 42   13,178 1995 1,400 440 3 71 29 0 ..
Bosnia Herzegovina 38   9,088 1995 1,000 292 3 60 30 10 ..
Croatia 106   22,654 1996 764 164 1 0 50 50 ..
France 204   3,414 1999 32,300 547 16 10 18 72 ..
Greece 74   6,984 1997 8,700 826 12 87 10 3 ..
Italy 191   3,330 1998 42,000 730 22 48 19 34 ..
Slovenia 32   16,070 1996 1,280 642 4 1 20 80 ..
España 112   2,793 1997 35,210 884 32 68 13 19 ..
Algeria 14   460 1995 5,000 181 39 52 34 14 64
Egypt 58 h 830 1996 66,000 1,055 127 82 7 11 25
Israel 2   265 1997 1,620 287 108 54 39 7 ..
Lebanon 4 h 1,219.50 1996 1,300 400 33 68 27 6 0
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 1   108.5 1999 4,500 870 801 84 13 3 70
Morocco 29   936 1998 11,480 399 43 89 10 2 3.4
Syrian Arab Rep 26 h 1,541 1995 12,000 844 55 90 8 2 0
Tunisia 5   576.5 1996 2,830 312 54 86 13 1 8.3
Turkey 229 h 3,344 1997 35,500 558 17 73 16 12 0.5

h: data of flow rates guaranteed as per agreements or treaties with other countries

In the Mediterranean region, sustainable water management in the industry and its efficient use, is a task that requires particular consideration when diagnosing CP opportunities, including monographic actions directed exclusively at water. Indeed, some agents in the Mediterranean region involved in Cleaner Production, already consider water as a priority.

8.3 Water Management in Industrial Sectors

8.3.1 The Conceptual Change

Water must always be considered as a vital resource that plays a critical role for the achievement of sustainable development. Industrialized countries owe part of their progress to the availability of good water resources; however, it has also become an increasingly scarce resource due in these countries to lack of rational management.

Although water should have been considered as any other raw material or solvent used in industries, the following historical reasons hindered this viewpoint.

  • In the first countries to become industrialized, water was a cheap resource that did not have much incidence on the economic balance of manufacture.
  • At the beginning of industrial development, industrial wastewaters had little specific incidence on the receiving medium.
  • Research and development laboratories were among the last to recognize the global importance of water.

It was finally pointed out that there were major reasons to promote an efficient water management system in industrial sectors, which include:

  • the increasingly restricted availability of this resources,
  • the need to obtain quality regulatory limits for wastewater discharge,
  • the increasing cost of total water management.

8.3.2 Principles of Water Management

Recognising the problem, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (CEPE)[114] formulated, and is continually ratifying, the universal principles for water cycle management in production systems, calling all countries to review their principles for usage and disposal. The way they have been formulated, these principles are totally validated in CP:

  1. Water must be considered as a resource to be conserved.
  2. Water must be discharged with physical-chemical and biological characteristics that do not have a detrimental impact on the environment, or that can preferably be reused.
  3. The critical components of water must continually be monitored and the results recorded in order to keep the situation under control.
  4. Direct liability for water management must be assigned to the head of each production department.
  5. Optimum operating conditions must be established for each separate use, and the type of water to be used in all the process installations must be determined.

The way to better water management did not begin with an analysis of the problems at the source. When the industry was forced to remedy the pollution problems it originated, the practice adopted initially was the end-of-pipe wastewater treatment. This practice was initially supported by environmental policies that favoured end-of-pipe treatments rather than stimulating reuse. Otherwise regulations could even hinder initiatives to implement water saving measures. This is the case when concentrations of the discharges are applied to the industry but not to the total amounts of pollutant discharged.

This disincentivates water saving as it could lead to the concentration limits being exceeded (when not acting against saving because some industries use additional fresh water to dilute their wastewaters to the concentration required).

8.3.3 Assessment of Water Management in CP

The assessment of water management can be done separately or isolatedly, as part of a simple assessment or of a comprehensive CP programme, or as part of the implementation of an EMS.

To carry out an assessment of the water management (use and generation of wastewaters) and of possible changes, involves:

  • Reviewing the legislation and regulations, including any that may limit the possibilities of reuse.
  • Obtaining/reviewing the data on water supply, its source and volumes.
  • Obtaining/reviewing the data on wastewaters: flow rates and volumes treated, averages and maximum specific volumes, intermediate storage, locating effluent discharge.
  • Determining the characteristics of the streams: pH, temperature, TDS, BOD, COD, etc.
  • Carrying out water balances.
  • Assessing loss from infiltration or vaporization.
  • Obtaining economic data on the cost of treatments and supplies.
  • Identifying potential quantities for recycling and reuse.
  • Identifying and performing a technical assessment of process modifications and operational changes required to improve the system.
  • Assessing new equipment and additional material requirements.
  • Assessing intermediate storage requirements to balance fluctuations between availability and demand.
  • Assessing new environmental impacts that may arise as a result of the changes.
  • Carrying out an economic analysis comparing present and future costs.

8.4 Industrial Use of Water

Water is used industrially for many different applications that vary with regards to both the quantity and the quality required for the processes. Depending on the application, the volumes used go from a few litres to many cubic metres per hour: [115], [116]

Used in large volumes

  • Cooling systems:
    • By direct contact (used in showers)
    • In open loops with direct collection and water return (used in heat exchangers and condensers)
    • In closed loops through cooling towers (used in heat exchangers and condensers)

Uses in moderate volumes

  • General services at the factory for:
    • Cleaning of equipment or components
    • Connections for cleaning and general maintenance
    • Sampling points that require cooling or condensation
    • Hydraulic seals
  • Uses in the process for:
    • General use in the processs as a reagent or solvent
    • As a transport means for solids
    • In gas scrubbing
  • Sanitary service

Uses in lesser volumes

  • High quality water make-up for:
    • boiler feed water
    • use in laboratories
    • selective use in the process

Potable service

  • Fire fighting water system (on standby)

The quality required varies largely according to use. Very few applications require a very high water quality. Applications often use water of higher quality than is strictly required. The different quality requirements offer the possibility of carrying out water recovery and cascade uses by progressively using the partially contaminated water for applications with lower requirements, although it is usually necessary to implement a partial treatment technology before reuse. Only waters that cannot be recycled should be sent to the sewer after being treatment, if they do not meet the quality standards for discharge.

8.5 Types of Wastewater

Wastewaters generated in the processes can be classified according to their origin and quality. The quality is particularly linked to the use it has been given. It is often advisable to segregate wastewaters in order to give them a more efficient treatment or a specific destination. Concentrated waters can make contaminant recovery economically viable. This may be the case with chromium from tanning wastewaters or heavy metals from surface treatment systems. Some of the segregated waters are also easier to treat for reuse rather than having to purify them further for their discharge to the receiving medium in appropriate conditions.

A plant can start segregating their waters according to their origin:

  1. Waters from manufacturing and process units
    • Waters which have been used in the main reactions and transformations
    • Product cleaning waters
    • Water from recipient cleaning and rinsing
  2. Water from utilities services and support operations
    • Boiler blowdown
    • Cooling tower blowdown
    • Gas scrubbing blowdown
    • Water from ejectors and vacuum pumps
    • Treated wastewaters
    • General housekeeping water
  3. Stonewater
    • Contaminated
    • Non contaminated.

8.6 Reduction of Industrial Consumptions

The three main forms of reducing the volume of water used are:

Water use does not always correspond to real requirements There are many water conservation options in manufacturing plants, that can be identified and evaluated, starting with measurements without having to resort to experts, although undoubtedly the contribution of an expert may increase the possibilities of conservation.

For example, this is the case of systems with free water circulation without a regulating system in which the flow rates adapt to the pressure and piping size. A typical case is that of cleaning operations when a hose without a pistol is used. By regulating the pressure and using water jets the effectiveness of the cleaning process also increases. When cleaning tanks or irregular shaped parts, the jet head must be adapted to the shape of the part to be cleaned, and an appropriate jet chosen, such as a conical or elongated one for example. By using adequate cleaning systems, water savings can amount to 15 - 60% [117].

The adoption of a CIP system, described inMedClean file no. 49, "Improvements in the cleaning system: the CIP system", enables a reduction in water consumption and, in the case described of a company in the food industry, also in the pollutant load washed out by the cleaning water.

Cooling systems, that use a lot of water, often circulate too much water and do not take advantage of the capacity of the exchanger or the available increase of cooling water temperature, which translates in an inefficient use of the cooling tower.

Measuring is essential to find out the consumptions and draw up balances for all sorts of materials and energy. This is also the case with water. In any factory, there is a relationship between production and water use. To reduce or eliminate losses (or unnecessary use), consumptions need to be measured and compared with real requirements. Often, it is not sufficient to know what the average consumptions are, it will also be necessary to know the peak consumption values or the weekly or seasonal distribution. Losses in buried piping systems or systems that are difficult to access, can be assessed using the right measures. Comparing measurings between operating and shutdown periods is usually very indicative.

Following are a few examples of water conservation options in processes and in utility services:

8.7 Water Reuse

The alternatives for reuse that can be given to wastewaters depend on their characteristics, the quality of the water required, and on technical and economical assessment criteria. Therefore, information must be obtained regarding:

Providing a too drastic change in quality is not sought, important water savings can be obtained with reuse measures. Wastewaters of complex contamination should not be treated to a high level of quality. When waters from different sources are mixed together, the compatibility of the substances contained in the water must be checked.

Water consumption is very important in some industries, such as sugar. For this reason reuse actions, such as those carried out in a Moroccan factory in the sector, described inMedClean file no. 9, achieve reductions in water consumption of 60%.

The formation of scale, corrosion and deposits due to microbiological growth are common problems that arise from the use of reused water, which will require controlling. Other problems are specific to each industrial sector. For example, in the manufacture of paper, its colour may be affected by the presence of iron or manganese.

8.8 Recovery Technologies

Many recovery technologies are the same as the technologies used in typical wastewater treatments (table 8.2). Large flow rate treatment processes such as sedimentation, softening or biological treatment, have relatively low purifying costs per cubic metre of treated water. Other processes are more selective and for specific applications, with higher unitary costs that depend on the degree of purity sought [116], [117], [118].

An example of water recovery after passing through an evaporator is described in MedClean file no. 28, in a Spanish mechanical parts firm.

Table 8.2 Technologies Applicable in Contaminated Water Treatment
Technology Soluble inorganic contaminants Soluble organic contaminants Suspended contaminants Biological contaminants
Stripping with steam, air, etc.
Ion exchange
Active carbon
Centrifugation
Crystallisation
Electro-dialysis
Evaporation, distillation
Solvent extraction
Filtration
Flotation
Biological oxidation
Chemical oxidation
Precipitation
Sedimentation (coagulation, flocculation)
Membrane separation (osmosis, ultra-filtration)

8.9 Membrane Technology

Among the different technologies developed for water recycling and reuse, membrane technology is particularly important. Membrane filtration allows to separate the components through polymer membranes giving a permeate and a concentrate. The permeate is the fraction that passes through the semi-permeable membrane. The concentrate, that follows the tangential flow on the membrane, entrains, with part of the fluid, the components that cannot go through the membrane.

The degree of concentration is associated with the distribution of pollutants between purified water and concentrated water (a 4x factor, for example, corresponds to a 75/25 permeate/concentrate distribution relation). The effectiveness of the separation depends on the size and other factors relating to the molecule.

The goal is to obtain a volume of concentrate as small as possible, preventing any of the components of the solution from reaching a point of insolubility or precipitation. In a typical water, the limiting factor can be calcium carbonate that precipitates at 500-1,000 ppm after adjusting the pH (in some conditions, pH is adjusted to an acid value to convert calcium carbonate into the more soluble bicarbonate), calcium sulphate that precipitates at 2, 00 ppm, or silica that precipitates at around 120 ppm.

According to the membrane pore size, the separation goes from the ionic range for small molecules (reverse osmosis; MW <150) to the macromolecular range (ultrafiltration; MW >1,000) with intermediate situations (nanofiltration; MW 300-1,000). Above the ultrafiltration size, the process is defined as a microfiltration. The molecular weight range is approximate because other factors are also involved, such as the shape of the molecule.

8.10 Case Study: Surface Treatments

Understanding the advantages of CP requires bringing students into contact with real situations and presenting evidence that is interesting enough to reinforce their interest. Many sectorial publications are aimed at covering these aspects. One of the CP/RAC publications studies the surface treatment industry [119]. Likewise, MedClean file no. 2, "Cleaner production in a company in the electroplating bath sector through adopting Good Housekeeping Practices (GHPs) and process changes", describes a selection of measures applied and the results obtained.

The metal surface coating industry generates very complex and toxic wastewaters, with heavy metal ions, cyanides and solvent residues, which require physicochemical treatments. In this sector, some of the best CP opportunities are precisely of water saving during the rinsing of parts after coating.

After each coating stage, rinsing is required to eliminate the excess metal carried over from the baths, making it necessary to use large quantities of water that are proportional to the production [119], [120], [121]. This is one of the processes that offers the best opportunity for water saving and an excellent example of the advantages of counter-current rinsing, as compared with single rinsing and parallel rinsing.

8.10.1 Single and Multiple Rinsing Without Addition of Fresh Water

Single rinsing is carried out in a tank after the coating process without any other water than that originally contained in the tank. No fresh water is added during the rinses and it is assumed that the mixture in the tank is perfect. If the initial concentration (in contaminant) of the rinse water is zero, then the concentration in the rinsing tank after n immersions is

where

v = volume carried over in each immersion (litres)

V = volume of rinsing tank

C0 = initial concentration of contaminant solution carried over from the coating

Cn = concentration in the rinsing tank after n immersions (mg/litre)

8.10.2 Rinsing in a Single Tank with Addition of a Constant Fresh Water Flow Rate (Q)

q = v·n/t·Q

where

n =number of carry overs in a time t

Q = Constant flow rate of fresh water added to the tank and discharged by overflowing

After a certain time a stabilized concentration is reached

8.10.3 Rinsing In n Series Tanks, each with Parallel Addition of an Equal Fresh Water Flow Rate (Q)

Concentration at the outlet of tank n is

The fresh water flow fed into each tank to obtain a specific concentration of contaminant Cn is

When q<<Q approx. the usual form is obtained

And the total flow rate of fresh water consumed is

8.10.4 Counter-current Rinsing with a Single Supply of Fresh Water Flow (Q)

Concentration of contaminant in tank n, and in the carry over after going through n series tanks is

Flow rate Q required when q<<Q is

8.11 Activities

Exercise 1

State if the following sentences are right or wrong:

  • Water is too cheap to be included in a CP assessment programme
  • In every process that uses water, this substance has an economic weight
  • Water is only a problem in developing or very dry countries
  • It is not necessary to have anyone in particular responsible for water use
  • Water is a solvent with limitations
  • Industrial water use can be very seasonal although not as much as city water usage
  • It is always interesting to reuse as much water as possible
  • The level of reuse only depends on the sources of wastewaters

Exercise 2

  1. The first activity proposed is to reach the equations for the four types of rinsing systems presented: (8.10.1 to 8.10.4)

    The solution to this exercise is available.

    1. Single and Multiple Rinsing without Addition of Fresh Water

      There is a single rinse without addition of fresh water and it is assumed that the mixture in the tank is perfect. If the initial contaminant concentration of the rinse water is zero, and

      v = volume carried over in each immersion (litres)

      V = volume in rinse tank

      C0 = initial concentration of the contaminant solution carried over from the coating bath (mg/litre)

      Cn = concentration in the rinse tank after n immersions (mg/litre)

      The balance of contaminant for the 1st rinsing operation is

      and the contaminant concentration is

      The balance for the 2nd rinsing operation is

      and the contaminant concentration is

      Then, concentration in the rinse tank after n immersions is

    2. Rinse in a Single Tank with Addition of a Constant Fresh Water Flow Rate

      The carry over for each immersion (v) is assimilated to a constant flow rate q,

      q = v.n/t. Q

      where n = number of carry overs in a time tQ =constant fresh water flow rate added to the tank and discharged by overflowing

      In transitory regime, concentration after a time t is

      After some time a stabilized concentration is obtained

    3. Series Rinsing in n Tanks, each with the Addition of a Constant Fresh Water Flow Rate Q

      In stationary state, concentration at the:

      • Outlet of the 1st tank (previous problem)

      • Outlet of 2nd tank

      • Lastly, concentration at the outlet of tank n is

      The fresh water flow rate fed to each tank to achieve a specific concentration of contaminant Cn is

      when q<<Q, approx. the regular form is obtained

      Overall fresh water flow rate used, is

    4. Counter-current Rinse with a Single Supply of Fresh Water Flow Rate Q

      In the case of 2 stationary tanks(C3= 0):

      Balance in 1st tank

      Balance in 2nd tank

      By substituting and operating, the following is reached:

      The contaminant concentration in tank n, and in the carry overs after going through n series tanks, is

      Flow rate Q required when q<<Q is

  2. The second activity is to determine the water use and average concentrations of effluents corresponding to the cases mentioned, when a stationary operation is reached and carry over from the process tank is 1 litre/minute at a concentration of 100,000 mg/litre:

    Types of rinse Water use (litres/minute) Average effluent concentration (mg/l)
    Single
    2-stage parallel
    3-stage parallel
    4-stage parallel
    2-stage counter-current
    3-stage counter-current
    4-stage counter-current

The solution of this exercise is available

Example of a Solution for 2-Stage Parallel Rinsing

The balance is started at the outlet of the last (2nd) tank

Q = 99 l/min and tank

Total water use = n. Q = 2.99 = 198 l/min

Outlet from 1st tank

Average effluent concentration = (99x1000 + 99x10)/198 = 505 mg/l

Table of Solutions

Types of rinse Water use (litres/minute) Average effluent concentration (mg/l)
Single 9.999 10
2-stage parallel 198 505
3-stage parallel 62 1.622
4-stage parallel 36 2.777
2-stage counter-current 100 1000
3-stage counter-current 22 4.641
4-stage counter-current 10 9.999

9 ENERGY SAVING AND CP

9.1 Objective

Industrial plants use several forms of energy (electricity, steam...) as well as different equipments. The interest in energy saving became a priority due to economic reasons following the energy crisis in 1973, long before CP was organized. In fact, some years later the energy experience helped to rapidly develop a CP methodology. Although the concern for energy saving declined, it has been renewed with CP programmes due to its relevance in climate change.

This chapter includes:

9.2 Energy Eco-efficiency

In the mid seventies, the price of energy increased a lot more than the price of industrial materials and equipment. This justified many investments in energy-efficient equipment. In the new economic framework, a movement began for the conservation of energy and the introduction of improvements in energy efficiency. Later, the relative price of energy declined again, along with the interest for improving energy management.

The sectors that benefited most from the efficiency improvements were large consumers, namely the oil, chemical, primary metal, pulp and paper, building materials and glass industries. In absolute terms, these are still the sectors that show most interest. However, relative benefit are equally interesting for any industrial activity in which energy is an important part of the manufacturing cost.

Some Mediterranean countries are large producers of fossil energy and obtain a major part of their income in the trade balance from fuel exportations. This fact should not lead them to boost a domestic industry based on low cost fuel, because a disincentivation of energy efficiency can end up outdoing any theoretic benefits by causing a cascade effect on the whole industrial fabric. In any case, eco-efficiency should not be discouraged, it should be promoted as a component of industrial culture of any country.

CP has always considered energy as one more element of eco-efficiency in transformation. And, the probability of a climate change, principally linked to carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels, has renewed the interest in energy efficiency and conservation and the implementation of renewable energies. The positive effect of renewable energies on climate change is reinforced indirectly by a reduction of CFCs, which is closely linked to energy consuming equipment.

The increase in renewable energies is critical for limiting the greenhouse effect. Mediterranean countries have a huge potential in solar energy that will have to be taken into account in the future, while they could be affected negatively by a possible climate change.

However, with the low price of fossil fuels, it cannot be expected, for competitive reasons, that industry owners assume the shift to renewable energies on their own, except in some particular circumstances. This shift is only possible in the short term in a strategy that includes instruments of economic support for the implementation of renewable energies.

Chlorofluorocarbon products (CFCs)are used as a basic circulating material in the thermodynamic cycle of many low temperature air-conditioning units, refrigerators, heat pumps, etc.

9.3 Energy Systems

An energy system consists of various sub-systems that can be studied and optimized separately, although they will eventually be assessed jointly. The heterogeneity of the energy system starts with the different forms of energy present (kinetic, potential, chemical, etc.), but the most commonly used in all industries are heat and electric energy. Heat energy is applied in many different ways: as hot water, pressurized steam and thermal oil; it is also associated with the transformation process of some materials such as sensible heat from melted metal or vaporization heat in the steam phase of a distillation tower.

In an energy system, there are [122] (figure 9.1):

  1. Different forms of energy inputs (fuel, electricity, steam, renewable, etc.)
  2. Internal conversions from one form of energy to another
  3. The distribution systems that take the energy to the consumption points
  4. Utilisation points and their different destination uses
  5. Energy recovery systems
  6. Energy outputs or losses

Figure 9.1 Main Subsystems of the Energy System

9.4 The Energy Audit

Over time, the price of energy is subject to changing trends that are quite different from the price variations of raw materials. Therefore, an energy system that is designed optimally for certain conditions may not adapt well to others. Technologies also improve, seeking higher efficiencies. The energy audit (incorrectly called an audit as it is more like a diagnosis or assessment of the energy system) can be conducted as an isolated exercise, although it is preferable if it is part of a permanent energy management programme, a CP programme, or an element of a well-implemented EMS. These are all good occasions to adapt to the changing circumstances .

The methodology for energy programme auditing [122], [123], [124] is similar to carrying out a CP diagnosis or assessment (section 5). It requires complete support from the management, assigning of responsibility to a real promoter and the participation of all the parts interested, including the system operators. The audit team can start by verifying if there are any previous studies carried out on the energy system. The first step for an assessment will be to obtain relevant information regarding the system, which will allow to set goals and establish progress indicators.

The following information must be obtained, as it is among the most important:

  • Different forms of energy uses (gas, electricity, steam, etc.), and their annual, weekly, seasonal evolution, in absolute values and values per production unit
  • Consumption peaks, their cause and whether they are inevitable
  • Prices and rates of the energy sources
  • Distribution of the energy to the different consumption points
  • Environmental problems generated by each type of consumption
  • Technical capacity of personnel
  • Information on energy-saving and conservation options, obtained directly from experts or through comparable experiences
  • Economic assessment criteria.

The physical system audit is then planned and conducted in various phases. Document studies must be accompanied by on-site visits and checks that will help the energy experts to identify possible discrepancies between the actual situation and the printed information, as well as to identify other opportunities based on a series of practical rules which any expert has assimilated over time. This phase includes:

At present, many firms have carried out some sort of energy-saving exercise when the energy cost is a relevant part of the overall production cost. However, permanent economic and technological change factors still allow the identification of new opportunities. For enterprises that have not granted special attention to the energy issue, the success level is usually equivalent to other CP aspects.

9.5 Options to Reduce Energy Consumption

There are many different options to improve energy management in each energy subsystem [125], [129].

Some options focus on making the design of process equipments more efficient and reducing their energy requirements (in the distillation for example). Other options use auxiliary systems that allow recovery of the energy that would otherwise be discharged in the environment (economizers, thermo-compression), or manage to extract energy from the environment with a supplementary contribution (heat pumps).

Management improvement is often achieved by paying attention to the overall heat system (transfer networks), or through an optimum combination of the different forms of energy (electricity and heat in cogeneration systems) for manufacture requirements. Another option is to consider and study jointly the requirements of plants located in the same area.

The following subsystems offer some of the best options:

9.6 Case Study: the Brewing Industry

9.6.1 Manufacturing Process

Brewing (figure 9.2) is based on an old fermentation process. In the past, brewing involved using large amounts of water and energy (table 9.1). With the new techniques available, consumption per production unit can be considerably reduced. Many modern installations are already including these advances, and they are also used as upgrading options for existing facilities [130]. In the process, there are several instances in which CP energy-saving measures can be implemented.

Malt is the basic raw material in a brewery. However, malting is generally considered an industry in itself. To manufacture malt, barley is dampened and left to germinate. Then it is dried with hot air and the germs are separated. To dry, air is blown during 40 hours at a temperature of 60ºC to 85ºC. During this stage, the humidity drops from 45% to 4% in order to maintain the grain in condition and facilitate transport. Drying is a process that uses large amounts of energy.

Then the malt is ready for brewing, and although a general method is followed, it varies from one factory to another. First the malt is ground and cooked with water to produce the beer wort. Then the wort is filtered to separate the insoluble matter and it is roasted by adding hops, that lends it its typical bitterness. During roasting, 6-12% of the wort evaporates. If the vapour is not recovered, there will be a loss of energy and foul odours. The simplest form to recover the vapour is to use it in other applications and for cleaning. However, it can also be reused in the same operation after going through a recompression stage that will increase its temperature. The solid waste pulp separated during the filtration, can be given as fresh feed to cattle that are nearby the facilities, or it can be pressed and dried.

The boiled wort is cooled and clarified before yeast is added for fermenting. The new yeast formed in excess must be separated and stabilised to be recovered as feed. After the first fermentation, the wort is submitted to centrifugation and cooled at a controlled temperature for storage. These cooling operations are an important part of the cooling requirements of the brewing industry.

For shipping, before bottling, the beer is filtered to clarify it, additives are added and it is carbonated with CO2, recovered from the fermentations. Much of the beer is bottled, although some of it is put in barrels. In order to ensure its stability, the beer that is in storage is sent through a sterile filtering or pasteurisation process.

Figure 9.2 Diagram of Brewing

Table 9.1 Typical Inputs and Outputs to Obtain 1 hl. of Beer
Inefficient Efficient
Input Malt and other 18 15
Energy MJ 350 150
Electricity kWh 20 8-12
Water hl 20 5
Output By-products
Grains used 17 14
Yeast 3 3
Wastewaters
Volume hl 18,5 3,5
BOD 1,2 0,8

9.6.2 Environmental Impacts of Brewing

The environmental impacts of brewing include:

  • consumption of large amounts of water,
  • large consumption of energy for heating,
  • large consumption of energy for cooling,
  • high discharge of organic matter,
  • much solid waste,
  • cleaning systems,
  • as well as dust, noise, ammonia, glass, filtering material (kieselguhr), etc.

Beer is manufactured in a similar way on all the continents and has been the subject of many CP assessments, covering all its manufacturing aspects, such as energy among others [130], [131], [132], [133], [134].

9.6.3 Energy Applications

The use of energy in the manufacture of beer is high, although the present technologies offer several options of improving the energy yield. In an energy assessment, the implementation of three specific techniques of energy conservation can be considered, beyond a simple heat exchanger:

  1. Co-generation systems are very effective when a large supply of heat is required and the electric energy from the system can also be sold.
  2. The heat pump has many application options within a specific temperature range. It extracts heat from a cold source: air or water at room temperature and delivers it at 55-80ºC using an appropriate carrier fluid in an inverse Rankine or Carnot cycle.
  3. Another alternative is the mechanic compression of water steam when this fluid can be recovered with its energy content.

In every case, the process economy varies depending on the relative prices of gas or fuel and of electricity. In the malt production stage, the kiln drying process consumes large amounts of energy. One possibility would be to use the hot gas from a cogeneration system for drying. This solution has applications with a payback period of 2-3 years [135].

Exist two alternative options for drying malt with energy recovery. One of them with a simple heat recovery using an exchanger (figure 9.3), in which the additional heat required to complete the drying is obtained from the auxiliary boiler.

Figure 9.3 Malt Drying Installation

The other option would be the use of a heat pump (figure 9.4) to increase thermal efficiency. This device allows a reduction in the energy consumption specific to the drying process of 705 kWh, in a traditional installation with a gas boiler, by up to 213 kWh per tonne of malt [136].

Figure 9.4 Malt Drying Installation Using a Heat Pump

The same heat pump cycle can be applied to the cooling circuit [137]. In this case, energy is extracted at low temperature and released at room temperature. The cooling requirements are around 35 MJ per Hl. of beer.

Roasting is another operation that uses a large amount of energy. There are two alternatives for heat recovery: roasting with single exchanger with intermediate storage (figure 9.5), and using an ejector or mechanical steam compression system (figure 9.6) [130], [138]. The typical heating solution requires consuming 737 kWh per tonne of steam, whereas mechanical compression reduces consumption to 52 kWh [138].

Figure 9.5 Heat Recovery through Preheating

Figure 9.6 Heat Recovery through Mechanic Steam Compression

The pinch technique has also been applied to the brewing industry, to integrate all the heating and cooling loads [139].

9.7 Activities

Exercise 1

Answer if the following sentences are correct or not:

  • Energy is a separate subject to CP
  • Energy audits are prior to CP
  • Energy audits cannot be carried out separately from CP
  • The different forms of industrial energy can be converted into the same units of measure (eg, heat and electricity in kWh)
  • In all plants the energy is always consumed in the same form as it is supplied
  • Energy can be recovered 100%
  • Losses can also occur in the distribution
  • The energy balance in its stationary form is sufficient to identify the efficiency of all the systems
  • Energy efficiency also has to do with the temperature at which the energy is available
  • Heat pumps are used to transfer hot liquids between two recipients
  • Cogeneration combines a heat source and an electricity source

Exercise 2

Application: Water and Energy Saving in an Industrial Washing Machine

The following is an exercise proposed as a practical example in which there is possibility of water and energy saving. It is the case of a firm specializing in industrial laundry that washes around 500 tons of laundry yearly, divided in 200 working days. The washing process used, that is technically similar to the system used in a household washing machine, is particularly polluting. The water used for each separate operation of the washing process is used once and discharged to the sewer system. Initially, there is no energy recovered.

The operation is very inefficient from a viewpoint of consumption of resources. And, the trend is to increase the price of water and a consumption tax has been established. There is also a requirement for treating water before its discharge.

The washing programme is sequential and includes the following process cycles and conditions:

Soaking 40 ºC soft water 8 litres water/kg of laundry
Prewash 40 ºC soft water 8 litres water/kg of laundry
Washing 80 ºC soft water 5 litres water/kg of laundry
1. Rinsing 40 ºC soft water 6 litres water/kg of laundry
2. Rinsing cold soft water 6 litres water/kg of laundry
3. Rinsing cold soft water 6 litres water/kg of laundry
4. Rinsing cold soft water 6 litres water/kg of laundry
5. Rinsing cold hard water 6 litres water/kg of laundry

Except for the last rinse, the water used is soft water, to guarantee the quality of the process.

The relation between litres of water and kilograms of laundry indicated is the amount in litres of water that there must be in the machine (partly soaked up by the clothes and partly free) per kilo of laundry. It can be calculated that the laundry soak up 2.5 litres of water/kg of laundry are after the machine is emptied. Spinning will help to drain off one more litre of water per kilo of laundry.

In the prewash and the wash, a detergent is used that is part soap part bleach. The soap has the following composition:

fatty acid 40 %
non-ionic surfactants 5 %
alkylbenzene sulphonic acid 5 %
isopropylic alcohol 10 %
optical brightener 0,1 %
water up to 100 %

The bleach is a 30% weight sodium hypochlorite solution

In the rinsing, the bleaching agent used is a sodium hypochlorite solution with a 12.5% weight of active chlorine, and the neutralizer is a 40% weight acetic acid solution.

The following amounts are added:

Prewash 15 g soap/dry laundry
15 g bleach/dry laundry
Wash 20 g soap/kg of dry laundry
15 g bleach/kg of dry laundry
First rinse 2 g chlorine/kg of dry laundry
Fifth rinse 2 g acetic acid/kg of dry laundry

The prewash water that is discharged has a pH of 9.5, and the washing water a pH of 10,5.

The energy used for heating the water is obtained from overheated steam at 120 ºC.

Suggest approaches for water and energy saving (independently, the added cleaning agents should be adapted).

The solution of this exercise is available

Possible Solutions to be Implemented in an Industrial Washing Machine

10 PROGRESS AND FUTURE OF CP

10.1 Objective

Some of the applications of CP show results that are immediate or visible in the short term. Other options could possibly be applied in the future when the environmental costs are internalised, financial criteria are applied that are more sensitive to sustainable development, or technologies are improved. In order to stimulate new applications it is important to keep a record of the progress achieved with the implementation of CP measures. However, aside from being a means of introducing environmental management in industrial enterprises, it also prepares them for innovative options and future competitiveness. To achieve sustainable development, a transition period will be required during which the necessary changes are carried out. These changes must be capable of originating sufficient technological development to attain the efficiency factor X that is considered necessary in the use of resources.

This chapter describes:

10.2 The Measure of Progress

There are many proposals concerning how to measure the environmental progress achieved with CP, as an index or as indicators. It is always preferable to use a quantitative form. At the same time, it is also advisable, whenever possible, to measure the actual economic benefits of CP. The group of measures can then be compared to the forecasts made in the preliminary assessments and judge whether the forecasts made were realistic. The measures of progress should become part of the integrated business management indicators [140].

The results can be expressed in absolute values or relative indexes. As absolute values they can take on a series of values measured on a yearly basis and the comparison between values that are consecutive in time can then be used to determine the measure of progress. Alternatively, standardised indexes can be used that give the measure of progress by themselves.

Following are some examples of absolute measures used as indicators:

  • Consumption of raw material per product unit
  • Annual consumption of energy in its various forms
  • Annual water consumption
  • Annual generation of waste streams
  • Annual generation of wastewater, in volume or polluting load
  • Annual generation of byproducts
  • Annual consumption of toxic substances
  • Annual generation of total and/or toxic waste, etc.

The indicators based on standardized indexes according to a production unit, are not only used for internal comparisons but they are also frequently used to compare different production facilities manufacturing the same products, and can be compared with the theoretic values or best values achieved in practice (benchmarking).

The reduction index, RI, is calculated according to the following equation

where:

Gb = quantity processed or generated in the base year

Gn = quantity processed or generated in the current reporting year

Pb = product produced in the base year

Pn = product produced in the current reporting year

The Pn/Pb relation is also the activity index on the production facility

Other indexes of specific internal use can also be used, such as:

10.3 CP as an Innovative Process

During the 20th century, the prosperity of the industrial society was partly due to an intensive scientific and technological research process, which was followed by the innovative process. Basic scientific research (the generation of new knowledge) and applied scientific research (the solving of specific technical problems) are the basis for building a cumulative, organized and systematic body of knowledge. This knowledge opens the door to new findings (discovering something that already existed but was unknown to us) and inventions (inventing something that did not exist). The technological innovation process is fuelled by these findings and discoveries and develops activities that enable them to be put into practice. In order to judge CP as precursory of innovation in enterprises, need it only be highlighted that CP is also "fuelled by findings and discoveries and develops activities that allow to put them into practice".

Innovation is the result of an innovative process, defined as a combination of activities that enable the introduction of new products, processes and services on the market. Some of these innovations are completely technology-based (such as personal computers), whereas others are provided by the new technology (the electronic data processing for managing a medical department, for example).

Innovation is a necessary complement for the successful introduction of technological novelty in the society. Some innovations can be considered as simply incremental, whereas others are radical. Companies that opt for CP tend to be vocationally innovative and adopt CP as an additional business element of technological progress, or even as an initiator to put their vocation into practice.

Incremental innovations involve adapting, improving or refining an existing product, process or service. CP is included in the incremental innovations, either as a user or a motivator of innovation.

Radical innovations involve completely new types of products, processes or services. Although it is difficult to determine the form and measure in which CP will contribute to radical innovations, it is however possible to perceive that the firms that have implemented CP in their production processes will be more prepared for this new stage.

The Mediterranean countries have unequal capacities, in the short term, of participating in the development of radical innovations, but when it comes to incremental innovations their competency is almost the same, particularly when many of the incremental innovations involve adapting technologies to the specific conditions of each country. CP contributes to development and benefits from local experiences that take into account the differentiating facts such as the availability of material resources and qualified labour, environmental conditions, etc.

10.4 The Transition to a Sustainable Development

When the advances achieved with CP are described with satisfaction, the present situation must be put into perspective. The transition from the current society to a society focusing on sustainable development requires changes that are much more significant than the incremental changes provided by CP, or any other tools focusing on producing short term improvements. During the coming decades, incremental improvements will not be sufficient to ensure an economic growth that has to be combined with environmental and social improvements.

The changes required to achieve a sustainable society are of a different scale and will need to be included in a transition process [141], [142], [143]. The possibility of optimizing this process of transition towards a sustainable development will depend largely on the availability of appropriate technologies, as well as on an innovative strategy and conditions that must necessarily focus on sustainability at all levels (international, local, governmental, scientific and social). The necessary transformations in the industrial field will affect most sectors (table 10.1) [142]. Therefore, to stay on this innovative course (table 10.2) it will be particularly useful if the companies have previously acquired a certain capacity for changing, through implementing CP.

This process of transition involves many factors and as many actors. Its success will require the creation of transition prospects shared between parties of different characteristics. Therefore, a transition management system with a view of the future will be necessary as well as an efficient communication system between the parties. The following example (figure 10.1) of a transition system to create an energy supply system that does not increase atmospheric CO2 will require implementing various technologies. However, for the productive actors to consider them as commercial opportunities, some decisive institutional actions will also be necessary such as, subsidies, fiscal measures, regulations, etc.) [144].

Figure 10.1 The Transition from a Fossil to a Neutral Fuel Supply

Table 10.1 Examples of the Transformation of the Industrial System [142]
Main raw materials Energy Target function Structure/ Organization
Present Oil Minerals Fossil fuels:
  • Oil
  • Natural gas
  • Coal
Production of all kinds of goods
  • Centralized
  • Large facilities
Future Plants:
  • Cereals
  • Oleaginous
  • Cellulose
Solar:
  • Biomass
  • Photovoltaic
  • Solar panels
  • Hydraulic
Production of long lasting goods:
  • Repair
  • Recycling
  • Valuation
  • Regional/
  • De-centralized
  • Small facilities

Figura 10.2 Transición desde el origen de la P+L a la innovación

In the Mediterranean countries where CP plays an important role in incremental innovation, its cooperation with the national or university centres for applied technology, contributing with the on site experience achieved in the industry, should act as a stimulating element to help these research centres increase their possibilities of success in participating in radical innovation.

10.5 The Social Dimension of Technological Change

The first efforts to improve the environment were aimed at applying end-of-pipe cleaning technologies instead of applying cleaner technologies. To correct this trend, a movement sprung up in the seventies under the concept of appropriate technology, called "technology adapted to the psychosocial and biophysical context prevailing in a particular location and period" [141]. This movement proved to be a failure, as it did not take into account the social dimension of the technological change, required to have a crucial influence on the redesigning of the technological systems. The reluctance of many engineers to apply alternative design technologies is partly explained by the technological paradigms.

This concept was introduced by Thomas Kuhn, who postulated in 1962 that science progresses in periods of ordinary science, which operates within a scientific paradigm, interrupted by periods of scientific revolution. The ordinary, traditional or routine technology of engineers and technologists is simply an extension or an incremental development of the existing technology, subscribed by those who share a common education and work experience.

In circumstances of ordinary technology, the development or technological path is determined by the existing paradigm (figure 10.2). Radical technological innovation often comes up against many companies due to the social changes that may be required (changes in operators' work and skill, the way production is organized, relations with customers and suppliers, etc.). Since decisions must be adopted in situations of conflicting interests, the regulatory and economic instruments applied are rarely strong enough to lead to a technological change of the required magnitude to approach sustainability. However, the very concept of sustainability incorporates the need to harmonise development, environment and social respect.

Figure 10.2 The Technological Path Determined by the Existing Paradigm [141]

10.6 Transition Management

It is difficult to make a strict definition of the framework in which to progress towards transition, but some countries have started a period to assess and analyse the trends and results of actions focusing on sustainable development [143], [144]. As a result, transition management principles can be offered to mark the beginning of the path to a new period of technological innovation:

10.7 Change Factor X

A change of the scale described in this chapter can be measured according to a factor X (4,10, or other) [145]. Factor X is the multiplier of process eco-efficiency. In the immediate term, CP is associated with incremental improvements to existing processes. In a second stage of progress, new technologies are implemented that multiply by 4 the efficiency of the current processes. And lastly, sustainable technologies would be achieved reversely, determining first the target to be attained and then how to achieve it (figure 10.5).

The Factor X value required to achieve changes is the subject of debates. It may be uncertain at present, but it unquestionably means a change in magnitude, which can only be attained through a coordinated effort in technology, economy and a policy that promotes social and cultural changes. Far from believing that these changes will occur spontaneously, it is necessary to establish instruments of monitoring, reflection, planning, action and correction of the technology.

Figure 10.5 Temporary Framework for Sustainable Technologies

In a framework of progress such as in figure 10.6, the scientists must identify the signs and evidences of physical and environmental unsustainability through studying the state of the world (with measures, indicators...) at a global and local level. The trends are influenced by the complex biological, geological, physical and chemical cycles of the environment. For each piece of evidence (such as climate change), the environmental strategy needs to establish an inventory of cause-effect relations and assess the degree by which the different causes contribute to the effect studied. This information (indicators of state, trends and causes) must be shared with the social agents.

Figure 10.6 Evolution to the New Sustainable Technologies

To achieve the Factor X change, the current range of management tools and methodologies [146], [147], [148], [149], [150], [151], [152] must evolve and adapt to future requirements; we must be able to surmount new obstacles and introduce the appropriate technological changes in the production system. Future proposals for new technologies should undergo a technological assessment to check their conditions of sustainability.

10.8 Case Study: Technological Policy Instruments

Different outlooks on sustainable development can lead to different types of interventions from governments in the management of the transition process. A review of the different instruments implemented by European countries has allowed to compile the guidelines of potential action [146] for the development of a technological policy based on knowledge. It is up to the governments to adapt the appropriate composition to each country's circumstances, from among the following categories.

10.8.1 Financing of Knowledge Infrastructures

  • Direct Selective Subsidies

    The subsidy assigned by the government directly and selectively is a common instrument that many countries use and that is aimed at:

    • a programme
    • a project
    • an institution

    to create a physical infrastructure of knowledge support when a government is very interested in the goal. The subsidy is generally accompanied by other instruments of knowledge management and transfer. Sometimes, the success of these instruments is limited due to the complexity associated with the administrative procedures, joint-financing requirements or restrictions in exploiting the results with which they are associated.

  • Financial and Economic Instruments for support of venture capital [147]

    The government can apply a variety of venture capital instruments, such as:

    • Direct investments in the capital of small enterprises
    • Low interest loans, long term or non-returnable in case of failure to succeed
    • Tax incentives
    • Guarantee on part of a bank loan
    • Guarantee on part of a capital losses in high risk investments

    The United States have the widest range of venture capital combinations. Some programmes contribute simply to the technological development of SMEs based on economic criteria (jobs created, potential impact). Others seek to promote cooperation between those who develop technology and the suppliers of venture capital. However, none of these programmes focuses exclusively on innovation aimed at sustainable development.

  • Tax Incentives [148], [149]

    Governments generally prefer to apply tax incentives rather than direct economic contributions. The most common forms are:

    • Accelerated payback on R+D costs (not investment costs) that are (generally 100%) deductible from the annual income.
    • Accelerated payback on investment in R+D, that vary greatly from one country to another.
    • The number of years in which payback can be made on R+D costs o tax deductions, aside from other circumstances such as temporary losses.
    • Tax reductions on R+D, according to different criteria.
  • Physical Infrastructures

    When knowledge infrastructures are created, the governments are traditionally responsible to provide some of the basic, generally physical, infrastructures such as roads, affordable communication services, etc; however, they may also include some information technologies such as databases. In some cases, they may also provide the location of activities and SMEs near the universities. In such cases, the role that the governments play is closely linked to the other instruments for knowledge management and transfer.

10.8.2 Instruments Aimed at Stimulating, Driving and Catalyzing the Spreading of Knowledge

  • Knowledge management and transfer

    These instruments are not specifically aimed at developing innovation towards sustainability, but act usually as an indirect stimulus or catalyst. There are instruments which focus on:

    • Creating networks that facilitate interaction between enterprises, sometimes due their geographical proximity, such as the promotion of clusters or the creation of mixed research centres (private and public) that are close to a university and focus on solving industrial problems.
    • Developing and preserving human resources, by attracting personnel with the necessary qualifications, sending personnel on stays abroad and establishing favourable conditions for their permanent stay.
    • Providing support to new enterprises, helping them to start up and offering strategic and logistic support, contacts with potential customers, outsourcing, financial support, research units, patent departments, market surveys, etc.
  • Participatory Instruments

    Governments can also participate actively, although not in a directly economical way, by:

    • taking part in the initial testing of new technologies,
    • demonstration projects aimed at stimulating other private participants,
    • personal governmental participation in projects of technological development,
    • regional/local actions in collaboration with private bodies.
  • Green Procurement

    In many countries, the official institutions have established purchase conditions determining specific standards for products that are or have been manufactured according to environmentally sound technologies, aimed at securing a minimum market to guarantee the presence of these products.

10.8.3 Instruments that Help Companies to Comply with Regulations in Relation to the Development of Knowledge

  • Laws and Regulations

    Due to a lack of legal incentives, many enterprises have failed to feel compelled to adopt new technologies. Following the laws and regulations developed, incentives for innovation have focused more on correcting (end-of-pipe treatments) than preventing problems. Rectification has been slow. In order for it to be effective, an harmonization of current regulatory instruments is required on an international scale. Their heterogeneity which has often contributed to slowing down the rectification process.

  • Voluntary Standards

    Self-regulatory instruments have gained importance in the promotion of technological innovation, when they are implemented along with other economic and financial instruments and with the formulation of environmental standards and the transparency required from the firms implementing them. Following are some of these instruments:

    • Environmental Management System (ISO 14000, EMAS)
    • Green labels (for detergents, for example)
    • Operating standards (such as the power consumption of a computer)

11 PREVENTION PRACTICE IN UNIVERSITIES

11.1 Objectives

In recent years, there has been a growing focus on environmental education with the creation of new degrees in environmental science and engineering, and the introduction of environmentally-based courses in other professional careers (known as curriculum greening). Many academic subjects focus on solving environmental problems through the implementation of end-of.pipe treatments and there is generally little CP content in these disciplines [153] and [154]. However, the university is also the place where the concept and practice of pollution prevention at the source should be taught in order for it to be adopted spontaneously as a future business value. The subject of this chapter is to bring the students as close as possible to real experience in industries. This is done:

11.2 The Ingenuity Factory

11.2.1 Introduction

This exercise was developed by the Minnesota Technical Assistance Program and Waste Reduction Institute for Training and Application Research in the United States and since then it has become part of CP training programmes worldwide, aimed at very different audiences: industrialists, legislators, administrations and generally, anyone interested in the concepts of CP.

The principles of minimization are illustrated by simulating an industrial process. The objective is to initiate the participants in the identification of opportunities leading to the reduction at the source of waste generation and resource consumption. The difficulty with the identification and implementation of minimization measures quite often arises from different circumstances such as the staff's refusal to accept changes, the pressure to which the management is subjected or the difficulty in choosing and justifying changes in the production processes without the necessary information and communication.

Good communication can be as essential as the technical capacity to identify and implement the measures leading to waste minimization. The objective is that once the exercise has been completed, the participants will be able to acknowledge the capacity that everyone has, even in unfamiliar situations, to apply CP principles and identify improvement opportunities and the benefits of formulating the right queries while listening to the appropriate people.

11.2.2 Material Required

Groups of 6-7 persons are organized. Each group will require:

  • A work table
  • A sheet of paper to position the production plant 1 m2 approx.
  • Markers and sticky labels
  • Plasticine extrusion machines (such as Play-Doh, Fabrica Loca, with the suitable accessories such as a knife, etc.)
  • 2 pots of yellow plasticine
  • 2 pots of blue plasticine
  • 2 pots of any other plasticine colour.

Scales will also be necessary and shared by all the groups.

11.2.3 Approach to the Exercise

The Ingenuity Factory Ltd. specializes in the production of parts of different shapes and sizes for the automobile industry, through the extrusion of plastic material. Fourteen months ago, the company lost a major contract from their main customer. Since then, the company is going through a difficult situation that will become untenable unless they obtain a major important contract very soon.

Currently, the company is competing for a large contract from one of the manufacturers of middle range automobiles with the largest market share, the firm TAESSA, that is developing its new model and planning a production line applying just-in-timetechniques.

TAESSA will choose a supplier of extruded plastic parts based on the following criteria:

  • Availability/capacity to start production immediately
  • Capacity to deliver the new products within the expected limits
  • Capacity to respond to urgent orders
  • Implementation of ISO 9000 y 14000, and EMAS standards in some cases, paying special attention to the following points:
    • Product quality
    • Production level outside specifications
    • Compliance with environmental laws
    • Generation of hazardous waste.

New product specifications imply using three types of raw materials: type I, type II and type III, of which only type I is considered inert whereas type II and III are considered toxic and/or hazardous. Type III materials lead to a product of higher added value as the handling and transport of these highly toxic materials require special care. Any mixture of these materials will produce materials that must be considered as toxic and/or hazardous.

11.2.4 Company Personnel

The General Manager: is the person who is ultimately responsible for the company. He is in charge of customer relations. As it is important not to lose potential customers, the customer is always right and customer satisfaction is essential. He is unaware of the production process and confines himself to forwarding the orders on to the production manager

The Financial Manager: analyses the production results in accordance with the cost of raw material and personnel. The rest are indirect costs (although he will find that waste management is responsible for a large part of the cost if it is not controlled particularly). He prepares the annual financial results for approval. The accounts always balance perfectly.

The Production Manager: is in charge of supervising the production process. He informs the workers of the quantity and type of material to be manufactured, gives orders to the warehouse manager for the necessary raw materials to be prepared and he is very strict with the safety measures required in this type of installation and depending on the raw material handled. He centralises the workers' complaints and is in charge of organizing the New Year party.

The Warehouse Manager: is in charge of the raw materials and waste inventories, and informs the production manager periodically. He receives orders from the production Manager to prepare the materials required for the production batches and for the collection of waste generated. He does not understand very well what all the concern with waste is about, as it used to be very easy to put it in drums and stack them out in the yard.

The Operators: load and operate the machines for manufacturing extruded products according to orders received from the production manager. They are responsible for cleaning the equipment. They have no specific training. They are happy with their jobs. They buy the sports paper on Mondays and play the lottery on Thursdays.

The Engineer responsible for quality and environment: his job is to make sure that the finished product meets the customer's specifications. He collects master courses. He already owned master degrees in Metrology and Quality and now he has taken a course on Environmental issues in order to assume the tasks associated with same as the pressure has increased, because the company does not have a specific department for these tasks. Next year, he wants to take a master course on Health and Safety. He believes he must be very strict in the implementation of what he has learnt.

The trainer of the exercise acts as the representative of TAESSA and will forward the orders opportunely to the General Manager.

11.2.5 Game Instructions

  1. The trainer discusses with the participants which position they will each occupy in the company's organization chart
  2. Draw the plot plan of the plant. The sheet of paper will represent the area on which the spaces for the various company activities must be distributed. Lines drawn with the marker will represent a physical separation between the spaces. Rational planning and distribution is very important to ensure a correct operation of the industrial activity. The plant must include space for material inflow and outflow, the extrusion machine, warehouses for raw materials, products and waste, control laboratory, offices and any other space the company may require.
  3. Production begins when the orders are received, and it should be remembered that everyone has a specific task.
  4. Once the material is introduced in the extrusion machine, it is processed into products or waste. Direct reuse or recycling of material is not considered.
  5. As the production advances, finished products and waste will be generated. The finished products must pass a quality control to determine if they meet the specifications required. Products that do not meet the quality control requirements determined by the company or the buyer, will be considered as waste.
  6. Waste must be classified according to the process stage in which they were generated and will need to be quantified.
  7. The production manager will convey the information to the financial manager, who will calculate the financial balance of the production with data from the following table.
  8. Once the production is completed, each work group will get together to discuss the evolution of the company, modifications that were made on the spot or that should be taken into account for future production batches. Following are some suggestions for discussion regarding improvement options:
    • To analyze if there is a difference between the amount of waste generated, according to part colour or material deficiency (it is very useful if one of the plasticines is older than the others and imperfect)
    • To determine what operations or causes generated the waste. A 4M (methods, materials, machinery, manpower) cause-effect diagram can be applied here (see chapter 6)
    • To propose measures that should be adopted to improve the company's results, financially as well as environmentally.
FINANCIAL BALANCE OF THE COMPANY
Material Price of raw material (€/g) Waste management cost (€/g) Personnel and other production costs (€) Purchase price fixed by TAESSA (€/g)
L=2 cm L=3 cm
Type I 200 40 30 40 400
Type II 1500 200 50 60 2500
Type III 4000 500 150 200 6000
Price of raw materials, products and waste
Products Expenses (€/unit) Cost price (€/unit)
Raw materials Waste management Production
Rectangle
H
Star
Cylinder
TOTAL

11.3 The Kitchen Factory

11.3.1 Presentation

However easy CP implementation may seem to an expert, a theoretical class on the subject will never be conveyed as effectively to the students as in any other more conventional university courses. This will be an important teaching challenge, because many of the concepts are based on tools and experiences that are difficult to recreate in a typical class. Furthermore, to achieve a complete identification of all the opportunities will require specific knowledge of the industrial processes to which the CP assessment will be applied.

It is difficult to find real projects to practise on in order to achieve a sufficient degree of experience in this field. More so when you consider the large number of students that there can be in such a course and the difficulty in gaining access to companies that will open up their facilities for this type of assessment. In order to overcome these difficulties, the University of Girona has developed the present exercise based on the daily activities of a home kitchen called the Kitchen Factory [155]. Clear similarities can be found between a kitchen and the industrial processes, and this relationship provides a useful educational tool for university courses.

11.3.2 Exercise Approach

In this exercise, the students assess the CP opportunities in a home kitchen (shared by the group or belonging to one of the group members). A tutor is in charge of giving the initial guidelines on how to proceed and of answering the students' queries during the exercise. The students receive guidance but have to decide how to organize themselves. The work teams are divided into groups of 4-5 students. The groups must plan the tasks and organize the assessment. After completing the practical exercise, they will write a paper and prepare an oral presentation. The results of the different groups are then compared and the differences of opinion discussed.

The work can be divided into two parts:

  • Part 1. Diagnosis

    This first part includes the following tasks:

    • Description of the installations, equipment and activities carried out.
    • Identification of the basic operations and preparation of the flow chart of the activities carried out in the kitchen.
    • Compilation of information available on the input of raw materials, water and energy.
    • Identification and quantification of process outputs: products/by-products and waste streams.
    • Allocation of these flow rates to the various unit operations.
    • Balances of material and energy.

    In absence of background information, the students will decide the procedures and time devoted to compiling data. Following are a few guidelines that can be provided for the students:

    • Identify raw materials and waste streams.
    • Material inputs are determined by recording all the purchases carried out.
    • Solid waste output is quantified by individual segregation and weighing.
    • The consumption of water and ancillary services, such as electricity or natural gas, are calculated from the corresponding meter readings.
    • As these meters measure the consumption of the whole house, the student must find alternative ways to determine or evaluate the consumption corresponding to the kitchen activities; for example, by quantifying the energy consumption of electrical appliances with the nominal power and from the number of total operating hours.
    • Analytical measures that would need to be carried out on a few particular streams (such as the wastewater COD).
    • Units for expressing the results (some groups use consumptions per capita, whereas others calculate total consumptions without the number of users).

    The students can take into account the need to define the scope of the study within the physical limits encountered in an actual operation and the more or less partial information gathered (for example: do consumptions vary with the seasons?, is information available for every season?, should the scope of the study exclude the process of eating, or should it be included?, how to process recycling of dishes, leftover food and remains?, etc.). They must also face some difficulties with the assignation of resources between the activities, some of which are excluded from the study (such as how to distribute the water or electricity consumption between the different activities in the house?).

  • Part 2. Assessing and Comparing the Results, Generating Options and Priorities

    Once a quantitative assessment has been made of the streams and consumptions, the data obtained by all the groups of participants are tabulated; then they are compared, and their dispersion is discussed as well as the reasons for these variations. Comparing the data obtained by the different groups and matching it to the data existing in literature allows the introduction of the students to the concepts of benchmarking and best available technique.

    The data must be assessed in order to identify which operations and forms of management have a greater impact on the consumption of resources and/or the generation of waste. In fact, as with industries, it is frequently found that by following Pareto's principle, very few activities or sub-activities account for the largest contribution to the waste streams of a specific facility.

    In waste management, it is important to choose the best units (of volume and weight) to express the results. If the data are analyzed according to the volume, it appears that the main contribution to waste generation comes from packaging, whereas judging by weight organic material is the main component of the solid waste generated in a kitchen. It is interesting to research the origin of this organic material. It often stems from the conditioning stages of the raw material, but often also because there is a significant contribution of material that is not consumed

    The last job to be carried out consists in generating options for resource saving and waste stream minimization, considering the various potential levels of action:

    • The transformation process itself
    • The installation, including equipment
    • The organization and management of the facility (SGA), including purchasing and warehouse management and maintenance and cleaning operations.

    For options that are linked to an investment, the saving associated with the improvements proposed is calculated and the payback period determined.

    The work concludes with a justification of the recommendations for implementing the most appropriate options.

11.4 CP in University Laboratories

11.4.1 Objectives

Nowadays, most university laboratories are planning to implement some type of CP or waste stream minimization. The exercise may be carried out by a professional in charge who has been expressly assigned to the job, or advantage taken of the possibility of using team in training, that has the technical and communication capacities required. .

Several manuals and books have been published on Best Environmental Practices (BEPs) in Laboratories that focus on the integration of environmental aspects in the daily tasks of a laboratory [156], [157], [158]. These and other publications are equally useful to begin a practical CP diagnosis in university laboratories.

Following are some of the goals that can be established by the centres, in order to underline the convenience of a diagnosis and count on general support:

  • Replacing toxic or hazardous substances with non or less toxic or hazardous substances.
  • Purchasing smaller amounts to reduce surplus.
  • Stock management and distribution of surplus among the different centres.
  • Changing equipment and procedures aimed at improving efficiency.
  • Reducing the scale of experiments.
  • Reuse and recycling.

As a CP target, there is a tendency to think of chemical laboratories and the chemical substances handled, although the same principles can be applied to biological and medical laboratories with a specialized reasoning. Clinical wastes are of particular interest in the waste management of today's society. It should also be considered if the institution generating the waste is using radioactive materials, and if so, a specific programme should be provided [158].

11.4.2 Barriers and Benefits

As with any project that involves an activity change, the assessment coordinator can run into difficulties in the implementation of CP measures. Many of these difficulties are the same as those found in industries, however, the following should particularly be considered when planning the assessments:

  • The negative impact that an interruption of the normal laboratory activity could have on research and teaching.
  • The research personnel's reluctance (also) to any change.
  • The real inconveniences represented by a change in the operating procedures or the purchase strategy.
  • More problems may arise if it is sensed that the assessment could lead to changes in the personnel's authority or responsibilities.

Despite these difficulties, the benefits that will be added by the conclusions of the assessment must be underlined. In addition to the environmental improvement and cost reduction:

  • the results of the assessment provide the students with a healthy work environment and better professional training with regard to environmental requirements
  • an improved public image of the institution (and a leading role in the initiative that can be conferred to a centre if the implementation is carried out).

11.4.3 Assessment Stages

To assess the possibilities of CP in the laboratories, it is advisable for the team conducting the assessment to talk with the heads of the laboratories and find out what operating criteria are used:

  • Is there a Good Practices manual available?
  • Is there is a written policy for waste stream management?
  • What are the criteria used to decide on the discharge of waste substances to the sewer system?
  • What waste can be dumped in the inert containers?
  • Are there any neutralization reactions or other preliminary treatments applied to integrate treatment and prevention?
  • How does the purchase department operate and what purchase strategy do they follow?
  • Is there a stock inventory and what is the cost of the substances listed on the inventory, etc.?

The activities that the assessment team must develop to achieve a correct assessment of the laboratories, include:

  • Preparing a site-specific assessment procedure (derived from the CP assessment methodology described in chapter 5).
  • Defining the roles of the coordinator and the assessment team, and the participation of the laboratory manager.
  • Determining the annual consumptions of all the materials.
  • Determining the amounts and destinations of all waste streams.
  • Specifying the main toxic and hazardous substances used in the laboratory, in what amounts, where they are discharged and if they should be prioritized due to their toxicity or hazard and due to the volume handled.
  • Searching for possible substitutes for these substances and discussing with the teachers and instructors any possible disadvantages in contrast with the expected reduction of impacts.
  • Identifying specific improvement options in each laboratory.

In order to implement the options, it is advisable to:

  • Motivate the heads of the laboratories, explaining the environmental, social and economic interest that these proposals may include.
  • Prepare a pilot programme that allows to show the real advantages and introduce modifications in the general programme, when necessary.
  • Due to the different equipment and materials used, it is necessary to know where qualified technical support can be found, when appropriate.

11.4.4 Microscale Experimentation

The use of microscale experimentation [159] is a change of scale in the implementation of CP in laboratories, which will require a completely different approach to the activity. The idea goes beyond an assessment and the pros and cons should be discussed at an institutional scale.

The idea of conducting a microscale chemical experiment is not a new one. Pregl was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1923 for his microscale works. Some attempts to adopt microscale programmes were not very successful. The reasons are always the same (little concern for the environment or the quality of air in the laboratories and no cost for discharge because it all was sent down the drain), as well as a small number of students at the time and a lack of precision in the measuring instruments. In the eighties, there was an increase in the concern for human and environmental risk, and electronic scales became popular. It is then that the interest for microscale increased, particularly in organic chemistry laboratories.

Microscale implies an important reduction in the amount of reagents and solvents (up to 100 times less approx.). Experimental techniques differ considerably with regard to equivalent techniques at a conventional scale. The glass instruments and reaction or transfer conditions are also very different.

The positive effects are important. There is a reduction in the amount and cost of waste stream discharges, although one of the main advantages is an improvement of the health and safety aspects. The amounts of solvents and VOCs released to the environment atmosphere are also reduced by 100 times approx. The risk of explosions or fires also decreases. The lower cost has a pedagogic advantage as it allows an increase in the number of experiments using the same resources. Another positive factor is that many experiments take half the time.

The advantages are later exported to the industry once the future professionals have been trained with microscale experimentation.

The conversion cost is estimated at 200-300 € per student, with a 1-3 year payback period, according to the number of students.

11.5 Case Study: Diagnosis of the Faculty

11.5.1 Sustainability in Universities

University faculties, either separately or as part of the diagnosis of the entire university, are another excellent site for students to practise CP. Particularly the Faculties of Science or the Polytechnic Faculties of Universities, that are a complex experimentation framework of experiments with their research and teaching laboratories. Laboratories consume many different substances and produce waste streams. They also consume water and various types of energy. They have in common with the other non-experimental faculties that an important part of the energy is used for lighting, heating and air-conditioning.

Performing diagnoses of university centres (faculties, schools, etc.) is another potential subject for University environmental projects that offers students practical training. Exchanging comparative data between Universities would act as a stimulus to determine general management criteria and help with the selection of sustainable facilities in universities.

11.5.2 Diagnosis Applied to the University of Girona Faculty of Science

One of the degree theses in Environmental Science at Girona University was the diagnosis of the Faculty of Science [160]. Following the diagnosis, the students proposed different CP measures and a proposal for indicators. No previous similar studies were found and therefore the data obtained are shown here as a reference for other diagnoses and similar works.

In the case of the Faculty of Science the data was obtained from two different situations in the Faculty, before and after extending the buildings. Before the extension, the heating consisted of a natural gas boiler. Then a heat pump was added to heat the extension (one third of the building approx.), and air-conditioning for the entire Faculty in the summertime.

Many of these figures were compared with other non-experimental faculties in the same University of Girona. It is obvious that the consumptions must refer to specific data for comparisons to be made between faculties of different sizes. The most obvious dimension is the number of students or better still, the total number of people occupying the faculty. As some centres or universities are more fortunate than others when it comes to the space available, a second dimensional reference is the surface occupied. In some aspects, a yearly figure may not be very representative, particularly due to the influence of the climate on heating or air-conditioning consumptions. Data collection over time should allow to check the evolution of data, have a range of values to cover the various weather conditions and verify the results of the implementation of CP options.

Following are the most interesting results of the estimated data obtained during the diagnosis:

  • Water Consumption
    Faculty Science Polytechnic Law Economics
    m3/person and year 4,6-6,4 3,3-5,1 1,2-1,5 1,7-2,9

    Distribution percentage of the water applications in the Faculty of Science:

    Laboratories 54,5 %
    Health 37,6 %
    Cleaning0,2 %
    Watering7,5 %
  • Electricity
    Faculty

    Science

    Nat.gas heating

    Science

    Ditto+heat pump

    Polytechnic Law Economics
    Natural gas heating
    kWh/person and year 430-480 660-690 300-310 350-370 200-250
    kWh/m2 and year 85-91 124-131 64-71 40-47 48-57

    In addition, the hours spent in the research laboratories should be taken into account, which are higher in the Faculty of Science.

    Distribution percentage of the electricity applications in the Faculty of Science:

    Lighting21 %
    Computers26 %
    Laboratory equipment17 %
    Heat pumpr16 %
    Other 20 %
  • Gas
    Faculty

    Science

    Nat.gas heating

    Science

    Ditto+heat pump

    Polytechnic Law Economics
    Natural gas heating
    m3/person and year 4,5-6,3 4,0-4,7 3,3-3,7 6,3-6,6 3,1-3,4

    In the Faculty of Science, only 0.5% of gas is consumed in the laboratories. The rest is consumed for heating.

  • Transport

    Following a poll conducted on the means of locomotion used (car, bus, walking, bicycle), a valuation was made of the energy consumptions for personnel transport, in order to compare the energy consumptions for transport with the previous consumptions. The comparison is as follows:

    Consumption Electricity Gas Transport Total
    kWh/person 680 265 2.600 3.545

    The impact of transport on the overall energy consumption is significant (around 73%). This percentage gives an idea of the interest in including the rationalization of personnel transport in universities' environmentalization programmes.

  • Paper Used
    Source Own paper Copies Administration Total
    Kg/student and year 3,7 1,5 2,1 7,3
  • Selective Waste Collection
    Type Paper Glass Containers Other Special
    Kg/student and year 3,9 0,35 0,16 0,60 0,42

Some examples of improvement opportunities can be pointed out in the Girona Science Faculty: the water taps in the lavatories and the paper consumption. The water taps are equipped with an automatic device that regulates the flow and operation. The consumptions per press action were 0.65-4.26 litres, averaging 2.8 litres on 30 taps. The need to review the system was obvious. Concerning the paper, a minimization campaign was proposed that included the promotion of websites for each study and the consolidation of selective collection, two-sided copies, reuse, etc.

At the same time, a system of sustainability indicators was suggested that would include water and energy consumptions, waste for recycling and generation of toxic waste, emissions to air from combustions and transport, and special attention to the use of the different transport systems.

12 References

  1. Mebratu D. (1998). Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Historical and Conceptual Review. Environ. Impact Asses. Rev. 18, p. 493-520.
  2. Wilcox B. A. (1992). Defining Sustainable Development. Environ. Sci. Technol, vol. 26, nº 10, p. 1902.
  3. WCED (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press. Londres.
  4. NU. Division for Sustainable Development. Agenda 21. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/agenda21text.htm
  5. PNUMA (UNEP) (2001). Cleaner Production - Key Elements. http://www.unepie.org/pc/cp/home.htm
  6. RAC/CP - MAP (2004). Study on the State of Cleaner Production in the Mediterranean Action Plan Countries. 2on edition.
  7. USEPA (1988). Waste Minimization Opportunity Assessment Handbook. EPA 625/7-88-003.
  8. Ontario Waste Management Corporation (1987) Industrial Waste Audit and Reduction Manual.
  9. UNEP. Waste Minimization. Industry and Environment, vol. 12, nº 1 (1989).
  10. Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Medi Ambient (1991). Reducció de Residus. Guia per a l'avaluació d'oportunitats als processos industrials.
  11. CEMA (1999). DAOM. Diagnosis Ambiental de Oportunidades de Minimización.
  12. RAC/CP - MAP (2001). Study on the State of Cleaner Production in the Mediterranean Action Plan Countries.
  13. European Environment Agency. Cleaner Production. http://service.eea.eu.int/envirowindows
  14. Hulpke H. y U. Müller-Eisen (1997). The Prevention Principle. Environmental Protection Integrated in Production Processes. Environ. Sci. & Pollut. Res. 4(3), pp. 146-153.
  15. WBCSD. C. Holliday y J. Pepper (2001). Sustainability through the market.
  16. WBCSD (2000). Eco-efficiency. Creating more value with less impact.
  17. OECD Reference Manual (2000). Strategic Waste Prevention. NV/EPOC/PPC(2000)5/Final.
  18. Herkert J. R., A. Farrell y J. J. Winebrake (1996.) Technology Choice for Sustainable Development. IEEE Technology and Society 15(4), pp. 11-20.
  19. European Environmental Agency (1998). Environmental Management Tools for SMEs: A Handbook.
  20. RAC/CP - MAP (2004). Study on the State of Cleaner Production in the Mediterranean Action Plan Countries. 2on edition. Woodward J. (1958). Management and Technology. HMSO. También en Pugh D. S. Organization Theory. Selected Readings.
  21. Pugh D. S. Ed. (1984). Organization Theory. Selected Readings. Penguin Business Books. 2nd ed. Londres.
  22. Ernst & Young (1992). Guide to Total Cost Management. John Wiley, New York.
  23. Olsthoorn X., D. Tyteca, W. Wehrmeyer y M. Wagner (2001). Environmental indicators for business: a review of the literature and standardisation methods. Journal of Cleaner Production 9, pp. 453-463.
  24. Veleva V. y M. Ellenbecker (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 9, pp. 519-549.
  25. ISO 14031(1999). Environmental Performance Evaluation: Guidelines.
  26. OECD (1993). Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance reviews. Environment Monographs, nº 83. París.
  27. ISO 14001 (1996). Environmental Management Systems: Specification with guidance for use.
  28. Haas E. A. (1987). Breakthrough Manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp. 75-81.
  29. Berglund R. L. y C. T. Lawson (1991). Preventing Pollution in the CPI. Chemical Engineering. September, pp. 120-127.
  30. European Environment Agency (1998). Environmental Management Tools for SMEs: A Handbook. Ed. R. Starkey. Copenhagen. http://www.eea.eu.int
  31. UNEP/ICC/FIDIC (1995). Environmental Management System. Training Resource Kit.
  32. ISO 14001 (1996). Environmental Management Systems: Specification with guidance for use.
  33. National Pollution Prevention Roundtable. ISO 14000 Workgroup (1998) White Paper.
  34. European Union (2001). Regulation (EC) No. 761/2001 of the European Parliament and Council of 19 March 2001 allowing voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS). DO L 114/1.
  35. THe BREF are available on the following website www.jrc.es
  36. ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) (1988). Environmental Auditing. París.
  37. Ayres R. U. y U. E. Simonis eds. (1994). Industrial Metabolism. Restructuring for Sustainable Development. UN University Press. Tokio.
  38. Allenby B. R. (1999). Industrial Ecology: policy framework and implementation. Prentice-Hall. Englewod Cliffs.
  39. Ehrenfeld J. y N. Gertler (1997). Industrial Ecology in Practice: the Evolution of Interdependece at Kalundborg. Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 67-79.
  40. Van Berkel R., E. Willems y M. Lafleur (1997). The Relationship between Cleaner Production and Industrial Ecology. Journal of Ind. Ecology vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 37-49.
  41. Rieradevall J. y J. Vinyets (1999). Ecodiseño y ecoproductos. Ed. Rubes. Barcelona.
  42. Van Hemel C. y J. Cramer (2002). Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production 10, pp. 439-453.
  43. Brenneman D. R. y D. R. Hattaway (1995). Incorporate pollution prevention into your business plan. Hydrocarbon processing, August, pp. 84-86.
  44. UNEP (1997). ECODESIGN. A Promising approach to sustainable production and consumption.
  45. Fullana P. y R. Puig (1998). Análisis del Ciclo de Vida. Ed. Rubes. Barcelona.
  46. Von Weizsäcker E. U., L. H. Lovins y A. B. Lovins (1997). Factor 4. Círculo de Lectores. Barcelona.
  47. Lefebvre E., L. A. Lefebvre y S. Talbot (2001). Life Cycle Design Approach in SMEs. Int. J LCA 6 (5), p. 273-280.
  48. USEPA (1995). An Introduction to Environmental Accounting as a Business Management Tool: Key Concepts and Terms. USEPA 742/R/95-001.
  49. Hammer B. (1998). Management Accounting: The Hidden Driver for Clean Production. http://www.cleanerproduction.com/hits/ems.htm
  50. Kennedy M. (1998). Critical Issues of Total Cost Assessment: Gathering Environmental Cost Data for P2. Pollution Prevention Review. Spring, pp. 87-96.
  51. USEPA (1993). A Primer for Financial Analysis of Pollution Prevention Projects. USEPA (1995). EPA/600/R-93/059.
  52. OECD. Tools for Evaluating Pollution Prevention Opportunities.
  53. Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Medi Ambient (1999). DAOM. Diagnosis Ambiental de Oportunidades de Minimización.
  54. Ekvall T. y G. Finnveden (2001). Allocation in ISO 14041 – A Critical Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 9, pp. 197-208.
  55. ISO 14041 (1998). Life Cycle Assessment. Ginebra.
  56. Bartlett K. L., R. R. Lester y R. B. Pojasek (1995). Prioritizing P2 Opportunities with Activity-Based Costing. Pollution Prevention Review. Autumn, pp. 17-26.
  57. Higgins T. E. (1995). Pollution Prevention Handbook. CRC Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, Florida.
  58. Rigola M. (1998). Producción + Neta. Ed. Rubes y Generalitat de Catalunya. Barcelona.
  59. UNIDO/UNEP (1995). Guidance Materials for the UNIDO/UNEP National Cleaner Production Centres. París.
  60. USEPA (1988). Waste Minimization Opportunity Assessment Manual. EPA/625/7-88/003.
  61. Hanlon D. y C. Fromm (1990). Waste Minimization Assessments. Cap. 5 en Freeman H. M. Hazardous Waste Minimization. McGraw-Hill. New York.
  62. Freeman. H. M. ed. (1995). Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook. McGraw-Hill. New York.
  63. University of Massachusetts Lowell (1994). Curriculum for Toxics Use Reduction Planners. 6th ed. Spring.
  64. Asante-Duah D. K. (1993). Hazardous Waste Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, Florida.
  65. Allen D. T. y D. R. Shonnard (2002). Green Engineering. Environmentally Conscious Design of Chemical Processes. Prentice Hall PTR. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  66. ACGIH, http://www.acgih.org
  67. IRIS http://www.epa.gov/iris/
  68. Departament de Medi Ambient (2000). Disseny i aplicació d'un programa de Bones Pràctiques Ambientals a la indústria. Generalitat de Catalunya.
  69. Freeman H. M. (1990). Hazardous Waste Minimization. McGraw Hill, Nueva York.
  70. Freeman H. M. Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook. McGraw-Hill. New York. 1995.
  71. USEPA (1986). Waste Minimization. Issues and Options. Washington.
  72. Winter G. (1988). Bussiness and the Environment. Hamburgo.
  73. Berglund R. (1994). Linking Pollution Prevention and Plant Maintenance: a Critical Need for Continuous Improvement. Waste Management, vol. 14, nº 3-4, pp. 253-265.
  74. Idhammar C. (1997). Strive Maintenance without Waste. Chemical Engineering. November, pp. 163-171.
  75. McComas C. (1995). Controlling Purchasing and Inventory to Reduce Waste. Pollution prevention review, Spring, pp. 27-35.
  76. Rigola M. (1998). Producción + Neta. Ed. Rubes y Generalitat de Catalunya. Barcelona.
  77. Martínez P. J. y E. Rus (1994). La Gestión del Almacenamiento de Productos Químicos. Ingeniería Química. Septiembre, pp 103-107.
  78. Gessner A. W. (1998). Switch Materials to Prevent Pollution. Chem. Eng. Progress, December, pp. 59-64.
  79. University of Massachusetts Lowell (1994). Curriculum for Toxics Use Reduction Planners. 6th ed. Spring.
  80. Gray G. M. y Hartwell J. K. (1995). The Chemical Substitution Tree. Pollution Prevention Review. Spring, pp. 7-17.
  81. Shrewsbury C. y N. Storer. (1996). Solvent Management - Avoid/Reduce Capital Investment in VOC Abatment. En: Sharratt. Case Studies in Environmental Technology, Institution of Chemical Engineers. Rugby.
  82. Wolf K. (1994). The Truths and Myths about Water-Based Cleaning - A Systems Approach to Choosing the Best Alternatives. Pollution Prevention Review. Spring, pp. 141-153.
  83. Zavattoni M. (1996). Tendencias en la Limpieza Industrial. Aspectos Técnicos y Medioambientales. Ingeniería Química. Enero 1996, pp. 103- 109.
  84. Hairston D. W. (1997). Solvent Alternatives. Chemical Engineering. February 1997, pp. 55-58.
  85. [Anonymous] (1991). The Recycling Loop closes for Solvents. Chemical Engineering. June 1991, pp. 43-49.
  86. Joshi S. B. [et al.] (1989). Methods for Monitoring Solvent Condition and Maximizing Its Utilization. En: Conway R. A. Hazardous and Industrial Solid waste Minimization Practices. ASTM. Filadelfia.
  87. Seibert S. (1998). Technisches Management. Innovations Management. Projekt Management. Qualitäts Management. B. G. Teubner Stuttgart. Leipzig.
  88. Nadkarni R. A. (1991). The Quest for Quality in the Laboratory. Analytical Chemistry, vol. 63, nº 13, July 1, pp. 675a-682a.
  89. Contino A. V. (1987). Improve Plant Performance via Statistical Process Control. Chemical Engineering, July 20, pp. 95-102.
  90. Woodruff D. M. y F. M. Phillips (1986). The Pareto chart. Tool for Problem Solving. Chemical Engineering, April 14, pp. 111-114.
  91. Rigola M. [et al.]. (1993). Waste Minimization in Fine Chemicals Manufacture. A M. Pellicer ed. Chemical Industry and Environment. Vol. III. European Meeting on Chemical Industry and Environment. UPC/UdG/SCT. Girona.
  92. Moore F. L. (1995). "Pollution Prevention in the Chemical Industry", in: Freeman H. M., Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Nueva York.
  93. Pereira C. J. (1999). Environmentally friendly processes. Chem. Eng. Science 54, pp. 1959-1973.
  94. Hugl H. y C. Gürtler (2001). Chemical industry reduces emissions – from production to the consumer. Chemosphere 43, pp. 17-20.
  95. Zlokarnik M. (1996). "Produktionsintegrierter Umweltschutz in der Chemischen Industrie", en: Brauer H., Produktions- und Produkt-Integrierter Umweltschutz, Springer, Berlin.
  96. Sheldon R. A. (1992). Organic Synthesis – Past, Present and Future. Chemistry & Industry 7. December, pp. 903-906.
  97. Anastas P. T. y C. A. Farris eds. (1994). Benign by Design Alternative: Synthetic Design for Pollution Prevention. ACS Symposium Series 577, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. Anastas P. T. (1998). Green Chemistry. Oxford UP.
  98. Pistikopoulos E. N. ed. (1999). Special Issue: Design and operation of sustainable and environmentally benign processes. Preface. Computers and Chem. Eng. 23, p. 1363.
  99. Bayer e. y D. Lenoir (2001). Sustainable chemistry: Environmentally friendly and resource saving syntheses and processes. Chemosphere 43, p. 1.
  100. DeVito S. C. y R. L. Garrett eds. (1996). Designing Safer Chemicals: Green Chemistry for Pollution Prevention. ACS Symposium Series 640, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
  101. USEPA (http://www.epa.gov/greenchemistry/tools.htm)
  102. Douglas J. M. (1988). Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes, McGraw Hill, New York.
  103. Smith R. y E. Petela (1991-1992). Waste Minimization in the Process Industries. The Chemical Engineer.
  104. Levenspiel O. (1999). Chemical Reactor Engineering. 3ª ed. John Wiley. New York.
  105. Denbigh K. G. (1958). Chem. Eng. Sci. 8, p.125. Chemical Reactor Theory.
  106. Fogler S. H. (1998). Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering. Prentice Hall, New York.
  107. Allen D. T. y K. S. Rosselot (1997). Pollution Prevention for Chemical Processes, John Wiley, New York.
  108. Hooper J. R. (1995). Pollution Prevention trough Reactor Design, in: Freeman H. M., Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Nueva York.
  109. Bell A. T. y L. E. Manzer (1995). Protecting the Environment through Catalysis. Chem. Eng. Progress, February, pp. 26-34.
  110. Haggin J. (1994). Catalysis critical to benign process design. C&EN, April 18, pp. 22-25.
  111. Houghton C., B. Sowerby y B. Crittenden (1996). Clean Design of Batch Processes, en Sharratt P. (ed.), Case Studies in Environmental Technology, Institution of Chem. Engs., Rugby.
  112. Dyer J. A., K. L. Mullholland y R. A. Keller (1999). Prevent Pollution in Batch Processes. Chem. Eng. Progress, May, pp. 24-29.
  113. World Resources Institute. http://earthtrends.wri.org
  114. EEC (1993, 1995). Water Series. (1) Protection of water resources and aquatic ecosystem. (2) Protection and sustainable use of waters, recommendations to EEC Governements and the EEC Action Plan to implement Agenda 21. United Nations Economic Comission for Europe, UN, Nueva York.
  115. Rosain R. M. (1993). Reusing Water in CPI Plants. Chem. Eng. Progress, April, pp.28-35.
  116. Byers W. [et al.] (1995). How to Implement Industrial Water Reuse. A Systematic Approach. CWRT. AIChE. New York.
  117. Holiday A. D. Conserving and reusing wastewater. Chem. Eng., April 19, pp. 118-137.
  118. Zinkus G. A., W. D. Byers y W. W. Doerr (1998). Identify Appropiate Water Reclamation Technologies. Chem. Eng. Progress, May, pp. 19-31.
  119. CAR/PL (2002). Prevenció en Origen de la Contaminació en el Sector de Tractament de Superfícies en el Mediterrani.
  120. P2IRIS (2001). Metal finishing. http://www.epa.gov
  121. University of Massachusetts Lowell (1994). Curriculum for Toxics Use Reduction Planners. 6th ed. Spring.
  122. Stenum (1994). Preventive Environmental Protection Approaches in Europe. Prepare-Osterreich. Graz. Ecoprofit, vol. 6.
  123. Waterland A. F. (1982). Energy Auditing: A Systematic Search for Energy- Saving Opportunities. En: W. C. Turner Ed. de Energy Management Handbook. John Wiley. New York.
  124. Kennedy W. J., W. C. Turner y B. L. Capehart (1994). Guide to Energy Management. TFP-Prentice Hall.
  125. Kenney W. F. (1984). Energy Conservation in the Process Industries. Academic Press, Orlando.
  126. Martín J. L. (1998). Termodinàmica tècnica per a enginyers. Problemes resolts. Ed. UPC. Barcelona.
  127. Linnhoff B. (1994). Use Pinch Analysis to Knock Down Capital Costs and Emissions. Chem. Eng. Progress, pp. 32-57.
  128. Smith R. (1995). Chemical Process Design. McGraw-Hill. New York.
  129. Clevenger L. y J. Hassell (1994). Case Study: From Jump Start to High Gear-How Dupont is Cutting Costs by Boosting Energy Efficiency. Pollution Prevention Review. Summer, pp. 301-312.
  130. UNEP (1996). Environmental Management in the Brewing Industry. Technical Report nº 33.
  131. Departament de Medi Ambient. Producció + neta. Fitxa 29. Reducció de la contaminació en el procés de producció de cervesa.
  132. European Commission (1997). Clean technologies for waste minimisation. Section 3: Manufacture of beverages: brewing industry.
  133. EP3. USAID (1997). Pollution Prevention Diagnostic Assessment. Brewery.
  134. Institut Català d'Energia (1993). Tecnologies Avançades en Estalvi i Eficiència Energètica. Sector de Begudes Alcohòliques: vi, cava, cervesa i destil·lats.
  135. Environment Australia (2002). Cleaner Production. Cogeneration Helps Reduce Malting. http://www.deh.gov.au/settlements/industry/corporate/eecp/case-studies/admalt.html
  136. Molina F. y F. Mascle (1986). El secado de la malta con bomba de calor. Alimentación. Mayo-junio, pp. 135-139.
  137. González-Velasco J. R., J. I. Gutiérrez y J. A. González (1984). Aprovechamiento de la energía en las plantas de proceso. Bombas de calor. Aplicación a una cervecería. Ingeniería Química. Marzo, pp. 111-115. Mayo, pp. 159-163.
  138. Monasterio R., P. Hernández y J. Saiz (1993). Compresión Mecànica de Vapor. McGraw-Hill. Madrid.
  139. Butcher C. (1993). Probing the Pinch. The Chemical Engineer, 15, July, pp. 25-26.
  140. Shapiro K., E. Harriman y A. Dierks (1995). Measuring Toxics Use reduction. Pollution Prevention Review, Summer, pp. 47-55.
  141. Beder S. (1994). The Role of Technology in Sustainable Development. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Winter, pp. 14-19.
  142. Moser F. (1996). Kreislaufwirtschaft und nachhaltige Enwicklung. En: H. Brauer ed. Produktions- und produkt- integrierter Umweltschutz. Springer. Berlin.
  143. UNEP. IE (1994). Governement Strategies and Policies for Cleaner Production.
  144. Keijzers G. (2002) The transition to the sustainable enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production 10, pp. 349-359.
  145. Reijnders L. (1998). The Factor X Debate: Setting Targets for Eco- Efficiency. Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 2, nº 1, pp. 13-22.
  146. Robert K. H. [et al.] (2002). Strategic Sustainable Development – selection, design and synergies of applied tools. Journal of Cleaner production 10, pp. 197-214.
  147. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (2001). Stimulating Industrial Innovation for Sustainability: an International Analysis. Netherlands.
  148. OECD (1997). Government Venture Capital for Technology-Based Firms. OECD/GD(97)201.
  149. OECD (1999). Globalization of Industrial R&D: Policy Issues.
  150. OECD (1996). Fiscal Measures to Promote R&D and Innovation. OECD/GD(96)165.
  151. Vollenbroek F. A. (2002). Sustainable development and the challenge of innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production 10, pp. 215-223.
  152. European Environment Agency (1999). Making sustainability accountable: Eco-efficiency, resource productivity and innovation. Topic report nº 11/1999. EEA, Copenhague.
  153. Cortese A. D. (1993). Building the intellectual capacity for a sustainable future. In: UNEP/IE, vol 16, nº 4, Education and Training.
  154. Allen D., N. Bakshani y S. Rosselot (1992). Pollution Prevention: Homework and Design Problems for Engineering Curricula. UCLA.
  155. Martín M. J. y Rigola M. (2002). The kitchen factory: a training tool for Cleaner Production. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, vol. 18, nº 2, pp. 149-159.
  156. Departament de Medi Ambient (2002). Bones Pràctiques Ambientals als laboratoris. Generalitat de Catalunya.
  157. Battelle (1996). Laboratory Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention. A Guide for Teachers. http://www.seattle.battelle.org/services/e&s/P2LabMan/index2.htm
  158. Reinhardt P. A., K. L. Leonard y P. C. Ashbrook (1996). Pollution Prevention and Waste Minimization in Laboratories. CRC Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, Florida.
  159. Pike R. M., Z. Szafran y M. M. Singh (1996). The Microscale Chemistry laboratory. En: Reinhardt [et al.].
  160. Carreras/Galceran/Renau/Rovira (2002). Diagnosi de la facultat de Ciències. Universitat de Girona.